Recs

6

No Bank Is "Too Big to Fail!"

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

That’s the argument Nouriel "Dr. Doom" Roubini -- one of the few analysts who foresaw the credit crisis -- makes in an opinion piece he co-authored for the Financial Times this week. Pretty bold stuff, but given the stakes, isn’t it at least worth considering?

Extra capital required = failed institution?
Roubini is mistaken that the market will consider that the banks that require additional capital are failed institutions -- barring them from being able to raise private capital and pushing them into the government’s arms. Both Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) have announced multi-billion dollar common share offerings on the heels of the results -- I expect both of these to be successful.

(The ability of regional banks such as Regions Financial (NYSE: RF  ) , KeyCorp (NYSE: KEY  ) , and SunTrust Banks (NYSE: STI  ) is admittedly less clear-cut.)

How to manage a large bank failure
Even if a large bank failure doesn’t play out during this crisis, Roubini's notion that large bank failure could be managed such that it poses no wider systemic risk warrants some attention. Still, it sounds too good to be true -- how is that possible?

Firstly, Roubini says that the risk of contagion has decreased since the failure of Lehman Brothers last year; in that respect, the stress tests have been helpful in letting investors differentiate between weak and strong institutions. And secondly, the fear of counterparty risk could be mitigated by having the government step in and act as the ultimate counterparty for all trades. This is the role of the clearinghouse in exchanges such as the CME (NYSE: CME  ) .

Finally, the government could guarantee depositors’ assets (to avoid bank runs), while allowing bank creditors to lose money -- who appear absolutely unwilling to consider.

Bring back old-fashioned market discipline
"Too big to fail" is itself a failed concept. The fear of the perceived consequences of a large bank failure is preventing us from imagining a framework within which authorities could unwind a failed institution with minimal disruption to capital markets and the economy. It’s high time authorities stopped hiding behind an idea that has become dogma and settled on a smaller -- albeit a critical, enabling role -- that would allow for the return of market discipline.

More Foolishness:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Take a hint from Warren Buffett’s recent investments in preferred shares with fat yields: In this market, dividends – those that are sustainable -- will be a big component of future shareholder returns. The team at Motley Fool Income Investor can show you how to build -- and manage -- a portfolio of stocks that pay a solid yield. To find out their top five recommendations for new money now, take advantage of a 30-day free trial today.

Alex Dumortier, CFA has a beneficial interest in Wells Fargo, but not in any of the other companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2009, at 7:41 PM, MyDonkey wrote:

    Roubini is wrong; the Big Banking oligarchy and its political puppets have said publicly that the 19 biggest banks will not be allowed to fail. And the biggest banks will continue to get bigger by swallowing smaller banks.

    A brilliant scheme is playing out to perfection: the oligarchy wins, and everybody else loses. End of story.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 895535, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/24/2012 5:20:58 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,529.75 33.60 0.27%
S&P 500 1,320.68 1.82 0.14%
NASD 2,839.38 -10.74 -0.38%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/24/2012 4:00 PM
STI $22.67 Down -0.18 -0.79%
SunTrust Banks, In… CAPS Rating: **
WFC $31.81 Up +0.07 +0.22%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
RF $6.33 Up +0.02 +0.32%
Regions Financial… CAPS Rating: ***
KEY $7.54 Up +0.01 +0.13%
KeyCorp CAPS Rating: ***
MS $13.31 Down -0.06 -0.45%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement