7 Stocks for Income

Cash accounts and CD yields are measured with a microscope. Long-term bonds have higher returns, but lock in low yields while the Federal Reserve is working feverishly to increase inflation. Investors looking for good yields that can outpace, or at least keep up with, inflation should consider stocks for at least part of their income solution.

The Motley Fool's CAPS screener went for a spin and identified several income-producing candidates using the settings listed below.

  • Current yield over 3.65% to top the 10-year Treasury.
  • Price-to-earnings ratio positive and less than 18.5 -- the average P/E of the S&P 500 as reported by Barron's.
  • Long-term debt-to-equity ratio less than 1. High debt loads make it tough to grow a dividend if business gets bumpy.
  • Market capitalization of over $1 billion. Large and mid-cap stocks aren't automatically safer than small caps, but larger companies are generally more established.
  • Earnings growth rate for the past three years greater than 4%. Earnings growth is key to being able to increase a dividend.
  • Current ratio greater than 1 to find companies with enough cash on hand to pay their bills.
  • Finally, a CAPS rating of four or five stars (out of five) to focus on companies our Foolish community believes are the best prospects.

The screen returned the seven stocks listed in the table below. Payout ratio and dividend growth were checked for each stock to look for signs of trouble and make sure the stocks caught in the screen were growing their payouts.

Company

Current Dividend Yield

EPS Growth Rate
(Past 3 Years)

P/E Ratio (TTM)

CAPS Rating
(out of 5)

Payout Ratio

Average Dividend Growth
(Past 5 Years)

Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT  ) 3.9% 9.5% 15.4 ***** 58% 9.9%
Alliance Resource Partners (Nasdaq: ARLP  ) 4.7% 12.8% 14.5 ***** 63% 14.7%
Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY  ) 5.2% 10.6% 14.1 **** 54% 2.9%
Kimberly-Clark (NYSE: KMB  ) 4.3% 3.7% 14.8 **** 59% 8.0%
Kraft Foods (NYSE: KFT  ) 3.8% 13.0% 12.8 **** 45% 5.9%
Public Service Enterprise Group (NYSE: PEG  ) 4.2% 7.4% 10.2 **** 42% 4.1%
Sysco (NYSE: SYY  ) 3.7% 3.9% 14.6 ***** 64% 10.3%

Source: Motley Fool screener results, Yahoo! Finance, and author's calculation. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Even though this list looks like a nice dividend portfolio, the results should be considered ideas for further research, not outright buy recommendations.

But in terms of diversification, the group looks attractive. The seven stocks cover a number of sectors. Abbott Labs and Bristol-Myers Squibb are health-care stocks, while Kimberly-Clark and Kraft Foods are well-known, blue-chip consumer giants. Alliance Resource Partners is a master limited partnership producing and marketing coal. Electric and natural gas utility Public Service Enterprise serves customers in the mid-Atlantic region. And Sysco provides food and supplies to restaurants, cafeterias and caterers.

Those are very different industries. But the companies all have one thing in common: stable businesses that aren't likely to see big swings with the economy. That makes them worth a closer look.

More dividend Foolishness:

Fool contributor Russ Krull owns shares of Sysco, but has no position in any other stocks mentioned. Sysco is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Alliance Resource Partners, Kimberly-Clark, and Sysco are Motley Fool Income Investor picks. Motley Fool Alpha owns shares of Abbott Laboratories. The Fool has a disclosure policy that produces dividends with every article.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (17)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 14, 2011, at 9:11 PM, ikkyu2 wrote:

    I like these names, although I always worry about big pharma - patent expirations combined with the always-open casino that is FDA approvals/rejections these days.

    Why didn't MO and PM make the cut? I notice that KFT, which was once part of that conglomerate, did - it spun off a hair more than 3 years ago. I suspect that the MO/PM split made the earnings numbers wonky and of course the screener knows nothing about splits.

  • Report this Comment On February 14, 2011, at 10:14 PM, rd80 wrote:

    Looks like PM and MO missed on the LT debt to equity ratio. Doesn't mean they wouldn't be great income holdings.

    That's one of the problems with a screen. Set the parameters tight and you get a reasonable number of hits, but exclude some good stocks.

  • Report this Comment On February 15, 2011, at 12:16 PM, westpoint13 wrote:
Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1441161, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/23/2014 11:11:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement