Can These High-Yield Energy Stocks Grow Their Distributions?

America's energy boom is reaching epic proportions. Consider the following:

  • The US just became the world's no. 1 oil producer, with record-breaking oil production of 11 million barrels/day (bpd).
  • North Dakota recently achieved 1 million bpd after growing its oil production 31% annually over the last seven years.
  • The Permian Basin is estimated to hold 75 billion barrels of recoverable oil (an estimate that is up 50% in the last year), making it the single largest oil deposit on earth.
Investors have been gravitating toward upstream oil and gas MLPs to profit from this historic megatrend, and for good reason. Numerous studies show that high-yielding companies that grow their dividends/distributions over time and have low volatility make the best long-term investments. 
With an average yield of 9.63%, a projected industry distribution growth rate of 9.4%, and volatility that is 26% less than the S&P 500, upstream MLPs look to be a promising industry for long-term income investors. 
What happens when a vital component of that magic formula is potentially lost, though? This article looks at three upstream energy companies, QR Energy (NYSE: QRE  ) , Linn Energy (NASDAQ: LINE  ) , and its non-partnership alternative Linn Co (NASDAQ: LNCO  ) , that have recently faced difficulty growing their distributions. My goal is to help long-term income investors determine whether or not these investments still deserve a place in your portfolio.
Troubled yield?
MLP Yield 10 year Projected Annual Distribution Growth Rate 12 Month Coverage Ratio Price/Standardized Measure Beta 10 Year Projected Annual Total Return
QR Energy 10.7% 2.01% 1.03 .61 0.65 12.71
Linn Energy 9.30% 1.27% 1.02 .88 0.66 10.57
Industry Average 9.63% 9.40% 1.05   0.74 19.03%
S&P 500 1.90%       1 9.20%

Sources: S&P Capital IQ,, Yahoo Finance,, SEC 10K filings

This table highlights the fact that though QR Energy and Linn Energy have high, safe yields, Wall Street analysts are expecting their distribution growth rates to remain very low through 2023. This results in QR Energy and Linn Energy trading at substantial discounts, indicated by the price/standardized measure ratio being under one. Since standardized measure is the estimated present value of future cash flows from oil and gas reserves, the market is either warning about trouble at QR Energy and Linn Energy, or offering a long-term buying opportunity. 
What's wrong with QR Energy?
QR Energy went public in December 2010 and has always been undervalued by the market -- for good reason. Under its previous general partner (gp) fee structure, management was paid in QR Energy units, resulting in dilution of up to 10% per quarter. This threatened the security of the distribution and made future growth difficult. QR Energy bought out its gp, which will result in a final 20% dilution that is spread out over four years, but that was immediately 7% accretive to distributable cash flow (DCF)/unit. This represented a potential catalyst for distribution growth, but QR Energy recently made a bold move that upset Wall Street and destroyed the goodwill of its gp buyout.
Since its IPO, QR Energy has made $1.4 billion in immediately accretive acquisitions. These were already producing assets that could be used to drive DCF growth. Upstream MLPs favor this approach over investing in new wells because investing in existing assets introduces greater risk and slows short-term distribution growth. 
QR Energy recently announced that instead of making more accretive acquisitions, it would raise its capital expenditure budget by 82% and invest in increasing production from what it considers low-risk assets. Distribution growth is unlikely to rise before the first expansion projects come online in 2016. This is a long-term strategy that is out of favor with short-term Wall Street thinking, and it leaves QR Energy massively undervalued and an incredible, though riskier, long-term income investment opportunity.
What's wrong with Linn Energy?
Linn Energy ran into trouble when its Berry Petroleum acquisition ended up costing $600 million more than expected. In addition, Linn Energy was left with 55,000 acres of Permian land afterwards with high drilling costs and high decline rates.
To an MLP that must pay out almost all of its earnings as distributions, the combination of high depletion and high drilling costs threatened the security of its distribution and reduced future distribution growth estimates to near zero. As a result, Linn Energy is trading at a discount to its standardized measure. Note that the discount is now far higher after two major deals, but Linn Energy releases standardized measure data once a year. 
To solve its growth problems, Linn Energy recently executed deals with ExxonMobil and Devon Energy. The Exxon deal was a swap of 25,000 acres of oil-rich but high depleting Permian land for 500,000 acres of gas-rich, low decline, and already producing Hugoton, KS acreage. The deal was immediately accretive to DCF by $30 million to $40 million per year and secured Linn Energy's distribution.
From Devon, Linn Energy bought 900,000 net acres that are producing 275 million cubic feet/day of gas with a decline rate of 14% for $2.3 billion. To pay for the deal, Linn Energy is selling Granite Wash acres with 40% decline rates. The two deals together will save Linn Energy $400 million in annual capital expenditures and will hopefully help to restore its historical 3%-4% distribution growth.

Foolish takeaway
QR Energy and Linn Energy represent safe, high-quality yields that are massively undervalued due to lack of market confidence in their distribution growth prospects. Linn Energy's recent deals give me confidence that it will be able to restore its distribution growth to historical levels. QR Energy is a riskier investment,  but its high, safe yield and deep discount offers immense long-term profit opportunity. 

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 22, 2014, at 10:03 AM, zorro6204 wrote:

    " . . . but that was immediately 7% accretive to distributable cash flow."

    It was accretive for 2014, before any of those 20% in units were created, it certainly won't be as they are. The reason QRE pumped their growth capex to the sky was that they have two dilution events happening in 2015, or the potential. The distribution on the preferreds steps up to parity with the common units in Q1, and one tranche of the management units becomes available.

    In order to handle the dilution, QRE must grow, but the miserable unit price makes it nearly impossible to make accretive acquisitions. Thus the capex. It's going to increase debt, and if the unit price doesn't come up, management just gets deeper into the box.

    I own it, because I bought in the $16's, but I sold half, and will sell the other half next tax year, because the prospects of distribution growth are slim and none, possibly for years.

    QR did not do enough modeling when they rolled this out, obviously. They had ambitions to do more of these, but in spite of a "vast" inventory of suitable drop-down properties, they haven't done a thing. Once burned.

  • Report this Comment On July 24, 2014, at 4:39 PM, AdamGalas wrote:

    Thank you for a very insightful comment.

    Today's bbep buyout of qre should benefit everyone involved and solve the growth problem.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3033266, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/29/2015 2:55:56 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Adam Galas

Adam Galas is an energy writer for The Motley Fool and a retired Army Medical Services Officer. After serving his country in the global war on terror, he has come home to serve investors by teaching them how to invest better in order to achieve their financial dreams.

Today's Market

updated 17 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 3:59 PM
LINE $3.30 Up +0.40 +13.79%
Linn Energy, LLC CAPS Rating: ***
LNCO $2.98 Up +0.37 +14.18%
Linn Co, LLC CAPS Rating: ***