Can These High-Yield Energy Stocks Grow Their Distributions?

Oil and gas MLPs are a great way for income investors to profit from America's historic energy boom. This article highlights three high-yielding upstream energy companies that have struggled to grow distributions lately in an effort to answer the question of whether investors should continue owning them.

Jul 22, 2014 at 9:41AM

America's energy boom is reaching epic proportions. Consider the following:

  • The US just became the world's no. 1 oil producer, with record-breaking oil production of 11 million barrels/day (bpd).
  • North Dakota recently achieved 1 million bpd after growing its oil production 31% annually over the last seven years.
  • The Permian Basin is estimated to hold 75 billion barrels of recoverable oil (an estimate that is up 50% in the last year), making it the single largest oil deposit on earth.
Investors have been gravitating toward upstream oil and gas MLPs to profit from this historic megatrend, and for good reason. Numerous studies show that high-yielding companies that grow their dividends/distributions over time and have low volatility make the best long-term investments. 
With an average yield of 9.63%, a projected industry distribution growth rate of 9.4%, and volatility that is 26% less than the S&P 500, upstream MLPs look to be a promising industry for long-term income investors. 
What happens when a vital component of that magic formula is potentially lost, though? This article looks at three upstream energy companies, QR Energy (NYSE: QRE), Linn Energy (NASDAQ:LINE), and its non-partnership alternative Linn Co (NASDAQ:LNCO), that have recently faced difficulty growing their distributions. My goal is to help long-term income investors determine whether or not these investments still deserve a place in your portfolio.
Troubled yield?
MLP Yield 10 year Projected Annual Distribution Growth Rate 12 Month Coverage Ratio Price/Standardized Measure Beta 10 Year Projected Annual Total Return
QR Energy 10.7% 2.01% 1.03 .61 0.65 12.71
Linn Energy 9.30% 1.27% 1.02 .88 0.66 10.57
Industry Average 9.63% 9.40% 1.05   0.74 19.03%
S&P 500 1.90%       1 9.20%

Sources: S&P Capital IQ,, Yahoo Finance,, SEC 10K filings

This table highlights the fact that though QR Energy and Linn Energy have high, safe yields, Wall Street analysts are expecting their distribution growth rates to remain very low through 2023. This results in QR Energy and Linn Energy trading at substantial discounts, indicated by the price/standardized measure ratio being under one. Since standardized measure is the estimated present value of future cash flows from oil and gas reserves, the market is either warning about trouble at QR Energy and Linn Energy, or offering a long-term buying opportunity. 
What's wrong with QR Energy?
QR Energy went public in December 2010 and has always been undervalued by the market -- for good reason. Under its previous general partner (gp) fee structure, management was paid in QR Energy units, resulting in dilution of up to 10% per quarter. This threatened the security of the distribution and made future growth difficult. QR Energy bought out its gp, which will result in a final 20% dilution that is spread out over four years, but that was immediately 7% accretive to distributable cash flow (DCF)/unit. This represented a potential catalyst for distribution growth, but QR Energy recently made a bold move that upset Wall Street and destroyed the goodwill of its gp buyout.
Since its IPO, QR Energy has made $1.4 billion in immediately accretive acquisitions. These were already producing assets that could be used to drive DCF growth. Upstream MLPs favor this approach over investing in new wells because investing in existing assets introduces greater risk and slows short-term distribution growth. 
QR Energy recently announced that instead of making more accretive acquisitions, it would raise its capital expenditure budget by 82% and invest in increasing production from what it considers low-risk assets. Distribution growth is unlikely to rise before the first expansion projects come online in 2016. This is a long-term strategy that is out of favor with short-term Wall Street thinking, and it leaves QR Energy massively undervalued and an incredible, though riskier, long-term income investment opportunity.
What's wrong with Linn Energy?
Linn Energy ran into trouble when its Berry Petroleum acquisition ended up costing $600 million more than expected. In addition, Linn Energy was left with 55,000 acres of Permian land afterwards with high drilling costs and high decline rates.
To an MLP that must pay out almost all of its earnings as distributions, the combination of high depletion and high drilling costs threatened the security of its distribution and reduced future distribution growth estimates to near zero. As a result, Linn Energy is trading at a discount to its standardized measure. Note that the discount is now far higher after two major deals, but Linn Energy releases standardized measure data once a year. 
To solve its growth problems, Linn Energy recently executed deals with ExxonMobil and Devon Energy. The Exxon deal was a swap of 25,000 acres of oil-rich but high depleting Permian land for 500,000 acres of gas-rich, low decline, and already producing Hugoton, KS acreage. The deal was immediately accretive to DCF by $30 million to $40 million per year and secured Linn Energy's distribution.
From Devon, Linn Energy bought 900,000 net acres that are producing 275 million cubic feet/day of gas with a decline rate of 14% for $2.3 billion. To pay for the deal, Linn Energy is selling Granite Wash acres with 40% decline rates. The two deals together will save Linn Energy $400 million in annual capital expenditures and will hopefully help to restore its historical 3%-4% distribution growth.

Foolish takeaway
QR Energy and Linn Energy represent safe, high-quality yields that are massively undervalued due to lack of market confidence in their distribution growth prospects. Linn Energy's recent deals give me confidence that it will be able to restore its distribution growth to historical levels. QR Energy is a riskier investment,  but its high, safe yield and deep discount offers immense long-term profit opportunity. 

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Adam Galas has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information