PeopleSoft: Oracle Plays Dirty

Recs

0

Just when you thought the Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL) and PeopleSoft (Nasdaq: PSFT) showdown couldn't get any uglier, the gloves have come off.

According to newly released excerpts of PeopleSoft's expanded lawsuit, Oracle's bid for the software company was allegedly designed to damage PeopleSoft and derail its now-completed acquisition of J.D. Edwards (Nasdaq: JDEC).

PeopleSoft's lawsuit includes Oracle employee emails that PeopleSoft says show the database giant's real intentions with its hostile takeover attempt. A day after Oracle announced its bid for PeopleSoft, an unidentified Oracle employee wrote, "We've certainly wounded PSFT... Even if we don't end up closing the deal, this is going to take PSFT some time to recover. And, of course, our corporate image of being aggressive, brash, and marching to the tune of a different drummer has been reinforced."

PeopleSoft also says that Oracle wanted to completely do away with PeopleSoft's products. An email from Oracle's executive vice president, Safra Catz, reads, "This is a really exciting opportunity for Oracle. Though we really won't be continuing their product line or combining operations, there will no doubt be challenges."

Oracle, however, had been open from the get-go about its intention not to continue to produce and sell PeopleSoft products. It said it would provide support for PeopleSoft's customers, but that's about it. Oracle would eventually try to switch those customers over to its own products.

Finally, PeopleSoft alleges that Oracle was hoping the uncertainties around the former's future would drive its share price down, thereby making Oracle's original $16-a-share bid seem more attractive. One email was quoted as saying, "The more something hurts PSFT, the more likely the share price drops and $16 starts to look better."

Oracle says that the emails are being taken out of context, and that this is simply another "diversionary move" by PeopleSoft. There's no hearing date set yet for PeopleSoft's case, and Oracle's $7.3 billion bid for the company is on hold until November, pending the Justice Department's antitrust investigation.

Like curious drivers unable to look away from a gruesome traffic accident, we keep getting pulled back into this drama. We can't wait to see the next episode.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 499024, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/11/2009 3:34:56 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Meet the Man Who Called the Meltdown

Related Tickers

11/11/2009 3:11 PM
ORCL $21.83 Up +0.03 +0.14%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Insurance agent: An insurance agent is the representative for an insurer. He may be an independent agent representing the products of a collection of insurance companies, or he may be a dedicated agent who represents a single company. Some agents specialize in selling certain kinds of policies such as life insurance, or annuities sold to individuals, or various kinds of insurance sold to small businesses or…

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!