E*Trade Bailout Signals Trouble Ahead

Several weeks back, shares in E*Trade Financial (Nasdaq: ETFC  ) fell more than 50% in a single day on rumors that mortgage exposure could lead the company to seek bankruptcy.

E*Trade sidestepped that outcome when hedge fund Citadel Investment Group purchased some $3 billion of E*Trade's debt. Yet a closer look at the deal reveals some useful insights into the likely future state of the mortgage-backed-securities market.

A weak floor
The value of the portfolio of troubled debt, which included collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) and mortgage-backed securities, suggests that Citadel paid about 27 cents on the dollar for these securities, a 73% discount to face value.

One of the most troubling aspects of the mortgage-backed-securities market is that no one really knew (or knows) how to properly value these securities -- not even the companies themselves. Valuing these instruments is so opaque that Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER  ) took asset writedowns equal to nearly twice the amount that management had forecast in the third quarter, or about $7.9 billion, versus forecasts of about $4.5 billion. This poor risk management ultimately led to the resignation of Merrill's CEO, Stan O'Neal.

The difficulty with proper valuation makes it highly likely that E*Trade simply let Citadel name its price for the portfolio of mortgages. Of course, E*Trade also knew that the alternative was to risk going under. So it becomes obvious that Citadel's purchase price was a rock-bottom offer and therefore represents a very good floor price for such securities going forward.

Ultimately, an asset is worth only what the next guy is willing to pay for it. And some of the recent toxic waste that was neatly packaged into CDOs still means that these instruments are still very difficult to value. Still, the Citadel purchase does offer a floor for what these securities could be worth.

Not a pretty picture
If Citadel's price for E*Trade's debt were applied to Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) and Merrill, the picture wouldn't look very pretty, because these two giants hold a ton of mortgage-backed securities. According to a recent Wall Street Journal article, titled "Citadel May Have Set Template," Citigroup would end up with a total asset charge of some $26 billion, based on the company's holdings of $55 billion in CDO assets. Similarly, Merrill Lynch would be subject to total losses of $9 billion, which would include the already announced $7.9 billion writedown.

These are staggering figures. However, they're not likely to occur. For one thing, it's not accurate to assume that Citigroup's CDOs are similar to those at E*Trade, Merrill, or even Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) , which seems to have weathered the storm quite nicely. What's more, CDOs are not standardized products. They're different at each firm. That's what makes it hard to value in the first place.

Second, Citigroup is much bigger and stronger than E*Trade, which sold off its debt at rock-bottom prices in an attempt to appease shareholders. Citigroup, in contrast, would probably not face such a dire situation. In addition, Citigroup's CDO portfolio includes some $25 billion in "super senior" notes that, although probably worth less than face value, given what we know about "triple A" ratings these days, are probably worth more than 27 cents on the dollar.

Still a scary scenario
Nonetheless, companies with heavy loads of CDO-type assets still have a lot of balance-sheet cleaning to do. Valuation is hazy at best, too, and securities markets hate uncertainty. Sometimes, that kind of revulsion leads to amazing investment opportunities when the high uncertainty is coupled with low risk. Yet in the CDO market, the situation is high in both uncertainty and risk. In this situation, you're better off leaving these investments to the most seasoned investors.

For further related Foolishness:


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (16)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 05, 2009, at 9:14 PM, sazabo wrote:

    etrade is the worst run bank that I have seen. Not only would I not bank here. I am in the process of moving all of my money out of there bank and security. Customer service in India.

    Short Short Short

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 551749, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/17/2014 5:25:41 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement