This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Recs

4

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the worst ...
For solar power investors, bad news has come in buckets these past few weeks. Plunging polysilicon prices. Contracting credit markets. Shrinking state subsidies. And downgrades -- oh, so many downgrades. But up on Wall Street, at least one investor has not yet abandoned all hope in this strange realm it's entered. Yesterday, beleaguered banking behemoth JPMorgan clambered way out on a limb and begged to differ with its fellow analysts, arguing that all is not yet lost in the solar space.

Despite downgrading Evergreen Solar (Nasdaq: ESLR) and Ascent Solar (Nasdaq: ASTI) yesterday, JPMorgan reiterated its support for solar installer SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWRA) and initiated coverage of thin-film star First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR) with a "buy" rating.

Let's go to the tape
Why would we care what JP thinks? Good question. Fact is, this megabanker isn't so good when it comes to picking winning stocks, getting 55% of the picks tracked by CAPS wrong and ranking in the bottom quintile among CAPS investors. In the solar-related field alone, JP's scorecard already includes a couple of sizeable losers:

Company

JPMorgan Said:

CAPS Says (out of 5):

JPMorgan's Pick Lagging S&P 500 by:

Applied Materials (Nasdaq: AMAT)

Outperform

*****

9 points

MEMC Electronic (NYSE: WFR)

Outperform

****

38 points

But while its record fails to impress, when you read this banker's report, the logic rings true. According to JP, there's a flight to quality underway -- with "quality" being defined as cash-generating capacity. The banker predicts a 25% drop in prices for solar components and systems in 2009, which will cause "margin compression at all levels of the solar energy food chain." The industry's due for a shakeout, and in JP's view, only those firms capable of cutting their capital expenditures, and producing free cash flow to remain solvent, are worth investing in.

In this regard, JP doesn't think either Evergreen or Ascent is up to the task -- hence, the sell ratings. In contrast, while neither Sunpower nor First Solar currently generates positive free cash flow, both do generate positive cash from operations -- leaving open the possibility that if they cut their capital budgets to the bone, they may emerge from this crisis intact.

While not strictly solar (Applied Materials sells equipment used by solar companies, while MEMC makes the starting material for solar cells), these companies do generate positive cash from operations and are actually free cash flow-positive as well. However, Motley Fool Rule Breakers fave Suntech Power (NYSE: STP), is not generating positive free cash flow.

Foolish takeaway
JPMorgan's discovery of the virtue of cash warms the very cockles of my Foolish heart. Fact is, the only reason I don't own any solar stocks today is because I've yet to find a pure play in the space that has significant free cash flow to back up its attractive GAAP P/E ratio.

And in fact, I have my doubts that First Solar and Sunpower will fulfill JP's dreams. Maybe they can cut capital spending fast enough to generate the cash profits that underpin JP's investment thesis. Maybe not. If I were playing the solar sector, I'd "trust but verify" this point before committing funds.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Suntech Power Holdings is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. JPMorgan Chase is an Income Investor choice.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 2204 out of more than 120,000 members. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 19, 2008, at 3:47 PM, friscoflyr wrote:

    I fail to understand how plunging polysilicon prices are bad for solar. Not long ago we were being told that high polysilicon prices were bad for solar.

    Anything that brings down the cost of solar is a positive in the big picture. Of course analysts rarely look at the big picture.

    You don't need to go very far out on a limb to see that solar will be huge in coming years. Solar may be having early growing pains now, but we are talking about a fundamental change in how the world gets power. As soon as cap and trade is in place, the true cost of fossil fuels will be evident.

    In the U.S. you will see subsidies increase, not decrease. The decrease in subsidies in place like Spain are already well factored into solar stock prices, and then some.

    And you will see a national renewable energy requirement for utilities like what California has now.

    The era of oil company lobbyists running the EPA , the Dept of Interior and censoring of science by the administration are over.

    The era of misleading the public about climate change and the potential of renewable energy is over. The Heartland Institute and it's handful of climate science skeptics and hundreds of non scientist skeptics will lose their ability to fool the public. They won't have an administration that abets this crime. The people will wake up to the fact that the science of global warming is getting more certain, not less. Ideology will no longer trump science and common sense.

    Instead of hearing about Senator Inhofe's phoney list of skeptical scientists, and the phoney hoax know as the Oregon petition and phoney scientific meetings of skeptics sponsored by Heartland Institute and AEI, we will start to hear straight talk. And instead of hearing the lies about how renewable energy can't power the country, we will be shown how it can and how it will power the country.

    http://energysolutionswecanbelievein.blogspot.com

    my blog

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 779165, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/11/2009 10:45:58 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
What to Buy? Stocks, Bonds, or Gold?

Related Tickers

11/11/2009 10:28 AM
STP $13.27 Up +0.21 +1.61%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ****
WFR $13.15 Up +0.22 +1.70%
MEMC Electronic Ma… CAPS Rating: *****
AMAT $13.35 Up +0.35 +2.70%
Applied Materials,… CAPS Rating: ****
ASTI $4.83 Up +0.16 +3.32%
Ascent Solar Techn… CAPS Rating: ***
ESLR $1.46 Up +0.02 +1.39%
Evergreen Solar, I… CAPS Rating: ***
FSLR $119.80 Down -0.10 -0.08%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Defined-benefit plan: A defined-benefit plan is a retirement arrangement in which an eligible retired employee receives specified payouts from his former employer throughout retirement. The employer is responsible for managing the money to be able to make these pension payments, so the payouts can be reduced or eliminated if circumstances warrant.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!