Will Terrestrial Radio Get Sirius?

Recs

15

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Since 2002, David and Tom Gardner have returned 28.72% while the S&P 500 returned -11.25%. Try Stock Advisor free for 30 days.

Stock Advisor

Are local radio stations gearing up to make a play for Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI)?

Let's hope not.

"We should buy Sirius XM Radio," writes Dave Wilson in a Radio World commentary. By "we," he means a consortium of local AM and FM operators; Wilson owns a pair of radio stations in North Carolina. He also serves as a director in the Consumer Electronics Association.

"While at first the idea of buying out Sirius XM may sound crazy to many, so did the concept of merging both satellite companies two years ago," he argues.

Yes, this would cost less than $4 billion, factoring in the current value of the company's stock and outstanding debt. Wilson's plan is for terrestrial radio operators to collectively buy Sirius XM, with stakes commensurate to their percentage of FCC regulatory fees.

"Too bad it'll never happen," suggests All Things Digital's John Paczkowski, and rightfully so.

It's hard enough to get one company to come to terms on a buyout. Imagine trying to persuade all the local radio operators -- many in dire financial straits, no doubt -- to cough up six to seven figures apiece for a chunk of satellite radio.

It's just never going to happen. And what would terrestrial operators do with satellite radio?

You really don't want to know. Wilson's plan is to transform satellite radio into a free platform, presumably selling ads on what are now "commercial-free" channels while leasing out a chunk of the available channels in an auction. He compares his proposed model to what cable companies are doing, but I should point out that cable operators charge far more for their subscriptions than the $13 a month that Sirius and XM demand of their subscribers.

Naturally, giving away satellite radio would mean that Wilson's crew would have to spend even more than $4 billion to reimburse the existing subscribers who have forked over for lifetime subscriptions, or have prepaid for years of service at a discounted rate.

Don't get me wrong. I can definitely see terrestrial and satellite radio in bed together … eventually. Two months ago, I suggested that the larger conventional broadcasters like CBS (NYSE: CBS), Clear Channel, and Cox Radio (NYSE: CXR) may be serious bidders for Sirius XM's assets, if the company is forced into bankruptcy next year. I took a softer stance last week, suggesting that Sirius XM should just consider raising needed capital by syndicating more content through terrestrial radio.

Either way, while a single terrestrial operator may one day own a chunk -- if not all -- of Sirius XM, all of the AM and FM stations will never collectively own their satellite counterparts.

Sirius XM isn't closing in on 20 million subscribers -- and Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) hasn't moved even more iPods -- because terrestrial radio is doing a banner job in providing the music and talk that consumers want to hear. Sorry, Wilson. I can appreciate anyone willing to think outside of the box, but some ideas are better left all boxed up.

Follow along with the Global Gains team as they travel to key business centers in China to uncover the very best investing opportunities! Sign up here to receive their FREE dispatches from the road.

Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. This is a great time to be in the market; we'll show you why and we'll show you how.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz is a subscriber to both Sirius and XM. He does not own shares in any company mentioned in this story. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 31, 2008, at 12:41 PM, splintar wrote:

    Rick -

    How in the world do you think the Dem gov't will now let any terrestrial company get a piece of SAT RAD. Unless it is broken up. It was hard enough for SAT RAD to merge. You are dreaming if you thing any broadcaster will be allowed to own SAT RAD.

    But it won't break itself up in a bankruptcy. It will find a bridge loan and partner the break up with the lender, because the assets will go for a lot more on the open bidding market than under the terms of a bankruptcy fire sale.

    Very unlikely scenario. Unfortunately, for all the detractors, the most likely scenario is a refi and a reverse split until continued CFBE. Everything all the other companies will hate to see happen and are fighting hard to avoid.

  • Report this Comment On December 31, 2008, at 12:46 PM, KarmaKilla wrote:

    Thank you. I found your article after reading that tripe and it was a breath of fresh air. Dave Wilson has his head up his ass, sirius subscriptions are growing along with their revenue. They are in the midst of re-financing, and in a recession they'll probably get a pretty good deal. Sirius XM have been paying off billions of dollars worth of debt that was spent on the massive infrastructure satellite radio requires to operate. And unlike terrestrial radio, Sirius is not losing listeners.

    The economic failures of the American auto industry has indeed put a thorn in their sides. However the 2006 deal Sirius made with Audi, Volvo, and Mercedes has come into full swing and are picking up where the Americans failed.

    Terrestrial radio should be worried more than Sirius XM. Cable destroyed free-air broadcast, and hopefully the day will come where commercial ridden bad talk radio is deemed inferior to satellite service.

    Nobody except your grandmother uses an antenna to watch tv.

  • Report this Comment On December 31, 2008, at 1:04 PM, bascott729 wrote:

    Listen, they need to calm down. They're already past the halfway mark. Howard Stern has 2 years left on his contract and he will not re-sign. At least not in a long-term, week long format.

    He constantly complains now about the schedule and has said if he continues with Sirius it will be a in a smaller capacity. And to be honest, his show is getting really boring. And the supposed 4 minutes of commercials an hour has slowly creeped up to about 20 minutes again and in '09 I'm sure it will increase again. By the time his current contract is up, I would bet he'll be averaging 50% commercials or more. Between ad time, poor content, and long vacation periods, it really seems the audience is getting tired of it.

    I'd love to see the number of subscribers they've lost since 1/9/06. Sure the merger was a boost, but how long will it sustain them?

    Terrestrial radio needs to simply hunker down and wait it out. Sirius and XM are simply the modern laser disc. Seems really cool at first, but not cost effective, especially in a bad economy.

    In the meantime, radio needs to start finding and developing strong talents again. Developing means not firing a promising voice after 3 months because he's not pulling Stern-like ratings already They are just as responsible for their own recent hard times as sattelite radio is.

    p.s. I'm available and I'll work cheap . . . the first year!

  • Report this Comment On December 31, 2008, at 1:11 PM, YIF wrote:

    Why doesn't Google buy Sirius? Good distribution channel, Goog has deep pockets and can take care of their debt problems.

  • Report this Comment On January 01, 2009, at 1:14 AM, splintar wrote:

    Good lord Aristotle. Only 4 comments. I guess people have learned not to read your garbage anymore. Your thoughts?

    That is such a wonderful middle name. You should really make sure to use it all the time.

    It really separates you and makes you special.

  • Report this Comment On January 01, 2009, at 4:48 AM, chopperjack wrote:

    What about Microsoft? Bill said he wanted to compete with the I phone. Sirius XM Radio on your phone? Tons of software opportunity for Microsoft in this mix.

  • Report this Comment On January 01, 2009, at 3:03 PM, mudar123 wrote:

    An article about Sirius "sweat shops" in Korea :

    http://news.infoshop.org/article.php?story=2009010102181713

    I'm a radio fan (TV no good ;-) , considering Sirius subscribtion last year, but not anymore...

  • Report this Comment On January 02, 2009, at 9:24 PM, Emaculate wrote:

    How about a possible merger with Apple and offering up services with the sale of ipods and iphones?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 802429, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/14/2009 7:10:44 AM

Keep Reading:

“Will Terrestrial Radio Get Sirius? ”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Get involved! »

Most Popular Articles

  1. The New Subprime6 days ago
  2. What the U.S. Needs: A New Tax System?5 days ago
  3. GM: This Stock Is Worthless3 days ago
Jul 13 at 4:01 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,331.68 +185.16 +2.27%
S&P 500 901.05 +21.92 +2.49%
NASD 1,793.21 +37.18 +2.12%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Sirius XM Radio

CAPS Rating 2/5 Stars

$0.38

+0.01 (+1.74%)

Outperform3621

Underperform893

Rate This Stock