Rocket Stock or Dud?

Recs

5

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

"The bigger they are, the harder they fall." It's the worst nightmare of every investor in today's market -- buying a rocket stock just before it takes a nosedive.

Now I readily admit that sometimes, stocks rise for a reason. But sometimes, the rise becomes the reason. No matter how often we caution them not to, investors do have a habit of buying "hot" stocks, and trusting momentum to keep 'em moving upwards.

Problem is, if the price goes up too much, even a great company can turn into a lousy investment. Below I list a few stocks that may have done just that. Stocks that have more than doubled since the beginning of this year, and just might be ripe to fall back to earth.

Stock

Recent Price

CAPS Rating
(out of 5)

Ingersoll-Rand (NYSE: IR)

$35.24

*****

Dendreon

$27.24

**

Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL)

$43.28

**

Sprint-Nextel (NYSE: S)

$3.75

**

NetApp (Nasdaq: NTAP)

$30.83

**

Companies are selected by screening for 100% and higher price appreciation year-to-date on finviz.com. Five stars = highest possible CAPS rating; one star = lowest. Recent price and CAPS ratings from Motley Fool CAPS.

Each of these stocks has already won big this year, but how many of them can keep on winning? Our 145,000 CAPS members don't seem too optimistic about most of these companies continuing this year's winning streak into the New Year. There is one stock, however, that we believe can keep on powering higher: Ingersoll-Rand.

Blast-off ... or flame-out?
A student of history, CAPS member Bojacked recently opined that just as: "rebuilding the infrastructure" helped pull America out of the Great Depression," so too will "Obama's plan to rebuild America" put an end to the Great Recession. Which brings us to Ingersoll, which: "manufactures things like equipment to build roads and major industrial machinery."

VUCommodore reaches a similar conclusion, following Warren Buffett's lead to get there: "This Berkshire (NYSE: BRK-A) holding boasts a substantial dividend yield, and has the necessary financial strength to weather a short to medium term 'double dip' in the economy."

How will Ingersoll survive a recession that has tripped up so many other companies? CAPS All-Star edwjm cites the strength of diversity, arguing last summer that: "This is no one trick pony, but is diversified into several different industries." edwjm also likes the firm's "improved ... balance sheet," and believes that Ingersoll "should see good growth from its strong position in the climate control industry."

So just how "improved" is Ingersoll's balance sheet? And what will it be growing in the quarters and years to come? Well, let's take a look at the financials and find out.

With more than $740 million in cash, and $4.1 billion in debt, Ingersoll's balance sheet isn't exactly clean as a whistle, but it doesn't look too much more heavily leveraged than either Honeywell (NYSE: HON) or Johnson Controls (NYSE: JCI).

Profits-wise, however, Ingersoll is coming off a rough 2008 -- and to the extent we can rely on forward earnings estimates, its future doesn't look much brighter. Ingersoll's 15.7 forward P/E compares unfavorably to the lower valuations on its two larger rivals. Likewise, consensus estimates of 6% long-term growth at Ingersoll lag projections for both Honeywell and Johnson (in the latter case, by a considerable margin.)

Foolish takeaway
True, P/E ratios rarely tell the whole story about a stock. Even as it reports net losses under GAAP, Ingersoll has $1.6 billion in free cash flow to its credit over the last 12 months (and indeed, is GAAP-profitable through the first three quarters of this year.)

But this still leaves the firm trading for an enterprise value nearly 10 times as large as its free cash flow -- too pricey for its growth rate, to my Foolish eye. And with a miniscule dividend of just 0.8% -- again trailing its rivals -- I have to tell you: The more I look at Ingersoll, the less I like it. To me, this stock is no rocket. It's a dud, through and through.

But just because I think so doesn't mean you have to agree. Here at the Fool, we're open to all opinions on the stocks we discuss -- and we'd love to hear yours. Click on over to Motley Fools CAPS now, and tell us what you think.

Love this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Berkshire Hathaway is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation and Inside Value choice (the latter honor being shared by Sprint). The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 819 out of more than 145,000 members. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Shockthefool wrote:

    Puhleeze already! When I read how anyone thinks that "deficit governmental spending will end the Great Recession," I want to cringe. Such did not end the Great Depression. Roosevelt's "alphabet soup" of programs - CCC, WPA, et al, had little or no effect on the economy. Rather, the fiscal policy of doubling the fixed exchange rate of the dollar to the gold standard stabilized the banks and made it easier for them to lend. Similarly, Obama trillion dollar deficits will only make things, from a financial viewpoint, worse. (Granted it does do one thing - it makes people think that something is being done so psychologically it's good). The Fed and the Treasury cannot peg to gold but can ease the reins on money supply, which they have done. BUT, TARP, meant to protect the banks and the economy, has actually throttled back the recovery. (The banks have money to lend but are afraid or constrained to do so).

    Depending on a stock to feed off governmental stimulus is very short-sighted. Might be okay for short-term investment, but longs need to beware.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Fool wrote:

    IR does not really rely on the road portion of its business. Henkl has spent years distancing himself from it. And people still consistently view IR like a Caterpillar. Obama's rebuild America will not affect IR

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1055059, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/9/2010 10:45:47 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is This Bull Over?

By The Motley Fool

Is This Bull Over?

Related Tickers

2/9/2010 4:03 PM
TSL $23.13 Up +0.02 +0.09%
Trina Solar Limite… CAPS Rating: **
BRK-A $111700.00 Up +589.00 +0.53%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
IR $33.56 Up +0.68 +2.07%
Ingersoll-Rand Com… CAPS Rating: *****
JCI $28.13 Up +0.41 +1.48%
Johnson Controls,… CAPS Rating: ****
S $3.65 Up +0.14 +3.99%
Sprint Nextel Corp CAPS Rating: **
NTAP $31.01 Up +0.49 +1.61%
NetApp CAPS Rating: **
HON $37.82 Up +0.95 +2.58%
Honeywell Internat… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Long term: Long term. Under Federal tax code, capital gains are eligible for the special 15% tax rate if the property was owned more than one year. If the time of ownership was less than one year, gains are taxed as short term capital gains at ordinary income tax rates.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!