Ken Lewis: A Fraudster, or Just Stupid?

Recs

30

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Poor Ken Lewis thought he could escape the wrath of shareholders and lawyers by quietly slipping into retirement from his post as Bank of America's (NYSE: BAC) former CEO.

Whoops.

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo slapped Lewis and B of A's former CFO (and still employed) Joe Price with civil securities fraud charges stemming from the late-2008 deal to buy Merrill Lynch.

Cuomo's claims go something like this:

  • Lewis and Price didn't properly disclose Merrill's losses before shareholders voted to sign the deal.
  • They then strong-armed taxpayers into coughing up some $20 billion to help close the deal, threatening regulators that they'd walk unless a big check was written.

"That is just a fraud"
That's what Cuomo said this morning.

But is it? Here's how I see it: Ken Lewis spent almost a decade making massive acquisitions (MBNA, LaSalle, FleetBoston) in order to become as big and burly as Citigroup (NYSE: C) and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM). For the most part, they worked -- easy money and a booming economy made these deals look like winners.

That gave him undue self-confidence that he was some sort of deal lord, able to buy whatever he wanted for any ludicrous price -- and make it work. (My colleague Matt Koppenheffer gives more detail on these deals here.)

That confidence peaked in 2008 with the Merrill acquisition. Lewis paid a 70% premium to Merrill's previous closing price, and no one -- no one -- could figure out why. This was the same week both Lehman Brothers and AIG (NYSE: AIG) bit the dust. There isn't a single sober person who doesn't think Merrill would have been the next to go. Lewis could have offered John Thain (a former Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) exec who was Merrill's then CEO) a few pennies, a cold beer, and maybe an Amazon gift card, and he would have bit. He had to. There was no other option: For Merrill, it was take what B of A offered, or go bankrupt. Ken Lewis just happened to graciously offer a dump truck full of gold -- nearly $50 billion.

Lewis's second (and more serious) fault was buying Merrill to begin with. This is really simple, folks: The reason Wall Street was in hysteria was because everyone finally realized that banks were black boxes of complexity that no one -- not accountants, not lawyers, not bankers -- could decipher. You didn't need inside information to know this. It was in all the papers.

The pillar of this was the sudden awareness that measuring risk was proven beyond doubt to be a faulty, if not preposterous, science. Yet as the bombs were being dropped, Lewis somehow calculated that buying Merrill was an attractive risk to take. And he calculated this impossibility in 24 hours flat.

Here's how I put it last year:

If downside risk in a deal is large enough that it could turn your firm into sawdust, it's not a risk worth taking. And if a CEO is unable to accurately price risk in the first place, the deal should be avoided like the plague. Lewis either took an enormously stupid risk, or he didn't understand the risk to begin with -- both of which seem like grounds for getting the boot.

In any case, here's the deal: Is Lewis a fraudster? I'd say no (and mind you, these are civil, not criminal, charges). All the evidence shows he just made an outrageously stupid decision. Did he harm shareholder by not disclosing losses? For a while, yes. But Lewis is a major shareholder himself. Did he harm taxpayers, who helped finance the deal? Absolutely, but the financing was hardly free. And none of the actions he's charged with benefited him. If he's a fraudster, he isn't a very smart one.

I'm just glad he's gone.

“The Death of the Euro!”…Greece may seem worlds away, but be warned. What happens there next could reshape global finance and rattle your portfolio. On Mar. 22, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson heads to Greece to get the story. Follow in real time and hear how best to profit from this historic development (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 117%!). Enter email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Amazon.com is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 5:16 PM, ebpvet wrote:

    I read the entire civil complaint, all 75 pages. I am flabbergasted. The arrogance, the flagrant incompetence, malfeasance, misfeasance, lying to the "owners" while collecting and doling out millions.. no billions in salaries and bonuses.

    This is NOT STUPID, it is CRIMINAL.

    This should not be a civil complaint. Those crooks should go to jail AFTER their pockets and bank accounts are EMPTIED.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 6:11 PM, ET69 wrote:

    Agreed!

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 6:41 PM, snapperreef wrote:

    And everyone wanted to put Ken Lay and the Enron guys in prison.

    The money lost costs of the class warfare business have gone way up since then.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2010, at 7:21 PM, TomEarnest wrote:

    Board of Directors should go to jail, as should others. All money needs to be confiscated. Not only did they milk shareholders, US citizens, but they they also mismanaged the assets of many of their customers who invested with them (bad advice they knew was not appropriate for individual investors). These guys give honest investment advisors a bad name.

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 12:43 AM, WTHAmIDoing wrote:

    Ok – I’ll play the devil’s advocate. As a shareholder I guess I would have a right to complain but I won't. I only started to invest in Bank of America after the Merrill purchase was locked and to be honest the primary reason for that was BECAUSE of that purchase. Ken Lewis viewed the acquisition as a long term investment, that was never any secret and I could see the benefits even back then. While I’ll agree that the price was higher that it probably should have been my understanding was that Lewis paid the premium to ensure the brand was preserved as it was “the crown jewel” that the board had been coveting for years. The benefits of pairing the "Thundering Herd" to its massive deposit base has obvious advantages and that is what convinced me. Also, I’m not sure if you’ve followed the financial reports but to me it looks to me like the majority of problems the bank had throughout 2009 were credit related and the Merrill component seemed to do a good job of minimizing that impact throughout the year.

    Sorry but I don't buy into the argument that the taxpayers got a bad deal with this “bailout”. It was a loan and it was repaid with interest. Whinge all you want but the taxpayers came billions of dollars ahead via dividends on that deal.

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 10:18 AM, miteycasey wrote:

    I vote for stupid.

    He paid a 70% premium. That just proves it.

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Pisssssedoff1 wrote:

    Unbelievable, how do i recoup the money Iost on call options I sold on Merrill at 17.50 Will Thain and Lewis at least take me to dinner before they _ _ _ _ _ _!

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 2:17 PM, TeaPartyPatriot wrote:

    In the battle between good and evil (capitalism/free market society vs. d-crat marxism-socialism) we have seen where business "leaders" stand. There are the PINHEADS, like Benedict Arnold traitor and spineless, gutless fool Ken Lewis, and there are PATRIOTS, like Thomas Donohue, head of the US Chamber of Commerce.

    In this war for the future of American free enterprise, we need all the PATRIOTS we can get.

  • Report this Comment On February 05, 2010, at 11:28 PM, xetn wrote:

    If there had not been any bailouts, these kinds of transactions would not have happened in the first place. Why should the taxpayers be forced, at the point of a gun, to pay for all the blunders of the past decades? That is the real criminal action. In a real free market this would never have happened, nor would we have a Fed, and IRS or any of the other ABC bureaucracies that do nothing but rent seek. .

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2010, at 1:49 PM, twinsix wrote:

    Spot on !

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2010, at 1:56 PM, twinsix wrote:

    And, the clearest example of the "Richard Nixon syndrome" tragedy seen in many CEO failures. Sayonara to Mr. Lewis and his mentor.

  • Report this Comment On February 07, 2010, at 9:24 AM, d4winds wrote:

    Stupidity or fraud? Both. First came the stupidity, then the fraud to cover it up.

  • Report this Comment On February 07, 2010, at 1:58 PM, DonkeyJunk wrote:

    TeaPartyPatriot has been swallowed up by right-wing conglomerate FOX news and Bill O'Reilly.

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2010, at 3:17 PM, mikecart1 wrote:

    I actually like Ken Lewis. Am I the only one?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1103746, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 3/21/2010 2:28:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 10,741.98 -37.19 -0.35%
S&P 500 1,159.90 -5.92 -0.51%
NASD 2,374.41 -16.87 -0.71%

Related Tickers

3/19/2010 4:03 PM
AIG $34.80 Up +0.16 +0.46%
American Internati… CAPS Rating: **
BAC $16.82 Down -0.26 -1.52%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
C $3.90 Down -0.12 -2.99%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
GS $177.90 Up +0.45 +0.25%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
JPM $43.45 Down -0.19 -0.44%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Sharpe ratio: The Sharpe ratio is a measure of how well an investment compensates the investor for the risk assumed in making the investment.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!