Recs

18

Is Microsoft Really Clueless?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

From A (Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) as a competitor) to Z (Zune), Microsoft (NYSE: MSFT  ) is having a tough time of it these days. Many of its products are busts, and management has been called clueless. All this negativity is no doubt depressing the stock price as well.

What the heck is going on in Redmond? Are things really as bad as they seem? Can Mr. Softy get his hard edge back and reward shareholders like me?

Having a blunderful time
Microsoft's most notable blunders have come mostly in the consumer products category. You know, those things we consumers really tend to notice. Like how the original Zune MP3 player -- that brown, featureless block -- failed to capture the imagination of anyone outside the brick-laying industry. Microsoft had to compete with the form, function, and aesthetics of Apple's iPod, and came up short. Zune is still around (and a bit sleeker), but it's hardly made a dent in the consumer consciousness.

Or the Kin phones: "OMG, LOL!" as the kids say today. Not even two months after launch, Microsoft threw Kin on the barbie, and killed the phones. While Apple sold 1.7 million iPhone 4s in three days, there are reports of fewer than 10,000 Kins in circulation.

This is a bad omen as the company is preparing to launch the Windows Phone 7 mobile OS in the coming months. Phones based on this software will start at a serious disadvantage to iPhones, Research In Motion's (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) BlackBerrys, and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) Android-based devices. When carriers such as AT&T (NYSE: T  ) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) decide where to place their marketing muscle, do you think they'll go with the proven winners, or a proven loser in the mobile space? One Microsoft executive told the New York Times that Verizon employees were reluctant to sell the Kin, promoting Android phones instead. It's going to take a lot to overcome this kind of thinking.

There are other disappointments, of course. From tablet computers to Windows Vista, Mr. Softy has been tagged as mediocre. Lukewarm. Boring. Aside from the Xbox gaming platform, it's tough to come up with anything that's generating positive buzz.

First, the good news
The bright side of all this is these consumer products mean nothing to Microsoft's bottom line. If you look at the table below, you'll see that over three-fourths of the company's revenue and nearly all of its profits come from the non-consumer business side -- Windows Server software, Microsoft Office products, etc. -- and its stranglehold on PC operating systems with the likes of Windows 7, XP, and Vista. Here's a breakdown by segment:

Segment

TTM Revenue

TTM Profit*

Windows and Windows Live

22%

42%

Server and Tools

24%

23%

Online Services

4%

-11%

Microsoft Business

31%

51%

Entertainment and Devices

13%

3%

*Operating profit before tax.
Not all segments are listed. Totals will not sum to 100%. Data provided by Capital IQ.

For a company that raked in over $20 billion in free cash flow over the past year, these product failures can hardly be viewed as catastrophic. Thousands of companies wish they had Microsoft's problems (along with the $37 billion it has in the bank)!

So investors should look at these consumer-facing products as management does -- relatively small bets, placed in the hope they turn out to be big winners.

And now, the bad
While we investors should applaud these bets, we should also be worrying that none of them is really paying off. It's gone beyond what we could rationally view as a random streak of bad luck. The Kin debacle points out that management really is clueless about many things. This seems to be a company that's out of touch and hurting for creative minds.

What's more, Google in particular is pressuring Mr. Softy even in its strongest areas. "That Google has made Microsoft its whipping boy in online search is hardly news," notes our own Motley Fool Inside Value. "More troubling, though, are Microsoft's rival's attacks and rapid ascents in key competitive arenas." These include the Google Chrome Web browser, Google Docs and Apps, and the upcoming Google Chrome operating system. All these products are free and have to affect Microsoft's pricing power.

Buy, hold, or sell?
Because of its dominance in operating systems and the business space, this is a rather low-risk stock with limited downside. Cash-producing machines like this are few and far between. If you think management can get its act together and regain some of the old Microsoft magic, the current price -- around $24 and10.5 times forward earnings -- is a fine entry point.

However, I have my doubts about the magic returning to Redmond any time soon. I'm fine holding my shares for the time being, but once a better opportunity comes along (and they usually do, on a regular basis) they'll be among the first I sell.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool analyst Rex Moore brought orange slices for the entire team. Of the companies mentioned in this article, he owns shares of Microsoft. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on Microsoft. The Fool owns shares of Google. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 4:52 PM, ericAZ2CA wrote:

    I agree with this perspective. So what would fix it? Innovation! Other companies have it, why doesn't Microsoft? There was nothing original about Windows XP, nothing original about Vista and now Windows 7 is just the same old thing repackaged.

    Their other flagship product, Office, hasn't had any interesting new features added in years and years. The last one most of us remember is the paperclip. And we know how that worked out.

    "Clueless" is an understatement. I develop web enterprise applications for a living and when we test in the browsers Firefox and Safari "just work" and it's always IE that needs special attention. Microsoft is not only a clueless Tech company, but they're causing a serious hindrance to progress with their business practices.

    These guys wrote something amazing about Microsoft that regularly does the keynote address for the CES shows in Vegas every year. http://www.erixclix.com/2010/01/06/ces-keynote-typical-micro...

    Unbelievable. My company left this bandwagon years ago.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 5:21 PM, zymok wrote:

    Microsoft has never been an innovative company. Rather, MSFT was built on two talents. The first is the ability to recognize other people's good ideas and co-opt them, either by buying the competing company or producing an in-house (often mediocre) competing product. The second is marketing - the ability to bundle products and place them so as to achieve increasing market share. This worked very well for them while the PC market was young and highly dynamic. Now that the market has matured considerably, it's a maladaptive strategy that traps them into a continually playing catch-up.

    I'm sure MSFT will remain a cash machine for years, but unless they get some serious inventive culture working, they'll be vulnerable to continual erosion of their business base.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 5:23 PM, blefuscu wrote:

    Analysts keep talking about Google's apps moving into the MS space, but I'm not sure if they have considered it or asked how companies actually feel about migrating to that competitor.

    In my Fortune 10 (is that even a proper term?) company, we do not allow any of G's products nor open source code. It all comes down to liability, and with open source ultimately there's no one accountable -- financially at least. We've tried to push G's products but they refuse to allow the standard indemnification clauses that other software vendors agree to, which essentially turns their software into open source in the eyes of the legal dept so they never allow it.

    So until lawyers change their perspective (unlikely) or Google actually practices their "do no evil" mantra in backing up their products (even more unlikely given their current financial/brand clout), I don't see G penetrating into the real corporate IT space anytime in the near to mid term.

    To reiterate, I'm not a fan of Mr. Softy's products at all, but ultimately the lawyers -- they're the ones really running the major corporations -- will only agree to traditional business partners.

    Maybe a generation later when all the kids reared on G's cloud computing products have entered middle/senior management will we see a significant shift in the business world.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Henry3Dogg wrote:

    Yes!

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 6:27 PM, jmullina wrote:

    Wow - no offense, but i don't think these comments show a grasp of what has made Microsoft a successful company in the past... nor what will make it a successful company in the future, IMHO.

    I expect Microsoft's historical business model (help people great apps for OS --> customers by OS to get apps --> ubiquity of OS drives additional apps --> Repeat) will continue to be profitable for a while. The secondary source of income --Office -- which helps drive OS ubiquity will also continue for a while. Additionally, these will be supplemented by a new business model based on cloud computing. This will grow revenue and net income, as Microsoft provides a greater contribution to the total value chain, but may dilute operating margins.

    Search share is up nearly 50% since Bing launched, and continuing organic gains should continue for a while -- helped by the yahoo deal, as increased search volume drives increased search performance and cusotmer adoption in it's own virtuous circle.

    Finally, Microsoft will leverage it's traditional App Development ->App adoption ->OS adoption model in new spaces. Yes, the phone competition will be fierce, and phones are very important. But it's not just phones... computers are literally all around us, and increasingly so every day. Cars, TVs (xbox is not just about games :) ), media, signage, picture frames, robots, industrial equipment, vending machines, etc, etc. Microsoft wants to help people make all these different things work together in compelling new ways, and offers a broad proposition for that way beyond what anyone else can offer.

    I'm optimistic the company will do well... although not the most visible, the company has very innovative technologies that lead multiple categories... and perhaps more importantly, they've demonstrated in the past they have the "culture" to change with industry transitions (e.g., PC to client-server, client-server to web, and web to services).

    Of course, this is all about fundamentals. And if ever there was a company who's stock price defied fundamentals, it's Microsoft. It's a company that everyone things they understand, though it seems few actually do. My impression is the stock is driven more by consumer perceptions of industry leadership and relevance than by anything else. That said, shareholders should be going to buy Windows Phone 7 when it launches (even if they don't need a phone), because the perception of that product's performance will likely have a far bigger impact on stock value than the product's underlying financial contributions would suggest.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 6:56 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    Microsoft is a hot product in a hot market (OS) and Rim is a cold product in a cold market (cellphones with email and messaging features). So why is Microsoft not experiencing factorial growths like Apple firing on all cylinders, and Google gaining popularity in Android? Microsoft is receding together with Rim both lingering in 10x earnings valuation.

    Fact is Microsoft is doing extremely well selling its Windows to the OS community, and Apple/Android are doing extremely well selling to the User community, and Rim is still selling to the Keyboard community (check it out, the BB people are really in love only with Mr. Lazaridis's keyboard, just like little kids who cling to their towels).

    Windows Server are selling very very well because it resides in the OS layer. Windows Desktop is losing relevance because it resides in the User layer. Google is also at the User layer but it is a bolt-on to an OS which increasingly is going to be the Chrome OS. Rim is an email app at the User layer running on the Rim OS which is not really a OS but more a runtime environment like Java.

    In older days when the user community was really small the users tie the User layer together with the OS layer. Users were experts on OS level commands and scripts necessary for using and maintaining the machines, but now the users are a whole lot less expert and thus the OS has to be transparent and maintenance-free. Apple had seen this trend 32 years ago and its Mac platform has always been at the User layer, thus users of Mac and now iOS have no needs to look elsewhere. The same cannot be said for Microsoft. The Windows Desktop OS has too many OS layer elements in its user interface to be desirable to the exploding number of users. Rim's situation is much much worse than Microsoft's and thus the Blackberrys are quickly fading into obscurity. Blackberrys are notoriously suffocating in user interface, very hard to learn and master, and the Blackberrys are really quite inferior in comparison to the Windows running on notebooks or PCs.

    Microsoft as a desktop OS must remove all traces of user interfaces making the Microsoft OS completely transparent to the user. A totally brand new Microsoft User environment is needed, one that is totally encapsulated by real world user identifiable objects such as streets and buildings, rooms, books, receipts, bills, money, bank tellers, teachers, coworkers, etc. The Microsoft OS layer must disappear from the user views and controls. Only then can Microsoft get a chance to become relevant again, the problem with the Windows Desktop OS is that the Desktop is not an OS and the OS is not a Desktop. In making that perfectly clear to the customers Microsoft would become much friendlier and approachable to the users, and sell a lot more.

    On the other hand, Rim has the opposite problem to Microsoft as a Desktop OS. Rim is just email. Blackberrys are just BBM machines. Rim cannot grow beyond that, and even if it does grow beyond email and BBM, customers have much better superior choices in iPhone and Android. This is the reason why Rim is getting out of the Blackberry business and into the application store business, and the network services business. Unfortunately, there is no money nor business in application store or network services as evidenced by Nokia shutting down its Ovi store and the Siemens network services.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 7:21 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    Bottom line is for Microsoft to make things super useful and easy to use. The obstacle is that a desktop is not that useful and easy to use anymore because the user base has broadened significantly. As a result a new lower common denominator has to be found and used as a metaphor instead of a desktop or a phonetop. The old Xerox Altos desktop metaphor no longer suffice, perhaps the GPS metaphor with a lot more detail objects can serve as a better user interface? Any clues?

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 7:44 PM, lutece7 wrote:

    two questions about the table

    1. what does TTM mean?

    2. why don't the two columns add up to 100%?

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 8:06 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    TTM is a stock resource company specializing in business performances in segment profits and revenues. The calculations are quite tedious. The higher the number the better.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2010, at 8:14 PM, TMFOrangeblood wrote:

    lutuce7, TTM is trailing 12 months (adds the last four reported quarters together). The columns don't add up to 100% because only some of the segments are shown. Microsoft has shuffled some things around and dropped a segment over the last four quarters, so it was simpler to just show the pertinent, major segments.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2010, at 6:05 PM, SmarterThanYou1 wrote:

    This article holds true to the site. Microsoft zune revolutionized the mp3/4 community. Built in FM radio, wireless sync, buy from FM, and how can you forget an awesome sideways for video screen. Apple just has the idiot population in its control. people who know that they can't afford apple product say ooh shiny and jump at the chance to get the newest shiny easily broken objecct. I dropped my 30g zune on concrete and it slid 5 feet. Not a scratch. Ipod also charges way to much for their products. And now they rip off the sideways screen and now the wireless sync.fools indeed for apple.

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2010, at 9:45 PM, zymok wrote:

    SmarterThanYou1, had the Zune been introduced with all the features you list contemporaneously with the iPod, it likely would have been hailed as a breakthrough product and Bill Gates would be wearing cool black t-shirts with jeans and Steve Jobs would be wearing nebbish suits. As actually happened, MSFT gave AAPL a five-year head start, by which time the iPod with iTunes had given AAPL a strongly entrenched user base - far too entrenched to be coaxed away by incremental improvements like WiFi connectivity. In short, the Zune is another example of MSFT being late to market with a me-too product.

  • Report this Comment On July 11, 2010, at 2:39 PM, plange01 wrote:

    microsoft has its act together its balme who is clueless but then everyone knows it already.....

  • Report this Comment On July 11, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Milligram46 wrote:

    GOOG inroads with Google Apps is highly overstated by most analysts. The only major victory GOOG can point to is LA County. Marketshare sits below 4% and most of the "wins" GOOG likes to tout are small POC deployments - they don't discuss how many of them have actually been shut down.

    MSFT foray into online versions of Office and other apps is darn interesting and makes it a bit harder for GOOG to compete and remember, GOOG apps for the enterprise are not free, and are not advertiser supported, they are licensed and one area where GOOG falls way short is in support of their products for end users.

    With that said, Kin - ugh.

  • Report this Comment On July 11, 2010, at 6:58 PM, oldfool37 wrote:

    Microsoft? < yawn >

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2010, at 4:39 AM, jesterboomer wrote:

    After VISTA and Office 2007, IMO Microsoft needs to pay more attention to making its core end users happier. Unless Office 2010 corrects the horrible interface changes in Office 2007, there is some risk that over the next few years Office could start to lose significant market share to Open Office, which has the advantage of being free. Outlook could lose share to Google web mail. Ultimately Windows risks losing share to a Unix variant from an entity with credible support, e.g. Google.

    The risks of a sudden demise are not high - more likely slower growth. But, Microsoft products have been underwhelming for the past several years. Microsoft needs to watch out and investors need to watch out as well. A decline sometime in the next few years is not impossible.

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2010, at 1:25 PM, InfoThatHelp wrote:

    Microsoft as OS has to remove all OS elements from its Desktop and encapsulate them into the Server. Microsoft can be much more effective as a 3-tier platform - User tier, Server tier, and Data tier. Server tier will be the workhorse in charge of all the controller logic and states, Sqlserver for persistence data tier. User tier can now be open to all things that relate with humans and external systems. The Server tier can be a hosted service by Microsoft facilitating any TCO issues and also greatly enhance the stability and availability of OS services.

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2010, at 8:41 PM, sobay5some wrote:

    When a company has so much cash and yet cannot get investors their money's worth, it has to be top management and the board. They are not doing their job --- no accountability, no solutions, no ideas. First class company but 3rd class management. With so many execution errors and mistakes, Microsoft continues to look like a me too company, and a poor job at that.

    HP is a great example of doing things right by acknowledging there is a problem and then fire the CEO and get a better one. Its about time for S. Balmer to go, voluntarily or otherwise.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1229615, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 12:16:03 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
T $33.69 Up +0.05 +0.15%
AT&T CAPS Rating: ***
VZ $41.45 Up +0.06 +0.14%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
RIMM $11.00 Up +0.29 +2.71%
Research In Motion… CAPS Rating: *
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement