Recs

6

The 1 Thing to Know About Linn Energy

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

I know it sounds ludicrous, but investors often overlook the people in charge of protecting their investments. The idea of gauging a company's leadership plays second-fiddle other categories of analysis. However, at Fool.com, we believe careful study of effective leadership is one of the most important areas of evaluating long-term winning investments.

We like CEOs who actually work for shareholders like us. After all, we're the true owners of the business. When you're deciding whether to invest in a company, failing to vet its CEO is a big mistake. In fact, if you've overlooked the study of a company's leadership, then that's the one important area you should know about before finalizing your investment in the company.

After reviewing thousands of companies over dozens of years, we've found several crucial characteristics of quality management. Today, we'll size up the recent performance of Linn Energy's (Nasdaq: LINE  ) leadership.

How much skin do they have in the game?
Are Linn Energy CEO Mark Ellis's interests aligned with shareholders? Here's how the Linn Energy CEO's ownership compares to that of a group of peers across the energy industry.

CEO, Company

Shares Owned

% of Shares Outstanding

Insider Ownership Market Value (in millions)

Mark Ellis, Linn Energy

562,953

0.38%

$17

Floyd Wilson, Petrohawk Energy

3,191,521

1.06%

$52

H. Clark, Forest Oil

374,186

0.33%

$11

Douglas Miller, EXCO Resources

4,566,831

2.15%

$68

Miles Allison, Comstock Resources

1,501,004

3.17%

$34

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Mark Ellis actually owns $17 million worth of Linn Energy, or 0.38% of shares outstanding. We Fools prefer CEOs who have higher ownership stakes in their businesses, since that better aligns their interests with shareholders'. However, while we think high insider ownership is a good sign, low insider ownership isn't necessarily a bad one. CEOs may be relatively new, or may have a low percent of shares outstanding, but a high total value of ownership.

How well are they using your money?
Return on equity can help investors determine how adeptly management gets the job done. This metric combines how well management is expanding profitability, managing assets, and using financial leverage, all in one ratio. While return on equity isn't foolproof -- managers can manipulate it with excessive leverage, for example -- it does an excellent job of suggesting how effective managers are, and how well they can generate high returns on investors' capital.

Here's a look at Linn Energy's recent return on equity:

anImage

Linn Energy's current return on equity falls below its five-year average. While recent economic conditions have been challenging, declining return on equity shows either that management hasn't been able to control costs and manage assets, or that it's failed to move into higher-return businesses over the last five years.

How productive are their workers?
Revenue per employee provides another way to gauge a CEO's effectiveness. If this metric is declining, the company might have a bloated organizational structure, or too many extra employees toiling away at new initiatives that just aren't working out. Either possibility would hint that management isn't effectively running the organization.

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

As you can see, Linn Energy's revenue per employee has moved above its five-year average. Rising revenue per employee can suggest that management's getting better at controlling costs, or encouraging more productivity from its workers. To better see whether Linn Energy's management is excelling in this area, let's compare the company to its peer group once again:

Company

2005

2007

2009

Last Year's Revenue Per Employee vs. 5-Year Average

Linn Energy, LLC

$382

$515

$754

15%

Petrohawk Energy (NYSE: HK  )

$1,676

$3,372

$2,310

(5%)

Forest Oil (NYSE: FST  )

$2,119

$1,488

$1,089

(33%)

EXCO Resources (NYSE: XCO  )

$646

$1,298

$730

(29%)

Comstock Resources (NYSE: CRK  )

$3,408

$2,403

$2,237

(21%)

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar figures in thousands.

Linn Energy's revenue per employee isn't just rising -- it's better than its combined peer group. That's quite an impressive feat.

These are just a few of the factors we look for in a company's management. If you can find leaders who continually give shareholders high returns on their capital, and align their interests with yours, you've got a better chance to enjoy market-beating returns for the long haul.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Jeremy Phillips does not own shares of the companies mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 18, 2010, at 9:51 PM, Gonzhouse wrote:

    I bought my first block of LINN in Dec 08 at $12.63 and have added regularly since then. The risk with LINN is their hedging and that's a valid point. But these guys know what they are doing and are successful. When oil and gas spike in the next several years, I'll wish I had bought nothing but LINN.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2010, at 10:48 AM, JNaughton wrote:

    Mr. Phillips,

    I'm missing something on your Revenue per Employee analysis. Although it increased year over year I don't understand your conclusion that theirs is "better than its combined peer group" when it's only marginally better than XCO, 25% below FST, and is less than one third (!) of HK and CRK's revenue per employee. Am I reading something backwards?

    I've had LINE for a fewe years and have a very nice gain, but based on your data -- lower CEO ownership, below average ROE, and revenues per employee that appear to be a fraction of its peers, it seems like it may be a good time to move somewhere else in this sector.

    Regards,

    Jerry N

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2010, at 3:18 PM, dgwright352 wrote:

    I want to be respectful in the way I address this, but an article like this makes me stop and rethink the value of my subscription fees.

    First, to say Mr. Ellis's 0.38% ownership is low compared to your preferred level of ownership or to a peer group doesn't look at the big picture. Mr. Ellis's ownership will pay him approximately $1.4 million in cash distributions annually and given the nature of their business (oil and gas exploration and production) and corporate structure (master limited partnership) most of it will be shielded from taxes. I would say that he is totally aligned with shareholders interest of growing distributions and capital appreciation..

    Second, ratios for financial analysis have their place in evaluating investments, but you must use the appropriate ratios to give you a true picture. Revenue per employee in a commodity based energy business is fairly useless. There are too many factors - i.e. a market-driven commodity priced revenue stream, being an operator or holding non-operating interest, the product mix of crude oil, NGLs, and natural gas, hedging strategies, etc.- that will distort the comparison. Textbook ratio analysis can be helpful, but it can also be misleading if you don't understand the underlying business fundamentals.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, bricks79 wrote:

    dqwright352 has it right. This article is written by someone whom is using broad textbook financial parameters that do not focus on the precise measurements invoved in energy MLP's. Yahoo doesn't list the credentials of its writers and I have seen a number of articles that are very superficial. I invest in six MLP's, including Linn, and this article misses the boat. Linn is currently fully priced, but still a very well run company. If you don't understand the business, don't write about it!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1274346, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 2:09:29 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 4 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
LINE $36.03 Up +0.01 +0.03%
Linn Energy, LLC CAPS Rating: *****
XCO $7.92 Down -0.03 -0.38%
EXCO Resources, In… CAPS Rating: ***
HK.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Petrohawk Energy C… CAPS Rating: ****
CRK $14.98 Up +0.35 +2.39%
Comstock Resources… CAPS Rating: ***
FST $8.43 Up +0.22 +2.68%
Forest Oil Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement