A Securities & Exchange Commission vote has made it official: Shareholders now have the right to voice their opinions on CEO pay through votes held at least once every three years.
This isn't too surprising. The recently passed Dodd-Frank Act already required public companies to give shareholders a non-binding vote on CEO pay packages, bonuses, and golden parachutes. This single significant shift in the way public companies do business may help drive big changes in overall corporate governance.
Press and pressure
Passive or apathetic investors, take vote: Now your votes have actually begun to mean something. More so than ever, shareholders can truly feel like they're part owners of public companies.
That makes now the perfect time for a push for better corporate governance policies. As it turns out, large institutional shareholders are striking while the iron's hot this year.
This week, the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), which is affiliated with the AFL-CIO, announced that it's filing 27 shareholder proposals at public companies "to foster greater transparency concerning risk, director accountability, and independent board leadership."
AFSCME is gunning for quite a few corporate governance-oriented changes this year. Let's take a look at a few of them.
AFSCME has filed proposals calling for declassified boards at Alcoa
AFSCME is also calling for independent chairs at Anadarko Petroleum
Corporate lobbying is a bigger concern to more people than ever, particularly after the Supreme Court's verdict in the Citizens United case. AFSCME is asking companies like Citigroup and Lockheed Martin
Some tax actions can eventually hurt shareholder returns, or increase a company's odds of restating its finances. Thus, AFSCME is also asking for boards' risk assessments on tax policies at a group of six companies, including retail heavyweights Amazon.com
There's bound to be plenty more shareholder proposals hitting our collective radars as proxy season heats up. Thanks to the changes resulting from Dodd-Frank, a newly emboldened throng of shareholders seems to have kicked off a transparency trend.
Moving beyond say on pay
While shareholder proposals like the ones cited above have always found their ways into the back pages of corporate proxy statements, new attention to shareholder rights -- and greater public awareness of the dangers of unchecked managers and ineffectual boards -- may help strong corporate governance changes make greater headway than they have in the past.
Whether or not you agree with such proposals, as a shareholder, it's your right to vote as you see fit. There's no time like the present to cast more meaningful ballots, whether on say on pay or a host of other issues.
Check back at Fool.com every Wednesday and Friday for Alyce Lomax's columns on corporate governance.