Recs

12

Why the Street Should Love Sirius XM Radio's Earnings

Although business headlines still tout earnings numbers, many investors have moved past net earnings as a measurement of a company's economic output. That's because earnings are very often less trustworthy than cash flow, since earnings are more open to manipulation based on dubious judgment calls.

Earnings' unreliability is one of the reasons Foolish investors often flip straight past the income statement to check the cash-flow statement. In general, by taking a close look at the cash moving in and out of the business, you can better understand whether the last batch of earnings brought money into the company or merely disguised a cash gusher with a pretty headline.

Calling all cash flows
When you're trying to buy the market's best stocks, it's worth checking up on your companies' free cash flow (FCF) once a quarter or so, to see whether it bears any relationship to the net income in the headlines. That brings us to Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) , whose recent revenue and earnings are plotted below.

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. FCF = free cash flow. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Over the past 12 months, Sirius XM generated $320.8 million cash while it booked net income of $79.6 million. That means it turned 11.2% of its revenue into FCF. Sounds pretty impressive. But since a single-company snapshot doesn't offer much context, it always pays to compare that figure with those of sector and industry peers and competitors, to see how your company stacks up.

Company

TTM Revenue

TTM FCF

TTM FCF Margin

Sirius XM Radio $2,877 $321 11.2%
Saga Communications (AMEX: SGA  ) $128 $23 18.1%
Cumulus Media (Nasdaq: CMLS  ) $263 $40 15.3%
CBS (NYSE: CBS  ) $14,060 $1,451 10.3%

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. FCF = free cash flow. TTM = trailing 12 months.

All cash is not equal
Unfortunately, the cash-flow statement isn't immune from nonsense, either. That's why it pays to take a close look at the components of cash flow from operations, to make sure that the cash flows are of high quality. What does that mean? To me, it means they need to be real and replicable in the upcoming quarters, rather than being offset by continual cash outflows that don't appear on the income statement, such as major capital expenditures.

For instance, cash flow based on cash net income and adjustments for non-cash income-statement expenses, like depreciation, is generally favorable. An increase in cash flow based on stiffing your suppliers (by increasing accounts payable for the short term) or shortchanging Uncle Sam on taxes will come back to bite investors later. The same goes for decreasing accounts receivable; it's good to see, but it's ordinary in recessionary times, and you can increase collections only so much. Finally, adding stock-based compensation expenses back to cash flows is questionable when a company hands out a lot of equity to employees and uses cash in later periods to buy back those shares.

So how does the cash flow at Sirius XM look? Take a peek at the following chart, which flags questionable cash-flow sources with a red bar.

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. Dollar values in millions. TTM = trailing 12 months.

When I say "questionable cash-flow sources," I mean items such as changes in taxes payable, tax benefits from stock options, and asset sales, among others. That's not to say that companies booking these as sources of cash flow are weak, or are engaging in any sort of wrongdoing, or that everything that comes up questionable in my graph is automatically bad news. But whenever a company is getting more than, say, 10% of its cash from operations from these dubious sources, investors ought to make sure to refer to the filings and dig in.

With 13.6% of Sirius XM's operating cash flow coming from questionable sources, investors should take a closer look at the underlying numbers. Within the questionable cash-flow figure plotted in the TTM period above, stock-based compensation and related tax benefits provided the biggest boost, at 9.9% of cash flow from operations. Overall, the biggest drag on FCF came from capital expenditures, which consumed 43.6% of cash from operations.

A Foolish final thought
Most investors don't keep tabs on their companies' cash flow. I think that's a mistake. If you take the time to read past the headlines and crack a filing now and then, you're in a much better position to spot potential trouble early. Better yet, you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home-run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

We can help you keep tabs on your companies with My Watchlist, our free, personalized stock-tracking service.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings. He is a co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 07, 2011, at 3:42 PM, mountain8 wrote:

    I have tried, but I'm sorry, I cannot understand your graphs. For instance, I read, on your last graph, in 2008, SIRI lost somewhere between $0 and $5+ billion net income. They also gained about the same amounts in questionable cash inflow. That doesn't make any sense to me.

    I am not up on new visual charts, but I like your articles as I'm trying to learn more about cash flow. Is there somewhere you have left directions on how to read your graphs? Thanks

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 6:25 AM, zukerman wrote:

    When attempting to understand these charts, first consider that the fool has been advising all to stay clear of Sirius. Adding stock based compensation back into cash flows, really? You remember what you were told when you were young, never lie because you'll have to tell another to cover that one. Maybe this is why Motley should stick to what they know best, old tired stodgy stocks for the fixed income crowd. Motley has never had a rating above two stars out of a possible 5. If and I do mean [if] anyone followed their advice about this company they are truly questioning why. This is but another article to try to justify their position when it comes to Sirius. This is not true analysis in any sense of the word, but merely an attempt to quiet those that clearly question Motley's intentions. You weren't supposed to understand this graph, anyone with a basic understanding of power point can see that it is but an exaggeration of the numbers that got out of control in the past. Anyone can look at an income statement and see fantastic improvements with this company, instead this rag produces some silly chart with lots of different red tones to try to scare investors into believing we have one foot in the grave. One of these charts was created before earnings and has been seen before, what does that tell you? I can pay off my house with cash anytime I want with my earnings. I'm not bragging, merely letting Motley followers what could have been. As always, shame on you Motley.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 7:18 AM, David369 wrote:

    Maybe if I had a degree in accounting... Buy low, sell high. Use common sense and pick companies that you see having future value to the masses and recent history shows an uptrend. Seems to work pretty good most of the time. But I do like the pretty colors in the charts.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 12:36 PM, mountain8 wrote:

    Dear Mr Zukerman,

    From my absolute low point in 2009, my portfolio has increased 260%, almost entirely on TMF recommendations-. Of course any recommendation from anyone requires due dilegence on my own before investing. I don't buy into all their recommendations. I just use them as a starting point as I would with any service.

    Oh, incidently, SIRI is up 167% since I bought at $ .87.

    Also, I have already paid off my house, two cars and all my other debts save my operational credit card I pay off every month.

    These ARE brags, letting you know what could have been for you. Shame on you Mr. Zukerman.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 12:38 PM, mountain8 wrote:

    PS. I still need help interpreting these graphs,

    Powerpoint or not.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 12:46 PM, mountain8 wrote:

    I'm sorry, correction: my portfolio is only up 160%. Stupid error. My bad (whatever that means). However, my Netflix is up 1300+% (smiley face). I bought at $16.11. Don't that break your heart.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Rut67 wrote:

    There is no such thing as "Questionnable Cash-flow sources", it's either positive ot negative cash flow no matter its source. This is a rather stupid take on siriusXM and you should be embarrassed.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 7:31 PM, zukerman wrote:

    mountain, stepped away for awhile and missed your thread. First sentence says it all, and was directed at Motley only. I don't make a habit of attacking strangers on a message board unless they print something bogus like most Motley articles. Congrats on your Netflix and Sirius buys. I can't recall a positive article about Sirius in a long time, correct me if I'm wrong. The fact is, I've been in Sirius since 2004 and have made a nice profit already. Don't let Motley talk you into giving away your shares. I agree with you when it comes to research, if you buy wrong it's nobody's fault but your own..

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 7:53 PM, cbryant1990 wrote:

    Let me see if I get this right. SIRI at $2.23. PE at 222. Cash on hand dropping from $586M to $433M for the latest period. With 3.95B shares outstanding, thats 0.0109 cents per share. If you think my figures are off check the latest filing. Total assets $7.2B. Total liabilities $6.9B. Did I mention the market cap of $8.6B and quarterly revenue of $78M. Whats wrong with this picture? I am so shorting this stock at $2.23. I bought it at $0.39 and sold it at $0.78. It made sense then, but it's insane now. What company has a PE of 222? I don't get it now. Somebody enlighten mewith real numbers.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 9:13 PM, zukerman wrote:

    bryant, are you bitter because you missed the run from .78-2.24? The numbers looked even worse then, but you claim to have doubled your money. Maybe you shorted it after your double? Think of all the money you could have made had you not gotten too smart for your own good. Go ahead and short it if you want, I'll be waiting for this big drop you talk of to increase my position again. I'll bet you could make cab fare writing for Motley, you fit right into that fold quite well. Cheer up life is too short. Long SiriusXM.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2011, at 11:49 PM, rfcoz wrote:

    Seth.. was the title supposed to be "Why Should the Street love SIrius XM Radio's Earnings" ??? or was this another MF come-on. Did

    I fail to read between the lines?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1490775, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 9:41:09 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 12 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:02 PM
SGA $34.47 Down -0.27 -0.78%
Saga Communication… CAPS Rating: **
SIRI $1.93 Down -0.06 -3.02%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
CBS $31.56 Down -0.07 -0.22%
CBS Corp CAPS Rating: ***
CMLS $2.83 Up +0.02 +0.71%
Cumulus Media, Inc… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement