Recs

1

How to Tell If Alcoa Hiding Is Hiding Weakness

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Alcoa (NYSE: AA  ) carries $5.3 billion of goodwill and other intangibles on its balance sheet. Sometimes goodwill, especially when it's excessive, can foreshadow problems down the road. Could this be the case with Alcoa?

Before we answer that, let's look at what could go wrong.

AOL blows up
In early 2002, AOL Time Warner was trading for $66.27 per share. It had $209 billion of assets on its balance sheet, and $128 billion of that was in the form of goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill is simply the difference between the price paid for a company during an acquisition and the net assets of the acquired company. The $128 billion of goodwill in this case was created when AOL and Time Warner merged in 2000.

The problem with inflating your net assets with goodwill is that it can -- being intangible, after all -- go away if the acquisition or merger doesn't create the amount of value that was expected. That's what happened in AOL Time Warner's case. It had to write off most of the goodwill over the next few months, and one year later that line item had shrunk to $37 billion. Investors punished the stock along the way, sending it down to $27.04 -- or nearly a 60% loss.

In his fine book It's Earnings That Count, Hewitt Heiserman explains the AOL situation and how two simple metrics can help minimize your risk of owning a company that may blow up like this. Let's see how Alcoa holds up using his two metrics.

Intangible assets ratio
This ratio shows us the percentage of total assets made up by goodwill and other intangibles. Heiserman says he views anything over 20% as worrisome, "because management might be overpaying for the acquisition or acquisitions that gave rise to the goodwill."

Alcoa has an intangible assets ratio of 13%.

This is well below Heiserman's threshold, and a sign that any growth you see with the company is probably organic. But we're not through; let's also take a look at tangible book value.

Tangible book value
Tangible book value is simply what remains after subtracting goodwill and other intangibles from shareholders' equity (also known as book value). If this is not a positive value, Heiserman advises you to run away because such companies may "lack the balance sheet muscle to protect themselves in a recession or from better-financed competitors."

Alcoa's tangible book value is $10.3 billion, so no yellow flags here.

By the way, I asked Heiserman about the tendency for some large-cap blue chips -- names like Procter & Gamble, IBM, and Altria -- to have a high intangible assets ratio and negative tangible book value. He says this can be OK, provided the company has (1) modest or no net debt, (2) persistent and rising levels of free cash flow, and (3) stock buybacks at a discount to intrinsic value.

Foolish bottom line
To recap, here are Alcoa's numbers, as well as a bonus look at a few other companies in its industry.

Company

Intangible Assets Ratio

Tangible Book Value (Millions)

Alcoa 13% $10,268
Alumina (NYSE: AWC  ) 0% $3,230
Century Aluminum (Nasdaq: CENX  ) 0% $1,178
Kaiser Aluminum (Nasdaq: KALU  ) 5% $885

Data provided by Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Alcoa appears to be in good shape in terms of the intangible assets ratio and tangible book value. You can never base an entire investment thesis on one or two metrics, but there are no yellow flags here. If any companies you're researching do fail one of these checks, make sure you understand the business model and management's objectives. I'll help you keep a close eye on these ratios over the next few quarters by updating them soon after each earnings report.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool analyst Rex Moore owns shares of Procter & Gamble but of no other companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Altria Group and IBM. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Procter & Gamble. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 4:27 PM, Brettze wrote:

    What??? ALCOA is making no effort to hide anything weak , they are so obvious to everybody!!! ALCOA is eagerly giving away aluminium at $1 a pound and you can find plenty at Overstock.com, Family Dollar Stores, Secret Goldman Sachs Warehouses, etc...

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 4:29 PM, Brettze wrote:

    China is not even buying ALCOA aluminium at all... Sure, ALCOA is signing MOUs with China and I still have yet to see nothing coming out for ALCOA in China... China got to shut down most of its aging aluminium operations... What weakness ???????? Try looking at the aluminium prices through your rear view mirror, st upid!

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 4:31 PM, Brettze wrote:

    ALCOA is making no efforts to get alumninium prices up at all... All ALCOA ever does is manage, managae, manage, manage with nothing to show for it.... while the other metal companies just coast ahead with rising copper prices, moly, nickel, gold, silver, zinc, lead, mudpies....

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Brettze wrote:

    Rio Tinto OVERPAID for ALCAN at $40 billon and Rio Tinto used obscene profits coming from iron mining and coal to help cover the real steep losses on its acquistion of ALCAN ... ALCOA offered $26 billon to buy ALCAN but Rio Tinto beat ALCOA not by a few billons but $14 billon !!!! Everything is so stacked against aluminium and ALCOA can do nothing about it , can ALCOA??? It seems to me like it would be heresy to contemplate raising aluminium prices at all... We probably would want to break ALCOA up when aluminium prices hit $2 a pound... calling it obscene profits while Freeport is cashing in profits at $4 copper .... Strange, strange strange!!! bizarree!!

    Weakness ?????? what ?????? wherer/???? i see nothing weak about Alcoa ... ALCOA is all tied up by industrial heavyweights fixing aluminium prices around the world... Europe get in deep debt because Europe can use higher aluminium prices to tidy over its aluminium operations... Europe is losing money on aluminium smelters and they are still refuing to shut them down ... Why??? jobs... but $1 aluminium can not pay workers ... impossible!! slave labor at China yeah... China produce one half of the worlld's annual aluminium output.... and coal produceres are eagelry helping China keep it that way....

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Brettze wrote:

    The real weakness is that we still cant curb coal consumpiton around the world.... We keep burning coal while aluminnium inventories continue to build up at secret Goldman Sachs warehouses.. Why??? what weakness are you talking about??? all dirty dealings .... to keep aluminim prices down while ignoring oil prices ... Whyu???

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Brettze wrote:

    Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Brettze wrote:

    ALCOA , Century Aluminium and others are circling Iceland for future new smelter construction and expansion while there is still no energy source to be built like hyfropower .. All is talk.... Enviormentalists are up in arms against the proposed new smetlters along with huge new dams that has yet to be built and flooding the scenic Iceland highlands.. What enviormentalists might ignore is that China is producing well close to half of the world's aluminium annually with coal power.... China is probably anxious to shut down as much aging smelting capacity to help reduce global warming issues.... China probably is planning to start importing aluminium during the meanwhile. If Iceland projects is repelaed then Chinia will probably decide to reverse its plans and keep its aging smelters ... and keep burning coal .... It is a hard choice to make... Actually , we dont really need Iceland to build new smelters because we can use aluminium to make heliostats (mirrors) that can be used to concentrate sunlight toward solar towers to generate electricity for making more new aluminium.. This is what sustainability really mean all along... Why we havent really gone ahead with solar tower technology that can be constructed in hot deserts ... Aluminium smelters are very sweaty to work in and to put smelters in hot deserts is something to pause about... Maybe put smelters in cooler locations close to hot deserts but powerlines are very expensive.... Aluminium companies cannot do everything by themselves expecaily at depressed aluminium prices of only $1 a pound... Other metal prices had gone up a lot except aluminium because we are running away from alumiinium with enviornmentalists in tow... We need vast more aluminium to put in automobiles to help cut down weight and boost fuel efficiency.. We also need aluminium for public transporation... Recycling aluminium will not be able to supply enough to satisfy the demands going forward... If enviormentalists are really serious about stopping Iceland projects which is really fine with me as an ALCOA shareholder only if enviromentalists are willing to go the extra mile for ALCOA shareholders ... Please hlelp me as an innocnet bystander .... ALCOA can fail anytime soon... ALCOA CANNOT SURVIVE MUCH LONGER AT $1 A POUND.. Please be fair to me...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1541701, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 6:30:55 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 21 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 3:59 PM
CENX $7.10 Up +0.04 +0.57%
Century Aluminum C… CAPS Rating: ***
KALU $49.46 Down -0.41 -0.82%
Kaiser Aluminum Co… CAPS Rating: *****
AA $8.63 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Alcoa, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
AWC $3.45 Down -0.03 -0.86%
Alumina Limited (A… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement