News outlets in Washington, D.C., reported that about halfway through LivingSocial's two-day deal on Zipcar
Join the club
Wholesale giant Costco
Total Net Income
|2010||$1.3 billion||$1.7 billion|
|2009||$1.1 billion||$1.5 billion|
Source: Company annual report.
The numbers don't lie. Costco keeps razor-thin margins on the goods it sells, relying on products' low cost to entice customers into buying annual memberships.
Zipcar, however, is no Costco. Right now, Zipcar only generates 12% of its revenue from membership fees; the other 88% comes from car use. Discount deals like LivingSocial's will not do much to drive that number higher in the short term, but if the company can control costs and limit churn year-over-year, that number should grow. In the meantime, the company must encourage all its new Zipsters (hip slang for members) to make use of their memberships.
Though Zipcar is the dominant player in the car-sharing business, owning 50% of the market share in North America right now, competition is growing from traditional car rental companies like Hertz
D.C. is one of Zipcar's four major markets (New York, Chicago, and San Francisco are the others), and competition issues here can highlight challenges the company might face on a greater scale nationwide.
Take, for example, parking spots. Zipcar used to be able to rent premium spots from the District for $200 annually. Those days are over; those premium spots now command as much as $3,600 a year. As a result, Zipcar's number of curbside parking spots dropped this summer from 84 in the District to 12. Who was among the other companies interested in bidding for the same spots? You guessed it, Hertz.
If Zipcar wants to continue to dominate, it has to snatch up as much of the market share as possible, as soon as possible. Though it may take an initial hit on its bottom line with this LivingSocial deal, it now has more than 3,000 customers who will probably not sign up with Hertz or a similar competitor in the next year.