Recs

5

It's More Than Just Luck for the 1%

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

My colleague Alex Planes makes the argument that the 1% may have been lucky on their rise to the top, becoming successful because they did something first that nobody else had done. I agree in principle with this sentiment, but it's also my belief that hard work and determination can still lead to successful endeavors for anyone, not just the members of the Occupy movement.

Many of the richest people in the U.S. started from challenging circumstances to reach the height of the American dream. Many did, in fact, win the "birth lottery," being born into affluence. Warren Buffett, the "Oracle of Omaha," points out that he was designed for the American system and feels lucky to be born into it. Buffett had a leg up on most of America, being the son of a prominent congressman and investor who may have helped garner investors for his early investment partnerships, but by most accounts, Buffett is successful because he didn't rest on his family's laurels and actually sought to make a life for himself.

The 0.00013%
The Forbes 400 list is a mixed bag of names, including people who simply inherited their wealth. The people on this exclusive list have an average net worth of $3.8 billion, with a total net worth of $1.5 trillion. A lot of this net worth is held in stock of the companies founded and run by the people in the list, but some is also held in houses, art, private planes, and other such trappings of wealth. Each person on the list has a story behind his or her wealth, and it's surprising how much hard work paid off for some of the people on the list.

Thanks, Big Blue!
Larry Ellison, third on the Forbes list and founder of Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) , came from humble beginnings. He was born to an unwed mother in New York and was adopted by his aunt and uncle when his mother decided she couldn't take care of him after an early bout with pneumonia. His adopted father, an accountant by trade, continually told Larry as a young boy that he was "good for nothing." He dropped out of two Illinois colleges and headed west to work for technology companies, eventually settling on the idea for a database company later named for its first product. When another large technology company, IBM, decided to pass on the development of large databases, Ellison stepped in, and the rest is computing history. Since going public in March 1986, Oracle has returned an annualized 22.4%.

Making money in a conventional way
Sheldon Adelson is another example of finding opportunity and turning it into wealth. Before gaining wealth as owner of Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) , Adelson started a business selling toiletry kits to motels, was a mortgage broker, and started a charter-tours business. It wasn't until he founded COMDEX, a premier computer-trade show in 1979, that he made his fortune. He determined that he would be able to rent convention space from hotels in Las Vegas for 25 cents a square foot and lease the space to computer and technology venders for $25 or more. The timing was perfect, as many computer and technology companies started in the early '80s, including Apple and Microsoft. Adelson parlayed the success of COMDEX into the purchase of the Sands Hotel and Casino, demolishing the hotel to build the Venetian, and was among the first to expand gaming into China.

Name the company after yourself, make a fortune
Our last hard-working billionaire redefined the way that consumers bought PCs. Michael Dell was the son of an orthodontist and a stockbroker. Early affluence did not prevent young Michael from working for himself, investing early earnings into stocks and precious metals as a teenager. Later, while at college, he started an informal business upgrading the computers of other students at the University of Texas. This would be the early entity of what would soon become Dell (Nasdaq: DELL  ) . Instead of designing a new type of PC, Dell made the customization of PCs the name of the game and was soon reporting about $1 million in sales per day from its website. Though it has lost a bit of luster lately, there was a time in the 1990s when Dell was the world's largest PC maker.

A few of many
These are just three examples of megabillionaires who simply took advantage of opportunities presented to them. There are many more. Was there some luck involved in their success? I think so. But there are other components of success beyond luck. If we could predict the future, we could rush headlong into the next big thing before anyone else and make our billions. Or you can do what these three brilliant men did and simply "build a better mousetrap" within things that already exist. The choice is yours. In the meantime, add these three companies to you My Watchlist to track what these men do in the future.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Robert Eberhard longs to be in the 1% but owns no shares of the companies mentioned here. Follow him on Twitter, where he goes by @GuruEbby. The Motley Fool owns shares of Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple, Dell, and Microsoft and creating bull call spread positions in Microsoft and Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2011, at 10:57 AM, whereaminow wrote:

    There is luck in every aspect of life. it's not limited to the wealthy. How lucky the poor are to live in a time where rich people walk around in cargo shorts and tee shirts =D You can't even tell the difference anymore.

    But the poor are just as lucky to be born in America as the rich. They have iPods, 40" plasma TVs, laptops, cellphones, etc. None of these things were available in 1643, so the poor must be lucky too!

    This study that Alex referenced is another in a century long effort by University academics to explain why everybody else can get wealthy except them. Of course, they never stop to consider their own luck. Nor do they consider the luck it takes to be the supreme socialist leader. It's far more likely that the President will come from "lucky" roots than a successful entrepreneur.

    Maybe the President should take a pay cut.

    David

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2011, at 11:52 AM, WikiCPA wrote:

    So after dissecting and attacking the OWS movement, i've noticed they've changed their stance to 'against the 1% wealthy' to 'against the marginalization of workers' to 'against the corporatism that plays in lobbying congress'

    What is it really about now? It can't be about money, or high executive pay. Our capitalist society demands that, and Lloyd Blankfein is another great example you should add to your article. He's doing things that no human being should/imagined of, you just don't see it on the news.

    IMHO, it is too late to change things. The ones who will change our democracy and economy are already in position, they are the students that have just got jobs and graduated college. They will be the next 1%, so I don't see any point to this OWS/Bank Transfer movement.

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2011, at 12:05 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    I am a member of the so-called 1%.

    I work 10 to 11 hour days and often on weekends. I have a waiting list for the services I provide, I employ many americans at decent wages, and I've contributed $millions in taxes to the betterment of our country.

    Because I've taken substantial risks to achieve what I have, my wealth has fluctuated substantially with the economic times... fluctuations which most americans would not tolerate.

    My greatest concern for the young people of America is that the efforts of "occupy wall street" will have the effect of closing off the "avenues" of success... that taxes, regulations and a myriad of penalties on success will continue to make it increasingly impossible to "become" wealthy, just as it did in the countless of socialist countries that came before us.

    The American dream is dying in those tents on Wall Street. The principles they espouse will make it harder and harder to get ahead through hard work... and only people with those principles have the abundance of free time to sit in those tents, day after day.

    S

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2011, at 1:06 PM, TMFGuruEbby wrote:

    spokanimal,

    I agree with your sentiments. I think a better use of all these OWS people's time would be to strive to become a member of the "1%" instead of expecting it to be handed to them. Luck is taken out of the occasion once you start acting on opportunities as these three billionaires did. There are many more stories like this, and fewer stories about somebody joining the "1%" without trying.

    Thanks for reading!

    TMFGuruEbby

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2011, at 1:16 PM, DividendsBoom wrote:

    Good article, Robert. I think I am in about the top 50 percent, last year it was the top 60 percent, next year hopefully it will be the top 40 percent, so on and so forth.

    If OWS turned into occupy the tax code, they might get a better response.

    Having worked in three states so far this year, having a child, starting two small companies (less than 30k revenue), hiring my first employee in a third business, and transferring (merging) a 4th business into a partnership with two other people, not to mention making some capital purchases subject to depreciation and possibly incentives (who knows), and also that two of my businesses are seasonal and cross over year end. Other tax events to consider, income from selling options, capital gains income, dividends, interest income, rollover ira converting to a Roth, Roth ira, sep ira, owning a rental property, wishing I could own more mlp's but I'm too tired to own them outside my iras. Additionally made a loan to my in-laws at below market rates (not sure what the IRS implications are for that), of course tracking down charitable donations (not too difficult), moving expense deductions, I could continue. So who cares about all of this? Well me. Seventeen percent of my gross profit this year will go to my tax accountant. This doesn't even include my additional accounting expenditures for consulting and time spent before I turn it over. That is higher than the effective tax rate I will pay on this income. I understand that I am still the little guy and that my costs will spread out as I grow. Can't we have a tax code that I can handle? I would be willing to pay more if the cost of compliance were lowered, it would save me time, time I could spend being productive. Also, if small businesses are the job creators, wouldn't making it easier to stand being a small business owner create jobs?

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2011, at 7:00 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    @ TMF,

    Thanks for your comment. It's nice to hear from someone who has some appreciation for what my hard work has accomplished... not just for me, but for those who have benefitted from the taxes I've paid and the people I've employed.

    The vast majority of wealthy people worked for it... a very small percentage of multi-millionaires have it handed to them. You can't "become" wealthy without utilizing human leverage and investments that benefit others...

    ... yet it's the wealthy who are demonized in hollywood movies... or at least 98% of those that I've seen.

    A person who starts with little, and works all his life to become wealthy, then leaves behind much of what he earned... is, in my view, the most honorable among his fellow americans...

    ... for he who leaves the fruits of his labors behind is the person who contributed much more to our society than he took from it.

    S

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1585324, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 8:04:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 22 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
ORCL $26.14 Up +0.02 +0.08%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
LVS $47.92 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Las Vegas Sands Co… CAPS Rating: ***
DELL $12.46 Up +0.01 +0.08%
Dell CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement