Recs

7

Should We Be Worried About Abraxas' Debt?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Taking on too much debt may sound like a bad thing, but it's not always. Sometimes debt-laden companies can provide solid returns. Let's see how.

Generally, the cost of raising debt is cheaper than the cost of raising equity. Raising debt against equity has two observable consequences -- first, the equity that shareholders value doesn't get diluted, and second, it results in a higher interest expense. As interest is charged before tax, a higher interest rate provides a tax shield, thus resulting in higher profits. Higher profits coupled with a lower share count translate into higher earnings per share.

However, when assuming debt, a company should see whether the returns from investing the money are higher than the cost of the debt itself. If not, the company is headed for some serious trouble.

It's prudent for investors to see whether a company is strongly positioned to handle the debt it has taken on -- i.e., comfortably meet its short-term liabilities and interest payments. Let's look at two simple metrics to help us understand debt positions.

  • The debt-to-equity ratio tells us what fraction of the debt as opposed to equity a company uses to help fund its assets.
  • The interest coverage ratio is a way of measuring how easily a company can pay off the interest expenses on its outstanding debt.
  • The current ratio tells us what proportion of a company's short-term assets is available to finance its short-term liabilities.

And now let's examine the debt situation at Abraxas (Nasdaq: AXAS  ) and compare it with its peers.

Company

Debt-Equity Ratio

Interest Coverage

Current Ratio

Abraxas Petroleum

154.5%

1.4 times

0.5 time

Warren Resources (Nasdaq: WRES  )

42.0%

7.4 times

0.5 time

GMX Resources (NYSE: GMXR  )

260.1%

0.5 time

0.9 time

Callon Petroleum (NYSE: CPE  )

93.1%

2.8 times

2.9 times

Source: S&P Capital IQ.

Abraxas has a debt-to-equity ratio of 154.5%, which, compared to its peers', is quite high. However, the company has been reducing the load, and debt has fallen to $104.1 million from $144.03 million a year ago. This year, Abraxas upped its capital expenditure budget to $60 million, which is nearly a 66% increase over last year's budget. Nearly half of this was allocated for developing unconventional horizontal oil wells in Bakken/Three Forks and Niobrara shale plays in the Rocky Mountain area. And the rest will go into more conventional plays in the Premium Basin and onshore Gulf Coast.

Abraxas recently met with drilling success in South Texas' Eagle Ford shale play. Blue Eagle, a joint venture of Abraxas and Rock Oil Co., drilled three wells in the play and plans to drill two more this year. Blue Eagle's two wells in DeWitt County currently produce 800 barrels and 1,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day. These new wells in Texas would help ramp up the company's production capacity.

Though Abraxas' current ratio is quite low, its interest coverage ratio of 1.4 times indicates that it is generating enough revenue to pay off interest requirements.

The company had been suffering a string of quarterly losses but managed to turn that around in its second quarter, recording a 69% jump in profits coupled with a 14% rise in revenue from a year ago. In its most recent quarter (the third quarter) Abraxas' profits rose more than two times from the preceding quarter. Thus, things are on the up for the Texas-based company.

In the quarter, it managed to increase production by 5% against the preceding quarter and is looking to hike output further in the coming quarters. These efforts may help Abraxas register more revenue and help increase cash flows. So if things go as planned, it should manage to reduce its debt going forward. While fellow Fool Isac Simon feels that the stock might not have that much to offer, the reduction in debt and increased production are things worth taking a look at.

To stay up to date on all the top news and analysis on Abraxas, click here to add it to your stock watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Shubh Datta doesn't own any shares in the companies mentioned above. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2011, at 3:04 PM, Teacherman1 wrote:

    Should you be worried?

    I don't know, do you own any shares in it?

    I do, and I am not the least worried.

    You posed a question and then didn't really give an answer. If you think investors should be worried, then say so, say why and say it clearly.

    As I have responded to several of these articles on AXAS by others who have written about them here, you can not simply look at the financials and use that as your basis of evaluation.

    Here is a short history lesson on AXAS.

    Until 2009, they were simply the general partner in Abraxis Partnership, holding about 48%.

    They had no debt.

    When Lehman helped cause the global economy to get "flushed down the toilet", the IPO which was about to take place, went away.

    So in 2009, they had to go another route. They consolidated the partnership into AXAS, took on debt, and basically started from there.

    They implemented their strategy of selling off non core assests, entered into a joint venture, and started to drill in earnest.

    To get the funds needed to take this forward, they issued a lot of new shares. They used a portion of this to pay down debt, and the rest to "gear up" their operation.

    When you basically start from "scratch", it takes time to get to profitability, so no, they don't have a long history of being profitable, but they are moving in the right direction and will get there sooner than a lot of people think.

    They must be doing something right, since they have both a large insider and institutional ownership in their stock.

    Using their credit line, and cash from the joint venture, they established a CAPEX of $60M for 2011, and announced a CAPEX of $70M for 2012.

    They sensibly used derivatives to cover themselves against wild fluctuations in the markert for both their OIL and their GAS production for 2011, 2012, and 2013.

    Having such derivitives in place is good for protection, but limits them somewhat in earnings.

    They have steadily increased production to the level that they anticipate ending the year at between 4,700 and 4,900 barrels equivalent per day, which at their average "swap" of $75 per barrel, would give them revenue of between $128M and $134M per year, and that is before you include any new production.

    While they are moving toward a 50/50 ratio of Oil to Gas, they also have very good "swaps" on their gas production.

    They are operating in a variety of locations with different types and costs required for production.

    I happen to believe the future is very bright for them, but anything can happen.

    The EPA could "outlaw" fracking tomorrow, which would cause them, and most other O & G companies a lot of problems, but they do have plays that don't require fracking.

    If you don't feel comfortable with investing in O & G companies, then don't.

    As with any investment, there is always risk, but there can also be reward.

    I happen to think that in their case, the reward far outweighs the risk.

    JMO and worth exactly what I am charging for it.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1734395, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 10:52:15 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
AXAS $2.56 Down -0.07 -2.66%
Abraxas Petroleum… CAPS Rating: ****
WRES $2.28 Down -0.01 -0.44%
Warren Resources,… CAPS Rating: ***
GMXR $0.92 Down -0.01 -1.08%
GMX Resources, Inc… CAPS Rating: ***
CPE $4.54 Down -0.08 -1.73%
Callon Petroleum C… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement