Recs

22

3 Stocks I'm Keeping, 5 That Are Getting the Boot

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner has been pounding the table on a topic he refers to as "Moneyballing the Financial World."

I urge you to read all three parts of David's series, but, in short, the idea is simple: If somebody is writing about stocks, they should be held accountable for what they're saying. His venue of choice for keeping tabs is The Motley Fool's CAPS community, where investors can give a thumbs-up or -down on thousands of stocks (for free!).

For me, a Fool writer who's been following David's philosophy for some time now, his push means continuing to enter new calls in my CAPS portfolio, as well as keeping up on calls that I've previously made. Today, I'm going to do some of the latter.

You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here
My timing on both Ingersoll-Rand (NYSE: IR  ) and Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM  ) was fantastic. I waded against the angst-filled tide of early 2009 and gave both stocks a thumbs-up -- Ingersoll in late January and Yum! in early February. The market as a whole has done quite well over the three years since I made those calls, but the stocks have done even better. Both have more than doubled, and what's more is that the gains in each case have doubled, or nearly doubled, the gains of the S&P 500.

Needless to say, I'm happy with those two thumbs-ups. However, I'm bidding farewell to both today. Both of these are fine companies and, in particular, I like the very strong presence that Yum! has in the rapidly growing Asian markets. That said, both sport valuations that suggest investors are well-informed about the quality of these two companies. With decidedly less upside, I'd rather cut them loose today and wait to see whether Mr. Market puts them on sale again in the future.

And while I can cheerfully bid adieu to Ingersoll and Yum!, I'm less excited to highlight TBS International. As part of a broader bet that shipping companies were undervalued even as the industry looked bleak, I gave TBS a thumbs-up midway through 2010. It's since been crushed by its debt load and an increasingly difficult dry-bulk market. With the stock down a cool 97% from where I jumped in, it's time to admit that this one was a whiff.

Gone nowhere
To look at my CAPS scores for ArcelorMittal (NYSE: MT  ) and Corning (NYSE: GLW  ) (-64 and -67, respectively), you might suspect that the stocks have performed horribly. In fact, in the three years since I gave each a thumbs-up, Arcelor has only fallen about 8%, and Corning has added 1.5%. Nothing to cheer about in any case, but at the same time, the S&P has had a big rally, meaning that both underperformed significantly.

Today, both companies are facing challenges. As the world's largest steelmaker, Arcelor doesn't thrive when major developed economies like the U.S. and the European Union are sluggishly growing or stalling out. Meanwhile, in a recent earnings release, Corning badly disappointed investors as it said it's "resetting expectations" for the profitability of the display industry.

That said, I still see both of these as solid businesses that will continue producing products that will be in demand. And with the above concerns very front and center in investors' minds, I believe the valuation on both stocks provides a good deal more room for upside than downside -- particularly in the case of Arcelor.

Cashing out
If you've been keeping count, thus far I've cut loose three stocks and shown continued support for two. And what of the final three stocks I promised in the headline? That brings us to the casino industry.

Going back to 2009 one more time, I gave outperform ratings to Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) , MGM Resorts (NYSE: MGM  ) , and Wynn Resorts (Nasdaq: WYNN  ) . Being a Las Vegas resident myself, I could see that things looked pretty awful, but in each case I thought that -- as noted above for Arcelor and Corning -- the market was providing more room for upside than downside.

And, oh my, was there upside. Among the three stocks, I racked up a combined 619 points on CAPS.

Today, though, I look at Las Vegas Sands and see a company with a lot of good properties and a voracious appetite for growth, but it's a stock that I don't find especially compelling. With MGM, I see a company with a far less attractive stable of properties and a price that isn't as dirt cheap as it once was. And so I'm ending my outperform calls on both.

As for Wynn, admittedly the valuation isn't much (if any) more attractive than Las Vegas Sands'. However, I think Wynn has great properties, and I appreciate Steve Wynn's conservatism as well as the fact that Wynn is the only one of the three that pays a dividend. So while I may not have especially high hopes for huge returns out of Wynn, it will continue to have a thumbs-up from me.

More stocks, all dividends
As my CAPS loyalty to Wynn suggests, I'm partial to companies that share the wealth with investors through dividends. And though I dig Wynn, there are a lot of companies out there that are even better dividend payers. Eleven such companies can be found in The Motley Fool's special report "Secure Your Future With 11 Rock-Solid Dividend Stocks." You can grab a free copy by clicking here.

And, of course, if you have a view on any of the stocks above, be sure to make your own call on CAPS.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The Motley Fool owns shares of Corning, Arcelor Mittal, and Yum! Brands. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Yum! Brands and Corning. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Fool contributor Matt Koppenheffer owns shares of ArcelorMittal, but does not have a financial interest in any of the other companies mentioned. You can check out what Matt is keeping an eye on by visiting his CAPS portfolio, or you can follow Matt on Twitter @KoppTheFool or Facebook. The Fool's disclosure policy prefers dividends over a sharp stick in the eye.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 4:47 PM, cp757 wrote:

    Interesting article Matt but I think you should take some other factors into your thinking process.

    In the next 24 to 36 mo Marina Bay Sands the biggest casino in Singapore will have more revenue than 41 casinos in Las Vegas .Combine the Market Cap of the 41 casinos and see what you get.

    In the next 36 to 48 mo Macau will have more gambling revenue than the entire United States combined and LVS will have half of the capacity in Macau and Cotai Central and a large share of the market

    LVS has the Number one casino in Pennsylvania with Sands Bethlehem ! Pennsylvania has more revenue than Atlantic city with over 3 Billion in revenue.

    WYNN and MGM are looking to build in the future

    ( they cant open any new casinos until 2017) so do they have a chance to double revenue?No new casinos from them. Not to mention MGM has to compete with 140,000 rooms in Vegas and has huge debt.

    LVS will declare a dividend at the CC did you want to give that information on Wednesday?

    M F has had a two star rating on this stock that you liked back in 2009 and they still have a two star rating.

    If you had invested 30,000 in 2009 in this stock you would not be doing what you are doing you would have over 1 million dollars in LVS shares with your shares on the way to 5 million.But that's Investing 101.

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 5:32 PM, spokanimal wrote:

    Matt,

    I read through your pages and pages of reasoning as to why you are a seller of Las Vegas Sands... then I read it again and realized that there WERE no pages and pages of reasoning... Simply:

    "it's a stock that I don't find especially compelling".

    As a result, I'm completely convinced of your investment accumen and I will completely unload my position TOMORROW based on your reasoning.

    Thanks so much... I don't know what I would do without you (sic)

    S

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 5:43 PM, cp757 wrote:

    Matt I forgot the graph of your 8 picks from 2009 until now. Here it is.But MF still has a two star could you explane this?

    http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=LVS+Interactive#symbol=lv...

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 7:09 PM, xxatrm wrote:

    Matt, Matt, Matt, poster spokanimal made a good point, your article is lacking Facts, Facts, Facts, you know what I mean?

    LVS has:

    The largets foot print in Macau

    The Biggest Casino in Macau

    The Most Casinos in Macau

    The Most Hotel Rooms in Macau

    The Biggest Casino in The World

    The ONLY Gaming co. opening up a Casino (2 of them) in Macau for the next 4 years along with almost 6,000 Hotel Rooms and it's making a lot of Money. Have you heard of Sands Cotai Central?

    Did you know LVS still has Macau Lot 3 to develop?

    One of the Only 2 Casinos in Singapore & one of the 2 Most Profitable Casinos in The World MBS, in Singapore

    I could go on & on but what's the use. You tried to do a hatchet job on LVS but I don't think anyone will pay attention to your Fact Lacking article.

    LVS has what you want in any Stock, Growing Revenue, Growing EPS and Future Growth.

    You apparently like WYNN which is is lacking Growth in Macau until possibly 2015/2016.

    MGM is done IMO, it has 2 much Debt with not enough revenue to pay it off.

    Game, Set, Match, LVS wins.

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 7:29 PM, Renald1 wrote:

    I'm trying to find this energyrequest.fool.com.

    I keep hearing about it on the radio but when I type it in I dont recieve any information.

    Help

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Renald1 wrote:

    Sorry thats should be energyreport.fool.com

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 9:13 PM, TMFKopp wrote:

    Hey folks, thanks for the comments. A couple quick thoughts:

    - In some articles I really drill down and look deeply at a stock. In others, I take a quicker look at multiple stocks at once. The article above is one of the latter. Though I'm glad that it can provide a forum in the comments for more substantive / probing thoughts about the stocks in question.

    - @cp757 - with regard to the chart you linked to, bear in mind that we're considering investing in the LVS of today, not the LVS of 2009. That chart doesn't tell us a whole lot except that 2009 was a great time to invest in LVS.

    - A lot of the details about LVS cited in the comments are great and right on point. But the problem is that you can't simply consider the high points of a company (management, product, growth opportunities, etc) in a vacuum. That all needs to be looked at in relation to how the market / investors are valuing the stock. At the present time, I see a lot to like about LVS, but, in my view at least, that all appears to be already priced into the stock. And before anyone jumps on the fact that the same could be said about Wynn -- yes, that's true. However, as noted in the article, I like the conservatism of Wynn's approach and believe that ratchets down the risk in Wynn shares. Growth is great, but investing is about more than just potential growth.

    Thanks again for reading and taking the time to comment.

    Matt

  • Report this Comment On January 31, 2012, at 9:59 PM, cp757 wrote:

    If David Gardner had picked LVS in 2009 we would have a news letter every week telling us that he picked a winner that went up over 3000% and you need to subscribe to his letter. What do you do sit around in a meeting and decide which stocks to pump.You don't even try to hide your bias,You said " while I may not have especially high hopes for huge returns out of Wynn, it will continue to have a thumbs-up from me."That is not a reason to recommend a stock. Investors want to have a reason to buy a stock and the reason is it will go up in value .A lot. You could have said that he was building a new casino at the Aqueduct Racetrack in Queens except he decided not to. Or you could have said he was going to build a casino in Japan with Kazuo Okada,a man that owns the majority of the pachinko gambling halls in Japan and owns 20% of Wynn and is Steve Wynns partner . Except Steve Wynn fired his partner and now his partner has opened a casino in Manila without Wynn.You could explain that he has a new casino that he will open in Cotai Central except that wont finish until 2017.You could say that Wynn was going to get into online gambling with a partnership with Isai Scheinberg of PokerStars except he fired him after he started the partnership .You decided Wynn was the stock you would stick with because"I appreciate Steve Wynn's conservatism ". I guess he is on David Gardners list and Las Vegas Sands is not.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2012, at 8:21 AM, DCUDFlyer wrote:

    Wow, alot of frustration w/ this article in the comments section.

    First off, I agree 100% with MT and GLW, both have great upside and I believe will outperform S&P in the next 3-5 yrs.

    As for LVS, I agree that no facts were presented to back up TMFKopp's "thesis" other than his gut feeling (which if you're looking for investing advice, it wasnt here), but at the same time I dont think the intent of this article was provide a thorough analysis of the casion/gaming industry. Not the best article, but CERTAINLY didnt miss the mark as bad as some of the commenters have insinuated.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2012, at 10:05 AM, cp757 wrote:

    Matt you said- @cp757 - with regard to the chart you linked to, bear in mind that we're considering investing in the LVS of today, not the LVS of 2009. That chart doesn't tell us a whole lot except that 2009 was a great time to invest in LVS.The Chart shows that LVS has increased share price in the past over the other stocks that you listed because they increased revenue.Run the numbers and tell me which company will add 4 billion in additional revenue in 2012.The stock is priced to perfection,please. This stock was at 55 dollars a share in 2010 when they did 5 billion in total revenue when all of the casinos in Vegas did 5.9 billion in revenue.That's 41 casinos in Vegas and now LVS is at over 9 billion in revenue and you think its priced to perfection .You said "Growth is great, but investing is about more than just potential growth" are you kidding what was it that made you feel any of the other stocks would go up. Future earnings of LVS will take it to 13.9 billion in 2012. No other casino stock will do that . If you click the past MF articles button and go back to 2009 and read every article about LVS the fool has slammed it every time with terrible articles and at best a few back handed compliments over 900 articles. You still have not answered how you can keep a company like this at two stars for three years. Your comments about " market / investors are valuing the stock" are humorous when you read the 900+ articles slamming the stock but you are right LVS went up almost 4000% in spite of Motley Fools constant hammering and it will continue to go up. Every writer in the articles said they" liked LVS since 2009 but."They liked it because they saw it going up but never recommended it. I have never had an answer to the two star issue or MF bias about the stock and I probably never will . LVS has gone up almost 4000% without the help of MF and they will continue on that same projection.This is as much about MFs bias as anything else.

  • Report this Comment On February 01, 2012, at 1:55 PM, TMFKopp wrote:

    @cp757

    To be clear if you're referring to "MFs bias" based on articles on Fool.com -- take note that there is no "company line" on any stock. If a given Fool.com writer likes or doesn't like a particular stock, they're free to express that opinion whether or not the stock has been recommended by a newsletter or even is owned by The Fool itself. Case in point, I have rarely had great things to say about Netflix and that's a long-time Fool newsletter recommendation.

    If, however, you're referring to the two-star rating on CAPS (http://caps.fool.com/Ticker/LVS.aspx), note that that rating not an opinion of anyone internally at TMF, but rather the result of the underperform and outperform calls given by the CAPS community.

    On that note, I notice that you started making picks in your CAPS portfolio back in December (with LVS no less!). Welcome to the community! CAPS is designed for exactly this purpose -- you've got your CAPS thumb up on LVS and I've ended mine. If you end up being right, you have a line in the sand to point to and can say "I believed in LVS and here's proof."

    Up until now, I've believed enough in LVS to have it as an outperform in my own CAPS portfolio. Now, if I'm wrong and it continues its run, my CAPS score will miss out on those points. What this also means is that if, two years down the road, LVS' stock has had a massive run and I come back and write "I knew this was coming all along," you can call me out on it and note that if I had really believed in the stock I would have kept it in my CAPS portfolio.

    This goes back to how I started the article above and David Gardner's push for more accountability in financial writing. In 2009, I wrote that I liked LVS and its valuation and so I gave it a thumbs up in CAPS. Today, I don't like the opportunity as much, so I ended that call. If the situation gets extreme enough that I believe the stock is worth shorting, I will put a thumb down on CAPS.

    Consider that in comparison to other financial outlets where writers make various calls on stocks but there is no easy way for readers to quickly check to see how much conviction the writer actually has in the call. Or -- in the case of overall CAPS scores -- whether the writer in question has a track record of making good stock calls.

    I appreciate the passion! Fool on!

    Matt

  • Report this Comment On February 02, 2012, at 12:31 AM, cp757 wrote:

    Matt that clears things up but it sounds like you are saying there is a flaw with the Fool rating system that prevents the members community ratings from recognizing that a stock that has huge expansion from 09 to the present is a 5 star stock.The stock just announced that earnings climbed 36%, with quarterly revenue of $2.54 billion and declared a one dollar dividend .Going into the future they will do 15 billion for 2012 so prospects look good going into the future.The two star rating will stay the same even when they get to 30 billion .Looking at the data in the system I was wondering what happens to a member that has a position but never updates and never looks back at his portfolio.Has anyone ever thought of taking any folders not accessed in 24 months out of the system?The Fool community posters from 09 posted the company was going bankrupt and those members have -3900 scores and have never closed the position .I think this two star rating could be adjusted to reflect the real score by doing two things. First the writers on the stock could be changed since both dropped out and try to find analyst with a better feel for the gamming business and more on balance. LVS did 2.54 billion this quarter , that's twice what most will do and none of the articles point this out and they just keep getting it wrong .And second Motley Fool could look at why the system does not pick up a 4000% point move .I do think the big culprit in the problem is this was a company that Fool members posted as bankrupt and gave it a low rating in 09 when the stock was at $1.38. If this had been a stock that started at $1.38 it would have been a 5 star long ago giving more investor on the Fool a better chance to make money.JMHO

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1769795, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 11:24:41 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
MT $14.30 Up +0.01 +0.07%
ArcelorMittal CAPS Rating: *****
WYNN $102.04 Down -1.19 -1.15%
Wynn Resorts, Limi… CAPS Rating: **
MGM $10.80 Down -0.04 -0.37%
MGM Resorts Intern… CAPS Rating: ***
GLW $12.91 Up +0.10 +0.78%
Corning, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
LVS $47.92 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Las Vegas Sands Co… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement