The Incredible Bargain of Eldorado Gold

Some folks just have a knack for walking the path less traveled -- something this gold miner has been doing all along.

Eldorado Gold (NYSE: EGO  ) has set itself apart from the competition in multiple ways. For starters, the company has a tendency to focus its operations in regions where few of its U.S.-traded competitors have a foothold. That trait was evident first in the company's highly successful foray into China, and more recently in its bold move into Greece with the $2.4 billion acquisition of European Goldfields earlier this year.

Second, and of particular interest to shareholders, the company has tended to deliver returns that the majority of its competitors have simply failed to provide through this famously challenging period for the gold mining industry at large. As the following chart will show, Eldorado Gold's 140% advance over the trailing-five-year period has this miner walking its own road as a clear outperformer among the mid-tier miners of gold. Rivals Yamana Gold (NYSE: AUY  ) and New Gold (NYSE: NGD  ) have managed to outperform the dismal 8.5% advance of the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE: GDX  ) .

EGO Chart

EGO data by YCharts.

Recalling the company's many successes, and even its own share of setbacks along the way toward one of the industry's most aggressive production growth forecasts, I find myself flabbergasted to see these shares trading as low as they have been lately. Sure, the 20% reduction in anticipated 2012 production -- from an initial target of 808,000 ounces to the revised 660,000 ounces revealed this week -- presents adequate cause for a haircut. But investors need to understand that none of the production shortfalls recorded in the miner's second-quarter results represented game-changing issues of any kind. Eldorado has amassed a sizable stockpile of gold concentrate from the Efemcukuru mine in Turkey (containing 42,000 ounces of gold) that awaits final processing at the Kisladag mill, and the Jinfeng mine in China suffered a major production decline (45% year-over-year) as the operation strips waste from the open pit. These are strictly near-term setbacks, and so Eldorado's long-term growth outlook remains intact.

Still a golden ticket even with adjusted expectations
However, acute increases in mine construction costs and operating costs have forced even major miner Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX  ) to dramatically revise project economics and reassess its growth trajectory. Working a sizable margin of safety into the industry's growth projections is therefore a wholly sensible adaptation for investors. So when Eldorado speaks of achieving 160% production growth over the next five years (targeting 1.7 million ounces by 2016), I am inclined to adjust my own expectations to a more conservative range of 1.2 million to 1.4 million ounces by 2016. After all, I'd much rather be surprised to the upside than vice versa! Since that adjusted expectation still represents a prompt doubling of output from the company's revised 2012 target, I see plentiful opportunity for meaningful earnings growth to drive further outperformance for the stock within my adjusted scenario.

Speaking of adjusted expectations, let's have a look at how the market valuation of Eldorado's growing reserve base fits into our discussion of the bargain I perceive the current share price. In February 2011, I compared market valuations of proven and probable gold reserves among a group of popular miners, and found Eldorado's enterprise value at the top of the heap (at 42%) relative to the value of its underground reserves. Since that time, Eldorado's corresponding valuation has plummeted to just 18% of the market value ($44.39 billion at $1,620 gold) of its newly expanded reserve base (27.4 million ounces). Stated another way, Eldorado's enterprise value is equivalent to just $287 for each of the miner's reserve ounces. That's 38% less than Goldcorp's corresponding reserve valuation of $452 per ounce. Although I consider Goldcorp the best of the majors, I find no justification whatsoever for a reserve-valuation disconnect of such proportion.

Of course, reserve ounces only retrieve their peak shareholder value when they come out of the ground, so any thorough attempt to value miners must also hone in on projected earnings and cash flow. By applying consensus metal-price assumptions to its own production targets, Eldorado envisions $1.8 billion in operating profit by 2015. After applying my own adjustments to yield a more conservative production outlook, I still find the current share price representing an unreasonably low multiple to the anticipated profitability looming on Eldorado's horizon.

Even if Eldorado were to produce an operating profit of just $1.2 billion in 2015, the current market capitalization stands at just 6.5 times that figure. And for a crude price-to-2015-earnings snapshot, let's apply the recent second-quarter relationship between operating profit and net profit (again using my adjusted conservative production estimates), and I am comfortable anticipating 2015 profit of $675 million. At just 11.4 times that figure, I consider shares of Eldorado Gold extremely desirable at this juncture. I will continue to maintain my bullish CAPScall on the stock, which has been in place without interruption since 2007. And I will continue to scour this gold market for outlandish bargains like this one, and invite readers to bookmark my article list or follow me on Twitter.

Fool contributor Christopher Barker can be found blogging actively and acting Foolishly within the CAPS community under the username TMFSinchiruna. He tweets. He owns shares of Eldorado Gold and Goldcorp. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (14)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 01, 2012, at 4:03 PM, pondee619 wrote:

    Aren't you the fool who told us "How to Buy Silver at a 93% Discount By Christopher Barker February 24, 2012?"

    My CAPS line on that issue: "02/29/12 PAAS $25.44 $14.84 ( -0.67%) -41.49% +0.50% -41.98" Negative 41.49 since your article, negative 41.98 aganist the market since your article. Please explain how, or why, this pick is any better. thanks

  • Report this Comment On August 02, 2012, at 10:37 AM, XMFSinchiruna wrote:

    pondee619,

    I am one and the same, and yours is a perfectly fair question.

    Here's a link to my Pan American article to give readers some context:

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/02/24/how-to-buy-...

    Let's begin with the unfortunate fact that the relevant industry ETF (Global X Silver Miners ETF) has declined 28.5% since the date my article appeared. Here's a chart showing Pan American and other major silver producers over the period since my article appeared. The price of silver itself has dipped 23% over the period, representing another typically volatile move for the metal within the context of this ongoing correction.

    http://media.ycharts.com/charts/4393ca5abe6e4a37ac34db3cfdc7...

    Finally, some rather extraordinary developments specific to Pan American have roiled the share price in ways that were not simple elements to predict. First, after speaking in glowing terms about Orko Silver's La Preciosa project and its strategic value to the company, Pan American abruptly backed out of that joint venture and stripped an exciting growth project from its pipeline. Next, provincial authorities in Argentina took moved aggressively to demand a major slice of the Navidad project as a condition for regulatory approval, and as a result Pan American has indicated it will sooner walk away from the project than proceed under terms that render the project uneconomic.

    Now, a couple of points. If you believe the 23% dip in silver prices since February 24 represents a lasting or permanent decline, then silver miners would not be a suitable place for you to invest. My value analysis was based in the context of prevailing silver prices at the time, and with the well-supported expectation for additional long-term appreciation of the silver price.

    If the Navidad project ultimately turns out to be a no-go, then any construct of fair value would have to be adjusted accordingly, though it appears at this stage that the market is offering little if any value at all for Navidad. Which brings me to my final point.

    Over the years I have consistently highlighted the importance of approaching this industry through a basket of quality stocks in order to mitigate the regulatory / jurisdictional / execution risk that abounds among miners. By maintaining an undaunted long-term perspective, utilizing the basket approach to mitigate risk, and scouring for deep value in quality operators, I believe investors have an excellent shot at dramatically outperformaing the market over the remainder of the precious metals bull market.

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1967101, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/19/2014 8:32:23 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement