Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Is New Symantec CEO Steve Bennett Worth $1.5 Billion? Not a Chance

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

The somewhat surprising July 25 announcement that Enrique Salim's three-year tenure as Symantec (Nasdaq: SYMC  ) CEO had ended -- and the reign of Chairman Steve Bennett had begun -- put the lead change front and center. And that was on top of Symantec's fiscal Q1 earnings announcement. Trading volume nearly five times the norm and a 13% jump in share price were proof that the news captured the attention of investors. But what's really changed to warrant a $1.5 billion (give or take) increase in company value?

Quarterly results
Though not necessarily bad, Symantec's earnings certainly don't warrant a double-digit jump in share price and the subsequent $11 billion market cap. Revenue was essentially flat year over year (up 0.9%) and down sequentially from last quarter. Operating income was lower than the same quarter last year, as were earnings and virtually every financial measure worth reviewing.

Profit margin dropped to a shade over 10%, and both return on assets and return on equity were nearly half what they were in Q1 of 2011. But three things worked in Symantec's favor: operating margins didn't drop (flat by comparison), the $0.43 a share earned during the quarter beat analyst expectations by $0.05, and the aforementioned change in leadership was apparently viewed as a godsend.

The reality
Symantec stock has meandered from highs of $22 a share to lows around $11 (and all points in between) for much of the past five years or more. Some investors go even further back and (still) blame the $13.5 billion Veritas purchase in 2004 for the aimless meandering of the stock. Whatever the reason, the board and Steve Bennett had enough and determined the time for change was now. Apparently, so did investors.

But this is where things get sticky. Symantec continues to lose market share in its bread-and-butter market: antivirus software. The decline in PC sales around the globe and increased competition from the likes of Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) and CA (Nasdaq: CA  ) are wreaking havoc on Symantec's global and domestic market share.

Symantec now holds 10.3% of the global vendor antivirus market, down from 10.6% the beginning of 2012. Not huge, but in comparison, Microsoft's Security Essentials jumped 1.8% to 13.2%. Though Intel's (Nasdaq: INTC  ) McAfee acquisition has yet to make a real dent either domestically or internationally, it shouldn't be counted out just yet. And unfortunately for Symantec shareholders, the story is even worse here at home.

Though Symantec remains in second place in market share behind Microsoft, it's moving in the wrong direction while the other key players are improving. Microsoft had the biggest gain the first six months of 2012, jumping nearly 6% and now is the security provider of choice, with a 22% domestic market share. The second-biggest jump? CA's Total Defense has become a presence, and a menacing one for Symantec, gaining 4.7% market share in the U.S. in just two quarters.

The Steve Bennett effect
So what does Bennett bring to the Symantec CEO table, beyond his chairman duties? Certainly a great deal of experience. With 35 years of business background, much of which came at the CEO breeding ground that is GE, his resume is an impressive one. If nothing else, you can take heart in knowing senior management recognizes the need for the proverbial swift kick. Some folks are obviously hoping Steve will increase shareholder value by selling off assets, but his answer to that is a definitive "I'll get back to you."

One of his first steps was to politely ask folks to back off and give him three to four months for a "listening and learning" tour before making any major decisions. In answer to grumblings about selling assets, he was quoted as saying, "I wasn't brought in to sell the company." Of course, that doesn't mean eventually divesting Symantec of the Veritas business or the core antivirus unit is out of the question.

Not jumping into any rash decisions makes sense -- it'd be unwise to do anything else, regardless of background or experience. But betting on new leadership to change what has been a long (really, really long), ongoing story of mediocrity quickly -- whether by asset sales or strategic business changes -- just doesn't make sense.

It hasn't been an easy run of late for a lot of tech companies. Like Microsoft and Intel, however, there are values out there worthy of your attention. But don't neglect the smaller, seldom-reported opportunities, either. For a tech stock poised for growth, check out our special free report: "The Only Stock You Need To Profit From The NEW Technology Revolution."

Fool contributor Tim Brugger currently holds no securities positions, including any mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft and Intel. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Intel and Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services have also recommended creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2012, at 5:15 AM, MikeBlockCPA wrote:

    Tim Brugger does not know Steve Bennett like I did at Intuit. In eight years he tripled sales and quadrupled earnings, while finding time to quickly answer my many email questions and suggestions. Steve did so by completely training and selling his staff on the GE et al Six Sigma approach, while featuring customer appreciation like never before. I called for a TurboTax boycott over copy protection, while on an Advisory Council. Instead of dumping me, he solved the problem in hours and soon wrote, "Keep raising hell when Intuit does something wrong." As I gasped, I heard other Council members gasping at the intense things he wrote them. This took products like QuickBooks and Quicken to market shares of around 95%, without big price increases, for unprecedented renewal rates and profits.

    Making these type of changes and profits should be far easier for Steve the second time around. Symantec recently got down to a PE ratio of almost 9. Its PE averaged 25 and was as high as 57 in the last 5 years. Multiply earnings by four, in the next few years, and you will see why Symantec is grossly undervalued. I lost any doubt that Steve would soon correct this when he quickly and repeatedly responded to my emailed congratulations and suggestions. That is why I blogged on Steve Bennett, Symantec Chairman, CEO and Friend. I concluded that Mr. Brugger was wrong, since Symantec rose an extra 5% after he finished his article.

  • Report this Comment On November 24, 2012, at 7:46 AM, MikeBlockCPA wrote:

    I recently looked at this again. Brugger refers to when Symantec jumped 13% on five times the volume. This was July 25, when Bennett became CEO. The price jumped to $14.96 from $13.18. It is now $18.47 (11/23/12), so there was a 40% price and market capitalization increase since July 24. Capitalization is now $12.82 billion, so it was about $9.16 billion on July 24, This means Steve has been worth $3.66 billion to Symantec, not the $1.5 billion that Brugger said he was not worth.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1970082, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2016 11:32:26 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,223.03 77.32 0.43%
S&P 500 2,151.33 10.17 0.47%
NASD 5,309.83 52.43 1.00%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/24/2016 4:00 PM
SYMC $24.90 Up +0.82 +3.41%
Symantec CAPS Rating: ***
CA $32.62 Up +0.42 +1.30%
CA Technologies CAPS Rating: ***
INTC $35.26 Up +0.11 +0.31%
Intel CAPS Rating: ****
MSFT $61.00 Up +1.34 +2.25%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****