Citibank's Heart of Gold -- Huh?

Quick, somebody pinch me. I'm not dreaming, am I?

A huge and supposedly soulless financial institution is finally going to do the right thing, not only in terms of helping out people facing financial ruin and the likely loss of their homes, but also for its own bottom line and for its investors.

I'm talking about the news of Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) initiating a program to test the financial viability (and human decency) of not throwing late-paying borrowers out of their homes, but instead letting them lease their homes back after first signing the over the deeds to their homes.

This makes so much obvious sense that I have to wonder why no one has thought of this before.

Actually, it has been. Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) started it own "Mortgage to Lease" program back in March. BAC said then that it was starting the program off with less than 1,000 borrowers in Arizona, Nevada, and New York. It eventually grew to 2,500. Participants had to have been more than 60 days late with their mortgage payments, at "considerable risk" of foreclosure, and had exhausted all loan modification programs.

Citigroup's lease back program will start off with a much smaller footprint. It will offer the program to only 500 borrowers in Arizona, California, Texas, Florida, Nevada, and Georgia. To be eligible, they must be more than 120 days late with their payments and owe more than their homes are worth.

This type of program, called a "deed in lieu of foreclosure," was used during the Great Depression but fell out of favor when the economy picked up again. It took our recent foreclosure crisis for lenders to start considering it again.

The benefits of the lease back programs to be such a no-brainer that I am amazed that these programs haven't been started sooner. First off, Congressional estimates put the foreclosure process taking almost two years at a cost of almost $78,000 for each home. Then there is the real loss of value to the property itself if a borrower, underwater on the loan and unable to make its payments, just walks away from it all, leaving the house vacant and prone to vandalism.

In neighborhoods particularly hard-hit by financial woes, one vacant and vandalized home can lead to more until you have a whole blighted community on your hands. Who would want to buy a home in such an area? Property values start spiraling into the ground.

Bank of America executive Ron Sturzenegger told the AP at the beginning of its program that "If this evolves from a pilot into a more broadly based program, we also see potential benefits from helping to stabilize housing prices ... and curtail neighborhood blight by keeping a portion of distressed properties off the market."

CitiMortgage CEO Sanjiv Das gave a similar reason in a statement: "In addition to helping families by keeping homes occupied, the program assists neighborhood revitalization and stabilization efforts..."

Of course, Citi's and Bank of America's actions aren't being done just out of the goodness of their hearts. Los Angeles raised a furor last summer when it named German banking giant Deutsche Bank (NYSE: DB  ) the city's biggest slumlord and sued it for illegally evicting borrowers and allowing foreclosed homes to deteriorate.

The Treasury Department also got into the game when it said it would withhold payments to Bank of America, J.P. Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) , and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) for their failures in servicing loans under the Making Homes Affordable program.

So far, two banks have started "deed in lieu of foreclosure" programs, at least in a small way. There are many more lending institutions out there that could find it in their best interests to keep borrowed upon properties occupied, and many thousands of desperate home "owners" would welcome the opportunity of keeping their roofs over their heads.

Bank of America is one of the most widely traded stocks out there. Some feel this "too big to fail" bank is available now at a bargain basement price giving investors a great opportunity. But before you put your money down, do yourself a favor and read the Fool's Bank of America report. It will give you all the facts you need to make the right investment decision.

Fool contributor Dan Radovsky, other than some Citicorp issued mortgage-backed securities, has no other financial interest in any of the above-mentioned companies. The Motley Fool owns shares of Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Wells Fargo. Motley Fool newsletter services formerly recommended JPMorgan Chase. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 10, 2012, at 1:00 PM, BMFPitt wrote:

    So you're shocked that Citibank is doing something that will give them a revenue stream that buys them time before they have to realize smaller losses than they otherwise would have, and discourages people from destroying houses on the way out?

    Now that I think of it, it is surprising that Citi is smart enough to do that.

  • Report this Comment On August 10, 2012, at 2:20 PM, Darwood11 wrote:

    This actually makes sense. People have to live somewhere, and driving them out of their homes so they can rent only drives up the costs of rentals.

    There are a lot of options possible but it can be a lot of work for the creditors, be it the banks or whomever. This has hit HOAs particularly hard, because boards are comprised of volunteers and hiring pros to do this can be very expensive. I'm talking about lawyers, etc.

    Banks are getting smarter about some of their foreclosures.

    In Illinois, some condo associations have been seizing units that fall chronically behind in fee payments and renting them to catch up, after which they are returned to the owners. Now the banks have finally caught on and are renting their seized properties rather than allowing them to sit fallow. I'm speaking from personal experience in this matter. (This info passed on by our HOA property management firm).

    Some HOAs also allows some forms of payment plans for owners who have fallen behind in the monthly fees. There is a criteria, and the fees must be caught up in a short period.

    These are very challenging times!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1979815, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/22/2014 8:19:25 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement