Is the Gaming REIT a New Craze?

Penn National (Nasdaq: PENN  ) introduced a new concept in gaming last week: the gaming REIT. Gaming companies have not normally split real estate and operating assets, but after years of paying high tax rates, Penn National's management has had enough and is looking for ways to unlock value.

This isn't a new concept in business. Hotels converted to REITs years ago as a way to pay lower tax rates, and companies are trying to stretch the status as far as they can. Since a huge portion of a casino's development cost is real estate, it makes a lot of sense for the industry. But is this the beginning of a trend?

How the deal works
Penn National will be splitting itself into an operating company, still Penn National (no change here), and a publicly traded REIT that will own the casino real estate.

Penn will then distribute shares in a tax-free dividend that will include shares of the REIT's stock worth about $10.05 per share and a $5.35 cash dividend. The REIT will then pay an estimated annual dividend of $2.36 per share from the initial rent of $450 million paid by Penn National.

Got all of that? In the end, the point is to push earnings to a REIT, which doesn't pay taxes and instead passes earnings on to shareholders in the form of a dividend, taxed at ordinary income-tax rates. This skirts paying corporate taxes and capital-gains taxes.

The benefit
Barclays estimates that the REIT structure would allow Penn to save $160 million in U.S. taxes, although it will push some of that down to shareholders.

Penn can push a large amount of the $2.83 billion in revenue it has generated over the past year to the REIT, transferring profits in the process. REIT owners get cash flow, while Penn National owners get a gaming operator that is more leveraged than it was in the past.

The trend begins...or not
The question is whether or not this becomes a trend for gaming companies. Ameristar Casinos' (Nasdaq: ASCA  ) shares jumped 16% on Friday on speculation that it might try the same strategy. This could make some sense for regional U.S. operators like Ameristar or Boyd Gaming (NYSE: BYD  ) . But the benefit would be reduced, because each company is paying less in taxes.

BYD Provision for Income Taxes Quarterly Chart

BYD Provision for Income Taxes Quarterly data by YCharts.

It also doesn't make a lot of sense for MGM Resorts (NYSE: MGM  ) or Caesars Entertainment (Nasdaq: CZR  ) , which are both losing money and getting a benefit from taxes. If they ever turn profitable, however, the story may change.

Operators with most of their operations overseas would not benefit either, because REITs are a U.S. tax structure and wouldn't affect tax rates overseas. So we won't likely see Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) convert its properties into REITS.

The other big question is what it will do to the licensing of new casinos. Since these are separate companies, will it complicate matters for Penn or allow the REIT to own more casinos outside of Penn's network? We could speculate about the long-term implications, but they're really unknown at this point.

Foolish bottom line
What's good for one gaming company doesn't necessarily make sense for every gaming company. In this case, Penn National is one of the few U.S. gaming operators that have consistent profit and a reason to convert properties into REITs. For nearly every other company there would be little benefit. So it's a nice move for Penn and another reason I think this is the best regional gaming stock, but it won't become an industry trend. 

What has been an industrywide craze is the trend toward gaming in Asia, where Las Vegas Sands has a dominant position. The company is now looking to spread its empire further, but will it be able to replicate its prior successes? Learn about all these opportunities, and the risks they pose, in our brand-new premium report on Las Vegas Sands. We're providing a full year of analyst updates to go with it, so be sure to claim your copy today by clicking here.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 20, 2012, at 4:38 PM, BenKeel wrote:

    Motley Fool never ceases to amaze me. I've seen a few of their "analysts" on video and they all look like they're about 21 or 22. Here's the deal, according to Jon Litt, CEO and Founder of Land and Building Inc. :

    LVS would benefit even if the tax structure didn't benefit them right away because their gaming assets are "incredibly undervalued". By splitting up the company and creating separate entities, the gaming assets could show their true growth potential as well as their hotel & mall assets.

    He says the stock will DOYBLE from here and that the LVS board is "evaluating" spinning off the REIT assets. Sheldon Adelson would make almost $20Bill. overnight.

    Yeah right Motley, "not likely" in your words. Weren't you guys really bullish on US Steel at $40 last year?

  • Report this Comment On November 20, 2012, at 9:47 PM, cp757 wrote:

    BenKeel Travis has a whole list of stocks he likes they just dont do very well. This is the link to his picks.

    http://caps.fool.com/player/tmfflushdraw.aspx

    Travis has 28 stocks and he is wrong on 26 of them.

    On 07/26/2011 Travis picked SPWR at $20.45 and said it would go up. It went down to 3.99 cents. He is still waiting for it to go up.

    Travis likes links to be posted so this is his trades.

    http://caps.fool.com/player/tmfflushdraw.aspx

    On 07/26/2011 Travis picked GTAT at $14.46 and said it would go up. It went down to 3.12 cents. He is still waiting for it to go up.

    Travis likes links to be posted so this is his trades.

    http://caps.fool.com/player/tmfflushdraw.aspx

    01/31/2012 PANL he said buy at $41.92 it went down to $23.15

    09/26/11 he said but NFLX for $128.05 it went down to $82.40

    06/17/2011 buy AMRC for $13.49 and it went down to $9.25

    04/18/2011 KNL buy$19.15 went down to $13.78

    10/25/2010 MCRI buy$11.74 went down to $8.99

    01/28/2011 SCSC buy $36.84 it went down to $29.12

    Travis likes links to be posted so this is his trades.

    http://caps.fool.com/player/tmfflushdraw.aspx

    He is the worst, but that has been pointed out before.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2121314, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2014 5:36:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement