Who Benefits the Most From Fed Policy?

Washington Post columnist Neil Irwin stopped by to discuss his book, The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers and a World on Fire. It's a great read on the history of central banks, including how they responded to the financial crisis and the challenges they face in the future.

Who benefits from the Fed's easy money policies? Will Japan's extreme financial measures make themselves felt in other economies around the world? In this video segment, Neil fields some questions from the audience. A full transcript follows the video.

Audience Member: When we talk about easy money policies, I think a lot of people would look at that and go, "Oh, so this is only good for banks. This is going to help banks." When you look at the banks' reports lately, I think you'll find that it's (unclear). They don't necessarily want the (unclear) low interest rate loans. There's not a lot of demand for them. It really hasn't been a huge benefit for them, so who has benefited most from the easy money?

Neil Irwin: I think it's holders of any financial assets, particularly equities, even more so corporate debt, especially high-yield corporate debt. It's pretty easy to trace the direct rise.

It's amazing how consistent the pattern is of, any time Bernanke gives a speech that's just, "More QE is likely," you see it in equity markets and corporate debt markets right away. I think that's a very direct relationship.

The reason it hasn't been a boon for banks is for exactly the reason it hasn't been a panacea for the real economy. What banks fundamentally need is an economy where businesses are making investments, they're borrowing money to build a factory, or whatever it may be.

As long as that's happening, no matter how low interest rates are, that's not a great spot for a bank to be in. If there's no loan demand, you don't really have much of a business. I think that's one of the great mysteries of, "Will this easy monetary policy at some point kick in and result in more activity in the real economy?"

Audience Member: You talked about the economists in Japan monitoring what they do here. (unclear) that was based on their financial policies. Is there any risk of what Japan's doing, what Europe's doing, that what they're doing makes its way over to our asset markets, to our stock market (unclear), and even if the Fed has their finger on what they're doing, maybe there's other central banks that are going to have an influence on our market?

Neil: It's funny, that's exactly what the foreigners have been complaining about with QE in the U.S. over the years.

If you remember after QE 2, the Germans were furious. The Chinese were furious. The Brazilians were furious, because they felt like this money printing by the U.S. Fed would ultimately leach into financial imbalances, asset bubbles, and inflation in their own countries, and that they wouldn't have the power to stop it.

This is especially true for Brazil. I think for China it's a little more complicated.

Look, if there's one thing this last few years has taught, it's that it truly is a global economy, especially once you're in the financial system, and you can't analyze -- if you're the Fed trying to think about doing QE or the Bank of Japan, or the ECB -- you can't do that without understanding how that will interact in the global context.

Because of what I was talking about earlier with this sense of common purpose and this sense of mutual confidence among the central bankers, they're talking about it. I guarantee you, Bernanke doesn't do a new round of QE, or the Bank of Japan Governor, or the Bank of England Governor, they don't do it without having some serious talks with their counterparts.

It's not that I have absolute confidence they'll get it right and avoid any kind of inflationary burst or global asset bubbles. It's that I know if they fail, it will not be for lack of airing all the views and all the possibilities that might happen.

More from the Motley Fool
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 17, 2013, at 9:45 AM, GhostdogWarrior wrote:

    Brazil's market just hit the lowest levels since 2009. Guess it's working out well for them. ;o Oh and since you bring it up, over the years the Fed arguably has never gotten it right except under Volker so.... I guess you are right,. They dont always get it right

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2492704, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/26/2016 8:29:27 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,094.83 -166.62 -0.91%
S&P 500 2,146.10 -18.59 -0.86%
NASD 5,257.49 -48.26 -0.91%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes