A New Gold and Silver Boom Thanks to Bernanke

Considering most analysts anticipated that Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke would announce Wednesday he was finally easing off the throttle of his bond-buying program, the markets were overcome with shock and awe as he declared he had no plans whatsoever to halt his massive and infinite quantitative easing effort.

The stock market ripped to new record highs after the announcement on the understanding that the drunken excess was going to continue. Yet gold and silver also surged as buyers realized the accompanying hangover that will most assuredly come will be even more painful than before.

Source: Chart courtesy of www.kitcom.com

As savvy investor Marc Faber said, the Fed's position has become completely untenable and "the endgame is a total collapse, but from a higher diving board."

What the announcement also suggests is that the economy is far weaker than we were led to believe. The Fed cut by as much as 17% its estimates for GDP growth next year, from 3%-3.5% in June to 2.9%-3.1% on Wednesday, no doubt driven in large part by its estimates for personal consumption expenditures inflation tumbling by 10% at the high end to 1.8%. That's significant because the Fed has said it will not raise short-term interest rates -- keeping them near 0%  -- so long as PCE inflation is below 2.5% and unemployment rates remain above 6.5%. It expects unemployment to remain between 6.4% and 6.8% next year, though we all know the nonparticipation rate, the true measure of those without jobs, is at all-time record highs.

That bodes well for gold and silver to recover their role as hedges, and is why I've maintained all along there is a coming boom again in their prices. The miners themselves benefited from the news, most gaining double-digit percentage increases, though perhaps the greatest risk for them lies not in an economy that truly improves, but whether they've hedged production and to what extent.

Earlier this year Great Panther Silver, which jumped 11.5% yesterday, reported it had no hedges on its silver , while Pan American Silver (NASDAQ: PAAS  ) presciently just announced it was closing out all of its hedged silver and gold positions, which represented 20% and 18%, respectively, of its forecast production. At prices of roughly $20 per ounce for silver and $1,323 per ounce for gold, it could have sustained a serious impact if the precious metals take off as expected. Its stock was up 9% yesterday. Silver Wheaton (NYSE: SLW  ) is 100% unhedged and was up a like amount to Pan American.

On the other end, Hecla Mining (NYSE: HL  ) said last month it has begun hedging all of its metals once they're shipped as a means of protection from price volatility. The company said it had sold about 40% of its 2.2 million ounces of silver production in June, a month that featured a lower average silver price than that of the second quarter. It bemoaned the fact that silver prices fell 40% to $16.27 per ounce while spot prices dropped 21% to an average of $23.17 per ounce.

The positive note to take away from this is that Hecla's cash costs net of byproduct credits were still $5.56, down 21% from the first quarter.

Gold miners face the same conundrum. Ashanti Gold caused the precious metals miners to acknowledge the risks of hedging, as it took on contracts at precisely the wrong moment as gold spiked more than a decade ago. Subsequently sold to AngloGold (NYSE: AU  ) on the cheap because it was in such a weakened financial state, Ashanti became a cautionary tale for hedging -- and of doing business with Goldman Sachs, which played all sides in the miner's downfall.

Interestingly, it wasn't that long ago -- days, really -- that Goldman was once again advising gold miners to hedge their production, forecasting prices would fall as low as $1,050 per ounce. In the wake of Bernanke's full throttle speech, however, the investment banker reversed course and now sees more upside to the yellow metal. Yet just last month it was recommending investors sell their gold, even though it was a buyer itself.

The miners seemingly have avoided falling into the trap again of listening to the investment banker, and investors should take heart that they're better positioned to reap the windfall of the coming boom. Yet if Marc Faber is right, investors would do even better by being in physical possession of gold and silver than in stocks or ETFs trading in them.

All that is gold does glitter!
Gold has outshined the stock market with strong returns since 2000, but more recently has given way to big declines. The Motley Fool's new free report, "The Best Way to Play Gold Right Now," dissects the recent volatility and provides a guide for gold investing. Click here to read the full report today!


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (5)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2013, at 3:14 PM, pureairusa wrote:

    The Annunaki need gold for their atmosphere, sheesh, everybody knows that.

    I`ve been buying SIVR since june and plan to do so until the debt ceiling episode is aired. Yes its political, yes its fake. Just tell me when the correction will take place and we will all be happy.

    Peace.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2013, at 6:38 PM, SSBN620 wrote:

    Every stock you look at is at or near an all time high, yet consumer spending, which used to drive the markets, has been faltering. Gold and silver are the only things left that aren't maxed out, and you better believe Obama would rather default the debt than defund Obamacare in the upcoming battle. The next month could change EVERYTHING.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2013, at 9:45 PM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    Rich wrote:

    “Yet just last month it was recommending investors sell their gold, even though it was a buyer itself.”

    If this is true, and I trust that it is, why would you ever quote Goldman? They seem to have very low credibility.

    Sky

    Long several profitable gold and silver miners. Formerly, long GS. Sold at a nice profit.

  • Report this Comment On September 20, 2013, at 7:17 AM, TMFCop wrote:

    skypilot2005,

    It is indeed true and if you look at their role in Ashanti Gold it is even worse.

    Goldman recommended Ashanti take huge hedges against gold, essentially betting gold would fall further, then worked with European bankers to have them stop selling their gold on the market, which caused gold to skyrocket.

    Ashanti held massive losses on its contracts as a result and had to negotiate with its lenders -- through Goldman Sachs -- to not force it to pay out on its contracts. In a horribly weakened state it was eventually sold to Anglo Gold, a deal that was brokered by -- yep, you guessed it! -- Goldman Sachs.

    Each step of the way Goldman was in there getting paid large fees. They are very much able to game the system to their favor so it's often very difficult to bet against them.

    Rich

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2645435, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 10:59:45 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement