A Long-Term Risk for Shale Oil Stocks

A week can hardly pass without hearing about the onshore U.S. oil boom. While there are plenty of reserves to be developed through unconventional means, expectations for long-term shale oil growth may be too high. Some facts seem to indicate future production gains might be more difficult than currently anticipated. If that's the case, investors holding optimistically priced oil and gas producers could be unpleasantly surprised. Don't believe there's a risk? Let's take a look.

Two main hindrances for future shale growth
There are two main headwinds for future shale oil production growth; low well amounts currently delivered and steep depletion rates. A relatively small amount of oil produced per well means that increasing the number of wells has to be a method of replenishing lost production. Rapid oil reservoir depletion, when the production rate of a well drops significantly and quickly, means that additional wells will be needed sooner and more often to maintain delivery levels.

A relationship between three data points is helpful in judging how strong these headwinds might be. Initial well production rates (basically the amount produced on the first day a well comes in), the 30-day rate (average production after 30 days), and the long-term production rate (a figure that is rarely reported but is helpful in estimating depletion). In general, the lower the figures, absolutely and relatively, the tougher it will be to achieve meaningful long-term growth. Three main shale plays provides some relevant information.

A copious oil region: The Eagle Ford
The Eagle Ford shale might be the country's most prolific shale oil play. Located in South Texas, it has been described as a "borderline carbonate reservoir." This means that it is not a typical shale formation but its oil is easier to recover than most. EOG Resources (NYSE: EOG  ) is the major player in the Eagle Ford, discovering it in 2010 and being the largest leaseholder. 

In the latest quarter, EOG reported that, in one region of the Eagle Ford, wells came in with initial production rates ranging from 1,830 to 2,050 barrels of crude oil equivalent per day. In a more fertile area, higher initial rates ranged from 2,990 to 7,515 Boepd. The company also reported that its best well to date, the Burrow Unit #5H, had an average production rate of 4,265 Boepd, or about 57% of its initial rate, after 30 days.

There are a few takeaways from these developments. Though the Eagle Ford is abundant on a shale oil basis, it's not hugely so on an industry basis. For example BP's Macondo well, the one involved in the Gulf of Mexico disaster, was flowing around 50,000 Boepd. EOG's data also indicates that well production can vary tremendously by area. Assuming that producers look to the easiest and most accomplished targets first, that could have future negative production ramifications. Also, though longer depletion rates weren't provided, the 30-day rate at 57% of initial production could be a helpful benchmark. 

Another key shale region: The Bakken
Data from EOG's Bakken projects supplies further shale insight. The Bakken, with drilling mostly located in North Dakota, is one of the most important sources of oil in the United States.

In its most recent quarter, EOG reported Bakken results with initial production between 2,120 and 2,685 Boepd. What's interesting is that these amounts were aided by 160-acre well spacing. To make wells more productive, getting more oil out quicker and cheaper, EOG proposed moving wells from being spaced at 320-acres to a closer spread. While this increases current production, the technique might also deplete reservoirs faster.

Continental Resources (NYSE: CLR  ) , the largest leaseholder and producer in the Bakken, provides additional information. It reported wells recently completed in North Dakota averaged initial one-day tests of 1,150 Boepd, much lower than EOG's performance. This might be due to well placement. The company is only now starting to test 320-acre and 160-acre spacing.

Continental's attempt to drive down costs by the use of multiple well drilling pads increases depletion worries. Pad drilling, basically drilling multiple wells in differing horizontal directions from one rig location, produces more in a shorter time, but it might also exhaust whatever resources are in that location quicker. 

A recent encouraging play: The Spraberry-Wolfcamp
While the Bakken's potential has been known for a while, a more recent hope is the Spraberry-Wolfcamp region, a play in the Permian Basin of West Central Texas.

Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE: PXD  ) is the largest acreage holder in the area and has reported some drilling results. In its latest quarter, new wells had a 24-hour peak initial production rate of between 1,572 and 1,712 Boepd and peak 30-day averages of 1,040 to 1,107 Boepd, or a respectable 65% of initial levels. The company's DL Hutt C #1H well, its best horizontal well so far, had an initial 24-hour peak production rate of 1,693 Boepd and an average peak 30-day rate of 1,402 Boepd or an impressive 83% of the first day.  

Final thoughts
Realizing there have been an awful lot of numbers presented, they do hint at a serious consideration for investors, however. Relatively low and noticeably declining well production could mean that shale oil producers will have to continually find and develop new reserves not just to meet growth expectations but to eventually maintain production levels. Especially when initial wells start to meaningfully deteriorate. While the figures provided aren't necessarily conclusive, they do suggest that longer-term investors might want to at least contemplate potential future growth difficulties before committing to a shale oil stock.

Still a believer in the shale revolution? Here's how to play it
Record oil and natural gas production is revolutionizing the United States' energy position. Finding the right plays while historic amounts of capital expenditures are flooding the industry will pad your investment nest egg. For this reason, the Motley Fool is offering a comprehensive look at three energy companies set to soar during this transformation in the energy industry. To find out which three companies are spreading their wings, check out the special free report, "3 Stocks for the American Energy Bonanza." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 01, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Mittyc wrote:

    An excellent and factual article, at last some truth and reality amidst all the shale hype and misinformation that is flooding the media, most driven by selfish political and short-term financial gain. Attached is what I had posted at another forum on this same subject:

    " The media is awash with all this gushing about "the shale miracle", words like "boom, huge, explosive, excitement”, giving the less-informed out there the impression that shale will save the day and will take care of the world’s impending oil crises with it’s rapidly depleting oil reserves. Being lulled into a false sense of security can be fateful.

    Among the plethora of reports out there, I find the following three to be complete and factual, not driven by any particular vested interest.

    1) EIA Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources, June 2013 2) EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2013 with projections to 2040 3) BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2013 .

    Corresponding links below:

    http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo/pdf/0383(2013).pdf http://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/about-bp/statistical-r...

    The US Shale oil myth: Much hype is being made in this country about shale oil, often misleading and inaccurate. The EIA assessment shows US shale oil peaking to only 2.75 mbd in 2020 and declining thereafter. This includes Eagle Ford, Bakken and Permian Basin, along with the lesser ones. The US needs 18.6 mbd. Peak US oil production in 2012 was only 8.6 mbd, requiring 10.3 mbd in imports. So shale oil is not the hyped “game changer”. And all this hype about the “US being oil independent by 2020 “ is sheer nonsense too. We consumes 18.6 mbd, will produce at a maximum of perhaps 11.4 mbd and hence will have to import the balance 7.5 mbd forever, until the rest of the world too runs dry.

    According to the 2013 EIA assessment, the US has shale oil reserves of 58 billion barrels (BB). This, coupled with conventional oil reserves of 35 BB, give the US a total reserve of 93 BB. With the US daily consumption of 18.6 million barrels a day (mbd), this gives the US an oil life of a meager 13.7 years! So much for the “shale miracle”.

    The corresponding numbers for total world oil are 345 BB shale + 1669 BB conventional, 89.6 mbd consumption rate, resulting in a mere 61 year life span. And this is at the 2012 consumption rate. Growth in the developing world will only degrade this number further.

    Also, in 2012 a mind-boggling 6,000+ shale wells were “horizontally fracked” in order to get to average production rates of only 1.5 mbd. These wells are producing far less than was expected, with yield rates as low as 30%. Big oil is sweating their involvement in shale too. Royal Dutch Shell recently publicly quit the adventure after sustaining huge losses, Exxon and Chevron are smarting too having got involved. Also, shale extraction know-how is a virtual US monopoly now. One doubts whether developing countries have the resources and abundant water supplies to afford the process.

    The Shale gas story: While EIA world shale gas estimates of 7,289 trillion cft (tcf) increases world natural gas reserves from 6,839 to 14,138 tcf, unless the world’s colossal transportation assets and infrastructure are converted to LPG, having all that gas is irrelevant. Transportation is the world’s largest oil hog, consumes more than 80%. Conversely, if all the excess gas were to be converted to oil (GTL), whatever the costs worldwide, the world will get another 782 billion barrels of oil, world oil life will be extended from 61 to 85 years. And then what?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2701406, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/18/2014 3:07:27 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement