Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Foolish Face-Off: Ford vs. GM

Just five years ago, auto giants General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) and Ford (NYSE: F  )  appeared to be on the brink of disaster. It's hard to believe, but in that quick time-frame, the auto industry is roaring again. While GM and Ford have followed a similar formula to recovery, focusing on quality products and healthy balance sheets, which of these large U.S. auto makers has turned the corner for good?

It's time for a Foolish face-off! Here's a side-by-side comparison of these two titans of auto industry. 


When you consider what US auto sales have done in recent years, it's a bit surprising how low the valuations of auto stocks are. Just look at this chart, which shows how much faster auto sales have risen than the valuations of these two stocks. 

US Auto and Other Motor Vehicle Sales Chart

US Auto and Other Motor Vehicle Sales data by YCharts.

It's hard to understand why automakers are so unloved right now. Perhaps it's the stigma of uncertainty, from the auto bailout, or even the exposure that these companies have in Europe. Whatever the reason, we'll want to dig a bit deeper to see if there's still some value to be had. 

Everyone has a different approach to value. I believe that valuation only makes sense if it's relative, and I prefer not to look at price-to-earnings in a vacuum. In my world, a stock with a P/E of 20 that's growing at 30% is cheaper than a P/E of 10 on a 5% grower. 

The reason that I believe in a "relative" approach to value is simple, it's because numbers aren't static.

If a company has a P/E of 10 but its business is in decline, that P/E may soon be 20 or 30. On the other hand, a business with a "higher P/E" that is growing at 30%, can do quickly become a bargain.

Two relative valuation tools, that I prefer, are the price-to-earnings growth ratio (PEG), and the price-to-sales ratio (P/S). 

In terms of relative value, both stocks look dirt cheap, but GM beats out Ford with a rock bottom PEG of 0.64, and a P/S ratio of 0.35. Ford looks good as well with a P/S ratio of 0.46, and a PEG of 0.7, but the winner is GM

Value winner: GM


The average age of all U.S. auto's is 11.4 years, and it's expected to grow 20% by 2018, at some point these vehicles will need to be replaced. This is bullish for the sector overall, but who will capture that growth?

For the moment, Ford seem to be driving ahead of GM. Ford's most recent quarter showed revenue growth of 12%, while GM's revenue only rose 4%.

GM's revenue also stayed relatively flat from 2011 to 2012, and it is on track to rise only between 3-4% this year. While Ford's revenue was also flat the past two years, it is on pace to rise well over 10% this year. Further, Ford's most recent earnings grew by 0.15 cents per share, year over year, and earnings beat estimates by 19% as well. 

Ford's sales growth has really been wide-spread, as their most recent sales numbers showed double-digit growth in all vehicle segments. The greatest growth was in the small vehicle segment, which grew 30%, and with higher fuel efficiency standards coming from the White House, Ford is poised for future growth. 

Ford's has improved quality, and its selection of fuel efficient vehicles, which is driving growth. 

Growth winner: Ford


When you strip away the numbers, and judge a stock by its intangibles, things get really tough. Let's start our auto analysis with the geographic footprint of these businesses.

Europe has been a nightmare for Ford in recent years, and European sales account for 20% of its business. GM European sales are just above 12% per year, which gives it less liability to the troubled economies of Europe. However, in its most recent quarter Ford showed progress in Europe, could this continent be turning the corner? 

Next we take a look at management. Since taking over in 2006, Alan Mulally has reenergized Ford by making some really great, common sense, decisions. 

His most notable successes were:

1. Shedding brands like Volvo and focusing on a smaller number of quality brands and vehicles.

2. Adapting to consumer demands for higher gas mileage vehicles by shedding many SUV's. 

3. Taking on debt in 2006, which allowed Ford to exploit a positive image, by avoiding bail-out funds in 2008.

It would seem that Ford would be a slam-dunk winner in the management category, but it's not that simple. Afterall, Mulally has been a rumored favorite to become Microsoft's new CEO; if he left, Ford's future would be uncertain. 

Further, due in-part to bailout help, GM has an improved balance sheet, and has a significantly reduced cost structure with streamlined brands. The company has done a great job of positioning itself to take on future tailwinds, which seem to be a constant presence in this industry.

This category could be considered a toss-up, but I'm betting that Mulally has instilled a winning culture at Ford that will last beyond his tenure.

Intangibles Winner: Ford (by a nose) 

Foolish Face-Off Winner: Ford

This was a tough face-off, as both of these companies are doing a lot of things well. In the end, with value and growth being split, my decision comes down to my personal view of the intangibles. 

Use this Face-Off as a starting point to do your own homework; ultimately your view of the varibable factors should drive your buying decision. Just remember, the best stock to buy is the one you will feel most comfortable holding through good times and bad. 

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2013, at 1:01 PM, highgrowthcarson wrote:

    Both likely out of business by 2025. EV's, or some other alternative energy transportation are the future and if GM and Ford took fifteen years to adopt fuel injectors, radial tires and rack-and-pinion steering, imagine it will take them twice as long to totally retool for the coming revolution. The Volt is a joke -- I mean who would buy that? Tesla is many years ahead in battery tech and the lead grows each day. Likely young companies no one ever head of will arise to compete -- but Ford and GM are mired in anti-tech bureaucracies that cannot change in time as technology creatively destroys yet another hidebound industry.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2013, at 1:53 PM, picquay wrote:

    This guy is an ass. Telsa is burning up as we speak. Not, just in terms of fire, but also pocket books. They are priced out of the publics reach. If I was a movie star like highgrowthcarson is, I would buy Telsa too. I think his highgrowth stands for something other than a company. Maybee he is smoking some of that highgrowth he's growing.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2013, at 3:02 PM, AmericanFirst wrote:


    I'm sorry, but you can't fairly compare GM with Ford. GM has received over $120B in bailout funding, debt relief, and tax benefits per the gov. restructuring GM Bailout. That's worth approx. 20 years of profit for FOMOCO.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2013, at 3:37 PM, GaryDMN wrote:

    Ford is capitalizing on their relationship with Mazda, who designed most of their successful models. It was a brilliant move and is paying off now.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2013, at 3:55 PM, TheCommonTulip wrote:

    AmericanFirst-You're right, it's an unfair advantage. Yet I personally feel that Ford's brand benefited from skipping the bailout, and they are delivering faster revenue growth than GM now.

    It'll be interesting to see what happens next.

    Thanks for reading, and Fool on!


Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2732581, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/26/2016 10:30:34 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,094.83 -166.62 -0.91%
S&P 500 2,146.10 -18.59 -0.86%
NASD 5,257.49 -48.26 -0.91%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/26/2016 4:00 PM
F $12.01 Down -0.16 -1.31%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GM $31.80 Down -0.32 -1.00%
General Motors CAPS Rating: ***