The U.S. Government Is Punishing Innocent Investors (and Letting Guilty Bankers Go Free)


Image by Hidehiro Kigawa.

Few rational people would argue that closer regulation of the banking industry was uncalled for following the calamity of the last few years. But as things play out, it's become increasingly obvious that innocent shareholders in banks like Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) , and U.S. Bancorp (NYSE: USB  ) are the ones paying the price and not the bankers that caused the crisis in the first place.

The most obvious examples of this are the massive legal fines and expenses that the megabanks have racked up over the last few years. To date, Bank of America has paid $43 billion in fees and expenses related to litigation and settlements, its chief executive officer Brian Moynihan said earlier this week -- the figure for Bank of America in the chart below is based on estimates from The Wall Street Journal. And in the middle of last month, JPMorgan Chase settled a variety of claims for a record $13 billion, the largest fine ever extracted by the government from a single company.

Even more expensive are the increased compliance costs that will haunt the industry going forward. In a presentation on Wednesday, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon told analysts that the nation's largest bank by assets will incur an added $2 billion in expenses related to compliance by 2014. "The $2 billion, for the most part, is permanent," said Dimon. "It's not going to go away."

To be fair, JPMorgan is in a unique position, becoming a favored target of regulators following the 2012 London Whale scandal that eventually cost the bank $6 billion, after being initially dismissed by Dimon as a "tempest in a teapot." But the increased costs of compliance are nevertheless hitting the entire industry.

This was something that Richard Davis, the CEO of U.S. Bancorp, discussed at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Banking and Financial Services Conference last month. In response to an analyst's question about the "top three structural issues that the industry needs to address," Davis called out compliance (emphasis added):

It then used just to be in the conversation, even two years ago I wouldn't have brought it up. But I think compliance is now the watchword for success. All of your performance financially doesn't get credit unless you're compliant, when you're doing things perfectly all the time. And so, we have to invest a fair amount of expenses into doing things right the first time and to accrue the kind of trust you need to have from your regulators to enjoy, I think, what will be a long-term success. And that's an investment curve right now for all of us that I want you to be paying attention to.

The net result is that almost all of the nation's major banks have seen an uptick in their core efficiency ratios, meaning that there's less revenue left over for shareholders at the end of the day. For its part, U.S. Bancorp, a notoriously efficient operation, reported a 200-basis point year-over-year increase in its efficiency ratio in the most recent quarter.

Is this something that bank investors should be concerned about? I think it is, as it'll inevitably drive down shareholder returns. The real question, in turn, is whether they'll be driven down to the point that investors will start avoiding the nation's biggest banks in favor of their smaller, less affected rivals. That, as they say, is to be determined.

Are you looking for a safe bank that's made investors rich?
Many investors are terrified about investing in big banking stocks after the crash, but the sector has one notable stand-out. In a sea of mismanaged and dangerous peers, it rises above as "The Only Big Bank Built to Last." You can uncover the top pick that Warren Buffett loves in The Motley Fool's new report. It's free, so click here to access it now.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2013, at 6:07 PM, duuude1 wrote:

    If investors sell off their shares of bank stocks, since a significant % of executive comp is stock, then who will suffer their just rewards?

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2761452, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2014 4:28:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement