Toxic Toys, Clothes, and Baby Products More Common Than You Might Think

Are you inadvertently poisoning your child? A recent report out of the state of Washington shows how widespread the use of potentially dangerous chemicals in toys and other children's products really is.

Feb 8, 2014 at 7:00AM

We laugh when we see ads like the one below. "How silly people were back then, thinking they could give their kids cocaine for a toothache!" we say to ourselves. The problem is, our kids might look back on us and think the same thing -- only now, we won't be able to feign ignorance. A recent report out of Washington state shows why. 

Screen Shot


Back in 2008, the state of Washington passed a first-of-its-kind law called the Children's Safe Products Act (CSPA). The basic gist of the law was that manufacturers of children's products have to report when a product they offer contains any ingredient on a list of 66 "chemicals of high concern."

That law is just now being phased in at full strength, and on Thursday the Washington Toxics Coalition (WTC) came out with a report detailing what they discovered in reviewing disclosures from the manufacturers.

The results will give parents a lot to think about before buying just about anything for their child.

A breakdown of the findings
Between March and September, WTC found that 78 different manufacturers submitted 4,605 reports of products containing chemicals of high concern. (Though CSPA only pertains to one state, many of the products sold in Washington are the same as those offered in other states.) 

Below are the six broad products the WTC chose to highlight, what chemicals were found, and what the deleterious effects of these chemicals could be.



Scientific Concerns

Children's Tops (shirts)


Endocrine Disruption, Developmental/Reproductive Toxicity

Dolls & Soft Toys

Bisphenol A (BPA)

Developmental/Reproductive Toxicity

Toy Cars/Vehicles

Antimony Trioxide Flame Retardant


Baby Car Seats

TCEP Flame Retardants

Carcinogen, Reproductive Toxicity

Children's Tableware



Personal Care Products


Endocrine Disruption

Source: Washington Toxics Coalition.

Obviously, one run-in with a potentially carcinogenic product is highly unlikely to mean that your child will immediately come down with a form of cancer. In fact, almost no one knows if exposure to these chemicals via clothes, toys, and other children's products is a cause for immediate concern.

But that uncertainty causes fear that, over time, chemicals on the "High Concern" list could increase the chances for cancer, as well as hormonal, developmental, and reproductive defects.

As a parent to a newborn myself, I want to know that what I'm buying for my daughter hasn't been dipped, treated, or sprayed with something that -- over time -- is going to cause unnecessary suffering.

The biggest offenders, and what it means for investors
The WTC also provided a list of the companies that submitted reports for products containing high-concern chemicals. The top 10 include many familiar, publicly traded names.  Because clothing and footwear products accounted for the most reports, it should be no surprise that VF Corporation (NYSE:VFC), the parent company of JanSport, The North Face, and other brands, Gap (NYSE:GPS), Nike (NYSE:NKE), and Fifth & Pacific (NYSE:KATE) -- formerly Liz Claiborne -- were all on the list. 

Joining them were Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) and Target (NYSE:TGT), which also should not be surprising given the sheer volume of products each of these behemoths offer at their stores.

Screen Shot

Source: Washington Toxics Coalition

A knee-jerk reaction would be to condemn all of these companies as evil: profiting by selling harmful products to our children. But such a stance would ignore several important variables at play.

For instance, the companies that sell the most children's products are more likely to have to submit reports for high-concern chemicals. For that reason, we might give a thumbs-up to a company like Target -- which has a wide array of offerings but less than 100 reports of such chemicals -- and question why Triboro Quilt, which has less than 50 employees total, is so high on the list.

Even more important, however, is that the list ignores the fact that many of these companies are just becoming aware of such toxicities right now as well. As WTC states: "Some of the largest reporters may be the companies that are trying to get control of toxic chemical use throughout their supply chain... Many ... are also implementing toxic chemical reduction activities and have adopted toxic chemical restriction lists."

Following the passage of CSPA in 2008, Wal-Mart said it would be working with suppliers to eliminate such chemicals. Gap and VF Corp. also made a statement to the same effect. In 2011, Nike vowed to begin eliminating such chemicals. And just this past October, in response to pressure from the "Mind the Store" campaign, Target adopted a policy for eliminating toxins from its supply chain.

For investors, it's simply too early to tell if any of this could lead to significant changes in the underlying fundamentals of each business.

As concerned parents, beyond simply being more careful when you go shopping, you can peruse the entire list amassed by the Washington State Department of Ecology by clicking here.

Invest in companies where this is never a concern

As I said, its too early to know if information like this could represent a real threat to these companies.  But if you're an investor, you want to build the kind of portfolio where such concerns aren't making you lose sleep.  You want to buy companies you can buy and hold forever. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 

Brian Stoffel has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Nike. The Motley Fool owns shares of Nike. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information