Where Did China's "Missing" 500 Tons of Gold Go?

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over daily movements, we do like to keep an eye on market changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

With the 8:30 a.m. EST release of new Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen's prepared remarks for the House Financial Services Committee, U.S. stocks opened higher on Tuesday; the benchmark S&P 500 and the narrower Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES: ^DJI  )  were up 0.30% and 0.38%, respectively, at 10:15 a.m. EST. Meanwhile, the gold market appeared to be sending a less benevolent signal, as the precious metal hit a three-month high ahead of the release; U.S. gold futures were up for a fifth consecutive day -- the longest streak since August 2012. The most popular gold exchange-traded product, the SPDR Gold Shares (NYSEMKT: GLD  ) , was up 0.6% at 10:15 a.m. EST.

Perhaps Yellen would be relieved to learn that today's rise in the price of gold looks to be unrelated to her appearance before Congress, but rather connected to 500 tons of "missing" Chinese gold -- just the sort of intrigue that excites many gold enthusiasts. Here are the facts:

  • On Monday, the China Gold Association published data indicating gold demand in the nation shot up 41% last year to 1,176 tons, meaning China almost certainly overtook India as the world's largest consumer of the yellow metal.
  • However, last year's net imports of gold through Hong Kong of 1,158 tons (nearly double the amount from 2012) essentially covers the consumption demand from individuals. That leaves unexplained the destination of the 428 tons that were mined domestically -- making China the world's largest producer and consumer -- and the amount of gold imported through Shanghai, which has not yet been published.

The speculation among market participants is that China's central bank, the People's Bank of China (PBOC), hoovered up last year's domestic production. To date, the bank has only said that its gold reserves have remained constant at 1,054 tons since April 2009.

With several pillars of the thesis behind the "long gold" trade having broken down (notably, the risks of hyperinflation and/or financial meltdown), gold bulls are still hanging their hats on the notion that growing demand from developing nations, including from their central banks, will push the metal to new heights. As such, this morning's news, with the possibility of a substantial increase in the PBOC's gold reserves, is just the sort of thing to spark some excitement in the gold market. However, I don't think today's news or the wider prospect of increased demand from developing nations is enough to repair what is a broken trade. Don't buy gold on the rumor -- the yellow metal remains expensive.

Forget gold: Here are nine stocks that pay a rock-solid yield
One of the dirty secrets that few finance professionals will openly admit is the fact that dividend stocks as a group handily outperform their non-dividend paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured that it's true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor's portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2014, at 12:23 PM, rhealth wrote:

    "Don't buy gold on the rumor -- the yellow metal remains expensive."

    Compared to what?

  • Report this Comment On February 11, 2014, at 5:36 PM, TMFAleph1 wrote:

    @rhealth

    Thanks for your question. Gold remains expensive relative to its long-term average price, on an inflation-adjusted basis.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2834045, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/22/2014 3:50:10 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement