Google-comScore Partnership Will Change the Ad Equation

Google  (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) has partnered with comScore (NASDAQ: SCOR  ) to offer advertisers real-time data to measure how effective campaigns are across all types of computer screens and mobile devices. The move brings Google closer to offering the kind of data television companies have offered advertisers, and it should help the online giant compete for ad dollars with TV networks.

The product, comScore Validated Campaign Essentials, will, after a test period, be offered to clients on Google's DoubleClick ad management platform. According to a comScore press release, comScore's vCE metric will be built directly into the DoubleClick ad server that publishers and marketers use to deliver their ads. It will initially be available in the U.S. later this year for desktop-based display and video ads, with plans to expand the service for mobile and cross-platform.

Serge Matta, president of comScore, said that he believes this partnership will bring more digital ad dollars to the table.

"It allows us to radically simplify digital media buying for the industry, while enhancing quality and accountability," he said. "This directly addresses many of the everyday challenges that prevent our clients from investing further in digital."

What does vCE do?

While the comScore press release announcing the deal relies heavily on buzzwords, the reality is that the partnership should give DoubleClick advertisers more effective tools to manage their ad campaigns in real time. The vCE system will put a whole lot of data within one click for advertisers, letting them know who is seeing their ads, what actions they are taking (or not taking), and other useful info.

According to comScore, the service offers "cross-screen comparable audience delivery metrics – such as reach, frequency, and gross rating points [used to measure the size of an audience reached]. This provides clients immediate access to industry-trusted, neutral data that's directly comparable to TV and other traditional media."

"We're deeply committed to creating metrics that are as meaningful for brands as the click is in performance advertising," said Google Vice President of Display Advertising Neal Mohan.

Jed Meyer, research director at Annalect, the analytics arm of Omnicom, said it best when he told the Wall Street Journal that the deal makes Google accountable like traditional media. "If NBC sold you a commercial, you wouldn't just trust NBC that the ad reached a million people," he said.

Will all those buzzwords make Google more money?

According to CNBC, the "total brand advertising market, which includes digital, TV, and more traditional offline ads, is worth at least $300 billion a year." Google, which once competed with other Internet companies for ad dollars, is betting that the comScore deal can help it fight for ads that normally would have gone to television.

"To really crack the nut and bring brand dollars to digital advertising, you have to crack the brand-measurement nut," said Mohan to CNBC. "This integration and partnership with comScore is our bet on real-time audience measurement."

Still, while this deal moves Google close to offering advertisers the kind of data that they get from TV campaigns, it should be noted that a very small amount of companies control most TV ad dollars and those companies do not move quickly.

"Most large brands -- and recall that there are fewer than 200 who account for more than 90% of network TV advertising -- want to optimize their video spending across video-based screens, and TV in its traditional form is not losing its dominance any year soon," Pivotal Research Group analyst Brian Weiser told Forbes.

An equal playing field

For Google, the deal removes a hurdle that it faced when fighting TV networks for ad dollars. Instead of being an Internet company with special Internet metrics, Google is matching TV at its own game.

With the data from this deal, the TV companies can no longer argue to major brands that Google offers something different (they may still argue it, but Google has the ammo to fight back now). It's all about eyeballs and this partnership allows Google to show exactly how many it can deliver -- and perhaps how they react -- in a way that's directly comparable (if not more data rich) than TV.

The next step for you

Want to figure out how to profit on business analysis like this? The key is to learn how to turn business insights into portfolio gold by taking your first steps as an investor. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. In our brand-new special report, "Your Essential Guide to Start Investing Today," The Motley Fool's personal finance experts show you what you need to get started, and even give you access to some stocks to buy first. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 19, 2014, at 2:12 PM, hank321 wrote:

    TV advertising as been losing share to the internet for more than a decade now. This trend is not ending anytime soon. Plus, increasingly, video is not being delivered to screens by traditional television legacy methods,...entertainment video is becoming increasingly a digital play, no longer analog broadcast OR cable.

    Hulu anyone? Netflix, Amazon, Apple, Crackle, there are more non-traditional and growing TV content sources every quarter. Google knows this quite well. And they know that BRAND ad dollars far outweigh the DR ads the net has traditionally catered to. That is the point of this partnership.

    Will it impact Google's bottomline? Sure, but slowly, because Google is so large. Will it impact comScore's bottomline as a faster clip, because it is so much smaller and more leveraged to this particular market? What do you think?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 2841414, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/19/2014 9:02:52 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement