Will This Turn LinkedIn Into Another Facebook?

Previously reserved for the likes of Bill Gates, soon all members of the professional social media site can post content, and that may not be a good thing.

Feb 19, 2014 at 7:00PM

It was just a year ago that professional social networking site LinkedIn (NYSE:LNKD) surpassed a company milestone: Over 200 million users. Fast-forward to today, and LinkedIn boasts a whopping 277 million members. Those numbers don't come near social media king Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) and its 1.23 billion active users, but LinkedIn's member growth in just a year is impressive, especially when you consider its emphasis on professionals.

In an effort to engage its members, and provide additional value, LinkedIn kicked off its "Influencer" service in late 2012, featuring the likes of Bill Gates and Richard Branson. The idea was to give big-hitters like Gates and Branson, among others, a forum to impart their business and professional wisdom to the rest of us. Good idea, and it seems to have caught on, as the number of influencers has jumped to about 500. Now, LinkedIn has decided to open the floodgates, as it were, and let everyone in on its self-publishing content game. And while that sounds good, it also opens the possibility of LinkedIn becoming a little too Facebook-like.

The specs
LinkedIn has worked hard to maintain and grow its brand: A network of professionals supporting and sharing with other professionals. Be it job hunting, endorsements, or the building of like-minded networking groups, LinkedIn has done a nice job of branding itself as the pro's social media destination. The distinction between LinkedIn and Facebook is obvious, and it should be.

The notion of tapping into its members' experience and knowledge, particularly folks like Gates and LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner, with its influencer initiative is working wonders. According to LinkedIn, its influencer posts average 31,000 views, more than 250 likes, and 80 comments: An impressive set of stats. In an effort to build on the success of its influencer program, LinkedIn is opening up the ability to post unique content to about 25,000 people starting Wednesday, with more to follow.

The plan is to give LinkedIn members the chance to gain knowledge and insight by utilizing its most important asset: the experience of its professional user base. Like Facebook, LinkedIn wants to further engage its members, keeping them on the site longer and coming back for more, both of which will drive advertising revenues and, hopefully, increase LinkedIn's Premium Subscription and Talent Solutions sales in the process.

Initially, self-published content will only be viewable to a user's own professional network. If readership of a particular post takes off, LinkedIn will make the content available beyond individual networks. Self-publishers won't receive any compensation for their posts, regardless of whether it "sticks" or not, but it will become a part of a user's bio. For LinkedIn, it would seem self-publishing and expanding on its influencer program is a no-brainer: Free content and more engaged users.

What if?
Unlike Facebook's new Paper app that uses reams of data and pushes out content based on its reader's habits, LinkedIn's plan is to use member-generated content. But how does LinkedIn monitor self-published posts, particularly as the new feature expands across the LinkedIn universe? Unfortunately, there will almost certainly be content that has little to no value for anyone in a network, and others that are simply inappropriate. True, a poor or offensive post isn't likely to make it outside its original network or group, but it's easy to see howl LinkedIn's professional image could suffer.

Along with poorly written or uninteresting posts, there's also branding to consider. LinkedIn is what Facebook isn't: It doesn't include pictures of someone's dinner plate, or stumbling upon a conversation that really should have stayed private. And the distinction from Facebook is something LinkedIn needs to maintain; it's what makes it LinkedIn.

Final Foolish thoughts
As the recent article indicates, I am an unmitigated LinkedIn bull. Weiner and team have done an excellent job in diversifying LinkedIn's revenue streams, and built a brand that matches its objective of being all things professional. With that in mind, it's difficult to see LinkedIn dropping the ball with its self-publishing feature, and becoming too Facebook-like. But as the self-generated content doors fly open, it will be interesting to see if LinkedIn is still LinkedIn a year from now.

More LinkedIn-like growth opportunities
They said it couldn't be done. But David Gardner has proved them wrong time, and time, and time again with stock returns like 926%, 2,239%, and 4,371%. In fact, just recently one of his favorite stocks became a 100-bagger. And he's ready to do it again. You can uncover his scientific approach to crushing the market and his six carefully chosen picks for ultimate growth instantly, because he's making this premium report free for you today. Click here now for access.

Tim Brugger has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Facebook and LinkedIn. The Motley Fool owns shares of Facebook and LinkedIn. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information