With Free Version of Windows, Microsoft Gives In to the Google Way

Microsoft may be testing out a bold new pricing strategy with its flagship Windows operating system.

Mar 5, 2014 at 2:41PM


This article was written by Wired.com -- the leading provider of technology and innovation news.

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) is slowly transforming itself into something that looks a lot like Google (NASDAQ:GOOGL).

It's not just that Microsoft is very much a player in web search, after five years at the helm of Bing. It's not just that the tech giant is betting big on cloud computing with services like Office 365 and Windows Azure. Microsoft, it seems, is also following in the footsteps of Google operating systems such as Android and Chrome OS. Last week, The Verge reported that Redmond is preparing a free version of Windows 8.1, its latest operating system for desktop and laptop PCs.

Google offers free OSes to computer and phone makers as a way of driving the use of its search engine and countless other web services, and now, Microsoft is at least experimenting with the idea of doing much the same thing. According to the report, its free operating system is known as Windows 8.1 With Bing. As the name implies, the OS is meant to feed the use of Microsoft's own search engine, as well as other Microsoft cloud services and software applications.

More from Wired: Inside the New Arms Race to Control Bandwidth on the Battlefield

It's also the surest sign yet that Microsoft realizes it must significantly reduce the price of its Windows OSes in order to compete in the modern world, where free OSes are everywhere. Even Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) now lets you upgrade to the next version of its desktop OS for free. For decades, much of Microsoft's revenue has come from its desktop and mobile operating systems, but it's now willing to give up on at least some of these OS revenues to ensure that its software stays relevant.

Windows 8.1 with Bing is just one example. Other reports indicate that Microsoft will drastically reduce OS licensing prices for low-end laptops and that it's considering free versions of its phone and tablet operating systems as well.

More from Wired: How a Math Genius Hacked OkCupid to Find True Love

This apparent shift in philosophy is certainly the best way for Microsoft to compete for a place on desktops, laptops, phones, and tablets. The question is whether Microsoft is nimble enough to give up at least some of its Windows revenues — which have been so important to its business for so long — and then make up for the drop with ad revenues and subscriptions, the stuff that has long fueled the Google empire but that Microsoft has traditionally been less comfortable with.

Microsoft misses mobile
For anyone who remembers Microsoft at its 1990s zenith, when it ruled over more than 95 percent of personal computing devices and utterly dominated the software business, this new philosophy is nothing less than amazing. Once upon a time, Microsoft collected a hefty tax on nearly every little desktop and laptop computer sold, and its whims could decide the fate of even large PC manufacturers.

But then mobile happened. These days, far more smartphones and tablets are sold than PCs, and relatively few of them run Windows. Instead, they run Apple's iOS or Google's Android, the only two platforms that matter on mobile. Obsessed with the importance of its era-defining desktop operating system, Microsoft lost the battle to run the little computers of the future — almost before the fighting was under way.

More from Wired: Steve Wozniak: Apple Should Make an Android Phone

Eventually, Microsoft came up with a nifty — and even influential — mobile operating system, but it was too late. The problem for Microsoft wasn't merely that Apple and Google ruled most smartphones and tablets, but that their mobile OSes were free, subsidized by hardware sales in Apple's case and by advertising in Google's case.

But Microsoft was still so dependent on operating system sales for revenues. OS sales were once nearly half of its revenue, and though, by 2012, they only accounted for a quarter, old habits have died hard. Microsoft was so determined to force people onto paid versions of Windows, it seems, the company would often go to extreme lengths to boost their appeal without removing the price tag. According to reports, former CEO Steve Ballmer was so obsessed with shoring up Windows that he originally planned to delay the iPad version of Microsoft's hugely profitable Office software suite until the Windows tablet version was ready.

More from Wired: How to Use Your Google Maps — Offline

The good news is this obsession with Windows profits seems to be over. Microsoft's new CEO Satya Nadella is someone willing to move away from pure software sales — at least in part — and toward online services. This is what he did as the head of the company's cloud and enterprise division. The division still sells software into massive data centers — and lots of it — but it has shifted much of its business onto Windows Azure, changing everything from the way it pulls in revenues to the way its sales staff operates. Now, he must try to strike a similar balance with client machines.

Presumably, in giving away its Windows desktop OS, Microsoft will push users not only toward Bing but also Office, Office365, and an online storage system known as OneDrive — just as Google gives away its Chrome OS operating system but charges businesses to use its Google Apps office suite and Google Drive storage system. One difference: Microsoft is still concerned with selling software applications that run directly on your computer as well as offering online services, whereas Google is completely committed to the cloud. But the more important issue may be that Microsoft must further shift the way it makes money. Google is used to driving revenues with free operating systems. Microsoft is not. But at least the company knows it needs to change.

Written by Ryan Tate at Wired.com.

More advice from The Motley Fool

Let's face it, every investor wants to get in on revolutionary ideas before they hit it big. Like buying PC-maker Dell in the late 1980s, before the consumer computing boom. Or purchasing stock in e-commerce pioneer Amazon.com in the late 1990s, when it was nothing more than an upstart online bookstore. The problem is, most investors don't understand the key to investing in hyper-growth markets. The real trick is to find a small-cap "pure-play" and then watch as it grows in EXPLOSIVE lockstep with its industry. Our expert team of equity analysts has identified one stock that's poised to produce rocket-ship returns with the next $14.4 TRILLION industry. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening report.

The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Google. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information