Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Is the Music Industry Recovering? Maybe if Your Name’s Justin Timberlake

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

The decline of the music business over the past 15 years has been well documented. First there were the illegal downloads that freaked out major labels (back when there were more than three major labels to freak out). Then Napster went the way of Better Than Ezra, and Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL  ) ushered in the era of legal downloads. Fast forward to 2013, when download sales decreased for the first time as streaming became the latest trend—and a very crowded marketplace with Apple and possibly joining Google (NASDAQ: GOOGL  ) , Spotify, Beats, Pandora (NYSE: P  ) , and others.

According to a new report from MIDiA Consulting's Mark Mulligan, artist income from recorded music was $2.8 billion in 2013, up slightly from 2012, and artists' share of total income has grown from 14% in 2000 to 17% in 2013. Sounds like encouraging news for musicians, right? Maybe for those named Justin Timberlake, Jay-Z, and Blake Shelton. As the report, The Death of the Long Tail, explains, the top 1% of artists account for 77% of income related to recordings.

So much music, so little space

For years, we've been hearing about how the Internet would create a level playing field. Artists would be free of the shackles of major labels and could gain not only creative freedom by releasing their own music, but also control over marketing, distribution and, best of all, royalties.

So, how did digital music services actually contribute to the "superstar economy" trend they were supposed to kill?

"The democratization of access to music distribution has delivered great benefits for artists but has contributed to even greater confusion for fans," Mulligan writes in the report. In other words, there's more music out there but finding it is another story.

"The problem lies not with digital's catalogue expanse – which we have already seen can actually hinder discovery," he continues, "but the small amounts of visual display space digital services have. A digital store or service has a home page that often has to squeeze onto a few square inches of smartphone screen, while a high street store has dozens of square feet of window space and then hundreds of square feet of front-of-store display space through the doors."

The long tail was a tall tale

The idea behind the long tail theory was that consumers would engage with niche content across digital services because of ease of access and discovery tools. Whether or not it ever happened for music is open to debate.

"The long tail never really existed," says Will Simon, general manager for Michael Hausman Artist Management and Aimee Mann's SuperEgo Records. "If it did, why did Tower Records and all the chains go down in flames? Even in the CD heyday, the bulk of the industry revenue was driven by a handful of multi-Platinum artists. Now there are fewer multi-Platinum artists. And the music gatekeepers are more fragmented; there's no MTV and very little national marketing, so very few artists reach critical mass."

Independents swim upstream

As streaming services increase their share of the overall market, their royalty payments have come under scrutiny from artists and record labels.

Spotify said it paid out about $500 million in royalties in 2013, according to numbers it released in December. The company likes to focus on that big number instead of how it breaks down: .6 to .84 cents every time a song is played. It doesn't pay a set amount per stream, but uses a more complicated formula based on what percentage of Spotify's total monthly streams an artist represents.

The company cites an example of a "global hit album" earning $425,000 in a month, but that's for a top seller. A mid-level artist could do tens of thousands of streams in a month and maybe see a few hundred bucks for it. Mulligan's report notes that some independent artists do crack that 1%, but it's not easy.

No danger for major labels

The numbers tell different stories here: the rise of streaming and increase in total artist income sound like music to musicians' ears. But if they're not in the 1%, they may be singing the blues the next time they open their royalty checks.

On the other hand, the major labels, Universal Music Group, Sony (NYSE: SNE  ) and Warner Music Group, don't appear to be in danger of losing their market share as downloads decrease and more users turn to streaming.

The next step for you
Want to profit on business analysis like this? The key for your future is to turn business insights into portfolio gold through smart and steady investing … starting right now. Those who wait on the sidelines are missing out on huge gains and putting their financial futures in jeopardy. The Motley Fool is offering a new special report, an essential guide to investing, which includes access to top stocks to buy now. Click here to get your copy today -- it's absolutely free.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 11, 2014, at 4:18 AM, Interventizio wrote:

    Yes. The internet has dramatically improved accessibility, but has also hindered visibility: everybody can access distribution, but only a few will be noticed.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2869415, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/29/2015 5:14:47 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Jeff Colchamiro

Today's Market

updated 19 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
AAPL $113.29 Up +0.37 +0.33%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
GOOGL $659.69 Down -8.27 -1.24%
Google (A shares) CAPS Rating: ****
P $18.10 Up +0.61 +3.49%
Pandora Media CAPS Rating: *
SNE $25.87 Up +0.01 +0.04%
Sony Corp (ADR) CAPS Rating: **