Does General Electric Company Have an "Outsider" CEO?

At The Motley Fool, we take an unconventional approach to evaluating stocks. While "professional" analysts are dissecting quarterly profit margins, we're digging into intangible leadership qualities that can allow us to crush Wall Street in the long run.

These are things we can do that Wall Street often can't. And Will Thorndike, a private equity manager with a long-term perspective, believes it gives us a crucial advantage.

Thorndike wrote a groundbreaking book on this very topic recently called The Outsiders: Eight Unconventional CEOs and Their Radically Rational Blueprint for Success. The book identifies outlier CEOs that dominated their industry and beat the market at-large for decades on end. Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner recently sat down with Thorndike to talk about the traits of extraordinary CEOs. You can watch and read their fascinating discussion at your leisure.

You can also apply Thorndike's insights to companies in your portfolio. Since I found General Electric to be a highly relevant test case, I decided to dissect GE's CEO Jeff Immelt on three traits of an "outsider" executive. Here is what I found.

GE CEO Jeff Immelt. Source: General Electric.

1. Outsider CEOs outperform their peer group dramatically over their tenure.
Thorndike's research shows that the "outsider" CEOs operate unconventionally in their industry. In the face of adversity, these leaders remain calm and collected, which allows them to beat their peers -- dramatically, in fact -- on a level playing field.

For Jeff Immelt and GE, adversity struck almost immediately after he assumed the role of CEO on Sept. 7, 2001. It was less than a week before 9/11, a tumultuous period for any company in America. Legendary CEO Jack Welch was on the way out, and Immelt had huge shoes to fill.

Despite the challenge, this period provided a lesson that would serve him well over the decade to come: The world is unpredictable, and we live in what he refers to as a "new normal" era of volatility. With this in mind, let's look at how GE performed relative to its competitors.

Instead of using a broad index for comparison, I isolated five industrial companies I believe measure up well against GE in terms of business lines, size, and markets served. These American companies include 3M, Danaher, United Technologies, and Honeywell. I also included Germany's Siemens since it is truly GE's European counterpart. Here are the total stock returns for all six from 2001 to the present day:

GE 1 Year Total Returns Chart

GE 1 Year Total Returns data by YCharts

As you can see, GE has underperformed its closest peers over roughly a dozen years, even including dividends. Quite improbably, however, these stocks moved in a near lockstep over this timeframe. Not a single company really broke away from the pack, which I found surprising even given their "bellwether" status.

In this context, Immelt does not measure up as an "outsider" CEO, but then again neither do his rival executives. It's an interesting timeframe given the start date around 9/11, but still well beyond Thorndike's rule-of-thumb that allows for 2 to 3 years for at the helm for a new CEO.

2. Outsider CEOs are phenomenal at managing cash.
CEOs are known for running businesses, specifically for being excellent operators and innovators. Less often, however, are they lauded for managing shareholder capital in the most optimal manner. But, from Thorndike's perspective, cash management is frequently a key indicator of success.

I believe we ignore this category because it carries less cachet than the aforementioned areas and because, frankly, it's difficult. Regarding the latter, I can't line up several similar companies and compare apples-to-apples how one CEO did relative to another in terms of cash management. It's situation-specific. Further, there are five distinct methods a leader can use to deploy cash or capital, and all these levers mean it's a complicated analysis to undertake.

For our purposes, I'll list the five levers a CEO can pull and provide commentary on GE's above-par or below-par strategy relative to Thorndike's conclusions.

You can use capital at a company to do the following:

  • Make acquisitions: Thorndike says great leaders strike quickly when opportunity arises and they don't spread their bets too thin. In this context, Immelt has executed in an "outsider" fashion. At GE, he makes "bolt-on" acquisitions that are highly relevant to core businesses (unlike the days of old with NBC) and the timing is compelling: GE invested $11 billion in a six-month energy-related buying spree to take advantage of 2011's depressed prices.
  • Pay dividends: Immelt's dividend strategy falls short of Thorndike's ideal, which states that great leaders use dividends as a last resort. GE's 2012 annual report states the following: "[W]e are committed to allocating capital in a balanced and disciplined way, but with a clear priority for dividend growth." GE doesn't stray too far from the pack here, and perhaps that's due to its long history of dividend payouts.
  • Buy back shares: Like the acquisition strategy, Thorndike says buybacks should be conducted when opportunities present themselves, not in a cookie-cutter fashion. GE's completed periodic buybacks, but also tends to strike while the iron's hot and the coffer is full.
  • Pay down debt: Thorndike emphasizes flexibility regarding debt. CEOs should look for opportunities that bolster the company's return on capital, and I've pointed out that GE's financial position has improved tremendously since the financial crisis. Yes, that period was a near-disaster, but Immelt's come a long way with GE and GE Capital.
  • Invest internally in operations: Similar to debt, companies are looking to maximize their returns on capital. Sometimes internal projects offer the most attractive opportunity. Sometimes they don't. GE's investments in everything from natural gas to 3-D printing to the industrial Internet -- all of which are fast-growing concepts -- indicates that the company's placing the right long-term bets.

3. Outsider CEOs are relentlessly focused yet run decentralized operations.
Thorndike points out that the best leaders in his studies had a couple of operational commonalities: They focused on their strengths to dominate those markets and they ran decentralized operations without layers of bureaucracy. With regard to GE, I've outlined my thoughts on the company's strategy to build a lean management approach that resembles a start-up here. In this category, I believe Immelt's pushing GE in the right direction and operating like an "outsider."

Foolish takeaway
To evaluate a true "outsider" CEO I believe there are three key indicators, and that Jeff Immelt's report card would look something like this:

  • Stock outperformance relative to peers: C
  • Exceptional cash management: B
  • Fine-tuned operational strategy: A

As of now, it's hard to argue GE's stock performance has been anything but subpar since Immelt took the helm. That's the criticism most often lobbed in his direction, which ignores the other two categories.

Source: Flickr/Jeffrey Turner.

Interestingly, I found one of Immelt's interview comments highly relevant to GE's decade-long predicament. As he is prone to point out, "Never confuse tailwind with good management."

I would say the reverse -- never confuse headwind with bad management -- would also hold true. And in some respects, Immelt's been dealt a tough hand as he pivots GE away from the financial shenanigans of years past. Perhaps, as the winds change course, GE will have some upside down the road.

9 rock-solid dividend stocks you can buy today
One of the dirty secrets that few finance professionals will openly admit is the fact that dividend stocks as a group handily outperform their non-dividend paying brethren. The reasons for this are too numerous to list here, but you can rest assured that it’s true. However, knowing this is only half the battle. The other half is identifying which dividend stocks in particular are the best. With this in mind, our top analysts put together a free list of nine high-yielding stocks that should be in every income investor’s portfolio. To learn the identity of these stocks instantly and for free, all you have to do is click here now.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 23, 2014, at 11:55 PM, SeriousCash wrote:

    Respectfully, you mention:

    "Not a single company really broke away from the pack, which I found surprising even given their "bellwether" status. "

    With a variation of ~12percent for one company vs ~29 percent for the other 4, well...thats about a 100plus percent difference in total return. Is that not breaking away....one from the others?

    Rescaling the comparison chart would provide a better gauge. IMO.

    Thanks for the insight however.

  • Report this Comment On March 24, 2014, at 8:20 AM, tessa8940 wrote:

    Mr. Immelt's track record speaks for itself. Stock price when he took the helm was in the $40 range. Plummeted to $5 and now is in the $20's. In addition, the divided is less than half when he started. If the board was doing there job, he would have been replaced years ago.

  • Report this Comment On March 24, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Peritectic wrote:

    Wow..I never see someone use innovative mathematics to justify an underperforming. I think you need to disclose who paid you for this post? Smells of CYTR?

  • Report this Comment On March 25, 2014, at 9:28 AM, TMFBoomer wrote:

    Thanks for the comments.

    @SeriousCash

    I see your point. I think the chart could better illustrate the varying performances if it was rescaled, and you would see some breakaway performances from 3M and a few others more clearly.

    Since it's not critical to the argument here (that GE underperformed its peers) I'll leave chart as is but update the wording.

    Point taken and more appropriate chart to be used in the future.

    Isaac

    @TMFBoomer

  • Report this Comment On April 01, 2014, at 5:55 PM, jodinajoseph wrote:

    There is so much pessimism about GE lashing the herd that I am awestruck how healthy it is property its location. The circumstance is GE is dedicated to do what they do best. For those complete to donarm crowds and tramp to Jeff's entrance with a noose, I propose you appearance at the marketplaces in which GE's knowledge stretches it a commanding benefit in construction new substructure from abrasion as well as promotion and swapping what is damaged out. The cause / effect discussion will only disclose who is willing to argue - not which technique the stock is moneymaking. GE is moving in the right bearing - and down is not it.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2886547, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/1/2014 10:55:04 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement