After a Terrible Quarter, Is Tiffany a Sell?

In spite of Tiffany's poor quarterly financial results, shares declined just 0.5%. Does this signal that the company is an attractive opportunity, or should the Foolish investor consider Signet Jewelers instead?

Mar 25, 2014 at 8:45AM


Source: © BrokenSphere / Wikimedia Commons.

On March 21, shares of Tiffany (NYSE:TIF) fell 0.5% after the company released financial results for the fourth quarter of its 2013 fiscal year. In and of itself, this decline in share price wasn't particularly special. Rather, it's how well Tiffany's share price held up after results that should intrigue investors.

So, how exactly did the company perform, and what does this mean for the Foolish investor moving forward? Is the jeweler an attractive prospect in spite of earnings, or should investors consider Signet Jewelers (NYSE:SIG) instead?

Tiffany fell short on both the top and bottom lines
For the quarter, Tiffany reported revenue of $1.3 billion. Although this is 5% higher than the $1.24 billion management reported a year earlier, it fell shy of the $1.31 billion analysts hoped to see. In its report, management attributed the rise in revenue to a 2% increase in comparable-store sales, led by growth in the Americas and Europe while being negatively affected by an 11% drop in comparable-store sales in Japan.

Another contributor to the company's performance was a 5% rise in the number of stores in operation. Over the past year, the business increased its store count from 275 to 289. Most of this growth took place in the Americas and Asia-Pacific, while store count dropped in Japan and saw a modest uptick in Europe.

In terms of profits, Tiffany did even worse. For the quarter, the company saw its earnings per share come in at negative $0.81. To put this in perspective, this represents a significant decline compared to the $1.40 per share the company reported a year earlier and was a world apart from the $1.52 per share analysts thought the company would earn.

As bad as this may seem, the shortfall stemmed from an arbitration the company lost against Swatch that cost it $473 million on a pre-tax basis. After adjusting for this one-time expense, earnings per share rose 5% to $1.47, keeping in line with the company's sales growth.

How does Tiffany compare to Signet?
To understand how attractive Tiffany is, it's imperative to get a greater glimpse into its operating history to learn how it fares when pitted against rivals like Signet Jewelers. Only then can we fully comprehend the direction the business is taking and determine whether or not it offers investors a good opportunity.

 CompanyRevenue GrowthNet Income Growth
Tiffany & Company 40% 57%
Signet Jewelers 22% 129%

Source: Tiffany and Signet Jewelers.

Over the past four years, Tiffany has seen some tremendous growth. Between 2009 and 2012, revenue rose an impressive 40%, from $2.7 billion to $3.8 billion. This is far better than Signet's performance. Over the same period, Signet saw its top line grow 22%, from $3.3 billion to $4 billion.

In terms of profits, Tiffany and Signet reversed roles during this time frame. Between 2009 and 2012, Signet's net income rose an impressive 129%, from $157.1 million to $359.9 million. This is far greater than the 57% jump from $264.8 million to $416.2 million reported by Tiffany; it was driven largely by the company's interest income that came from its in-house customer-finance programs.

Foolish takeaway
Based on the data provided, it looks as though Tiffany's quarterly performance was bad, but not as bad as it appeared initially. For this reason alone, shareholders should not rush for the exits in a panic, but they should be mindful that Signet is giving the company a run for its money.

Admittedly, Signet's revenue growth has been mediocre when compared with Tiffany's, but it has made up for this with the significant increase it enjoyed in profitability. Moving forward, the company could become even more attractive as it completes its acquisition of Zale (UNKNOWN:ZLC.DL).

Aside from adding $1.9 billion in revenue to its income statement (which is up 17% from the $1.6 billion the business saw four years earlier), the deal has some additional benefits. Over the past four years, Zale's financial performance has been poor in spite of its revenue growth, with the company generating an aggregate net loss of $223.3 million.

However, with the company turning a profit of $10 million in 2013, Signet believes the $693 million acquisition will allow it to continue growing. Whether or not this expectation will come to fruition has yet to be seen. But if Signet can turn Zale toward profitability and if its core business growth can continue, it may be a more attractive prospect than Tiffany.

Is Tiffany set to be No. 1?
In spite of Tiffany's quarterly earnings, investors appear to be cautiously optimistic about the company's outlook. Does this mean that Tiffany could soar and be the No. 1 stock to own for 2014, or should the Foolish investor look elsewhere for the best of the best?

There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Daniel Jones has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information

Compare Brokers