According to multiple sources, the nation's second largest bank by assets is in talks with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to settle charges that it deceived customers into paying for credit protection services as a part of the credit card application process.
While the deal appears to be nearing completion, it's been in the works for some time. Bloomberg News reported last November that the two parties had begun negotiations. Additionally, it's the fifth such settlement reached with a major bank by the CFPB related to the practice.
Essentially all of the major credit card issuers have ceased the practice over the last few years. Both Capital One (NYSE:COF) and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) led the way, stopping new enrollments in 2012 -- the former after entering into the first of such deals with the CFPB in July of that year.
In Bank of America's case, a final agreement would represent an added chapter to a private settlement it reached in July 2012. In that case, the bank agreed to reimburse affected card-credit customers between $50 and $100 depending on the specific circumstances. All told, it was expected to cost Bank of America $20 million -- click here to see a full list of Bank of America's legal settlements since 2008.
With the benefit of hindsight, that figure seems reasonable if not downright deficient. Media reports peg the current settlement at $800 million, which would amount to the largest yet from a credit card issuer in the CFPB's campaign to reign in the abusive practice.
For shareholders in Bank of America, this adds to a $9.5 billion deal announced last week between the bank and the Federal Housing Finance Agency. That case concerned claims that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac suffered losses from toxic mortgage-backed securities purchased from Bank of America subsidiaries -- namely, Countrywide Financial.
With this in mind, it would be ridiculous to claim that $800 million doesn't matter. That's a lot of money for any bank, including Bank of America.
At the same time, however, the sooner these issues are addressed by Bank of America, the sooner it can put all of its past abhorrent practices behind it. And it's at that point that shareholders can truly expect to see a new trajectory for both earnings and the amount of capital flowing their way via higher dividends and bigger share buybacks.
Big banking's little $20.8 trillion secret
There's a brand-new company that's revolutionizing banking, and is poised to kill the hated traditional brick-and-mortar banks. That's bad for them, but great for investors. And amazingly, despite its rapid growth, this company is still flying under Wall Street's radar. To learn about about this company, click here to access our new special free report.
John Maxfield owns shares of Bank of America. The Motley Fool recommends Bank of America and owns shares of Bank of America, Capital One Financial, and JPMorgan Chase. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.