Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Wal-Mart Ups Its Potential

Wal-Mart Stores  (NYSE: WMT  )  constantly finds itself in the news. This should come as no surprise given the fact that Wal-Mart is the largest retailer in the world. However, as the largest retailer in the world, it has a target on its back. While Target  (NYSE: TGT  )  and  (NASDAQ: AMZN  )  are consistently trying to steal share from Wal-Mart, only Amazon is seeing progress.

For Wal-Mart to keep Amazon off its back, it must constantly innovate. Wal-Mart must focus on innovations that are likely to improve the consumer shopping experience. One recently announced initiative should help in this regard while also aiding the top and bottom lines. 

Empty shelves
Currently, you can find many online articles related to Wal-Mart intending aiming to improve its in-store merchandising, which Wal-Mart sees as a $3 billion opportunity. This is both good news and bad news.

It's bad news because this proves that customers have been disappointed with what Wal-Mart has had to offer. Its means those customers are likely to try another retailer to find what they need. It's good news because there is room for improvement. In essence, Wal-Mart has discovered an area where it's failing, but that area presents tremendous revenue potential. It should be an easy fix, right? Not necessarily. 

The solution is a potential problem

As you might have already heard, Wal-Mart is seeing slower foot traffic. This is due to the headwinds that low-income consumers now face, including the end of the payroll tax holiday and a reduction in food stamp benefits. These are also some reasons why many low-income consumers are frequenting dollar stores. Wal-Mart is fighting back against the dollar stores with its small-box stores, opening between 270 and 300 Neighborhood Market and Walmart Express stores this year. However, that's a story for another time.

The point here is that Wal-Mart is struggling on the top line. Therefore, it must deliver on the bottom line in order to please investors. In order to do this, it must cut costs, or at least prevent costs from increasing. Wal-Mart has focused on headcount to cut costs. For instance, in 2008 there were 1.6 million Americans working at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club. Today, there are 1.4 million Americans working at Wal-Mart and Sam's Club. The catch? Wal-Mart has added 650 locations over that time frame.

That being the case, those who work at Wal-Mart are now being stretched thin, which isn't likely to lead to happy employees and quality customer service. On the other hand, it's possible that this is overstated and that Wal-Mart really did have too many workers several years ago.

If Wal-Mart has an opportunity to potentially add $3 billion to the top line (by filling shelves quicker with high-demand merchandise), then all would seem well, right?  

Efficient or not?
Wal-Mart has always been efficient. For example, over the past five years, its top line outpaced its selling, general, and administrative expenses: 18% growth versus 17.4%. However, take a look at the past year:

WMT Revenue (TTM) Chart

Wal-Mart revenue (trailing-12 months) data by YCharts

Moving forward, if Wal-Mart can significantly reduce its inventory, then costs should decline at a rapid rate, which would put smiles on the faces of investors. You might think that Target was also highly efficient prior to the data breach, but the five-year chart below tells a different story:

TGT Revenue (TTM) Chart

Target revenue (trailing-12 months) data by YCharts

The data breach only worsened an already challenging situation. Target is now facing severe headwinds with data breach costs still in play. But what about Amazon?

AMZN Revenue (TTM) Chart

Amazon revenue (trailing-12 months) data by YCharts

This might be surprising to some people given Amazon's enormous popularity with consumers and investors. But while Amazon's top-line growth is phenomenal, it lags Wal-Mart in the efficiency department. That being the case, while investors looking for high-growth potential will favor Amazon, those looking for safety and efficiency, which often leads to increased capital returns to shareholders, will still favor Wal-Mart.

The Foolish bottom line
Wal-Mart is no longer a growth company, but it still finds innovative ways to grow. The opening of more small-box stores is one example. Another is to improve in-store merchandising.

If Wal-Mart is correct, then adding $3 billion in a fiscal year would equal approximately a 0.6% contribution to the top line. That might not sound like much, but Wal-Mart's revenue has only increased 1.4% over the trailing-12 month period. Also consider cost reductions due to less inventory over the long haul, assuming Wal-Mart sticks with this plan.

Overall, this sounds like a positive plan with more upside potential than downside risk. Please do your own research prior to making any investment decisions. And if you're looking for much greater growth potential than Wal-Mart, then you need to read about The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014.

Boost your 2014 returns with The Motley Fool's top stock
There's a huge difference between a good stock and a stock that can make you rich. The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for 2014, and it's one of those stocks that could make you rich. You can find out which stock it is in the special free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2014." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 06, 2014, at 2:00 PM, madmilker wrote:

    Retail makes only moves a countries currency.

    Whether Amazon or Wal*Mart....

    They move currency...

    and accumulate debt....

    America wasn't built on Retail...

    and it will never build MORE America...

    when its currency is going to foreigners....

    1975 the last year America had a trade surplus....

    Wal*Mart's Global Procurement Office wasn't in China in 1975 like it is now...

    and Jeff Bezos incorporated "Cadabra" in July 1994....

    and the site went online as in 1995....

    Jeff Bezos was eleven years old in 1975....

    You young Americans had better wake your butt up...

    and soon...

    because it's all in that one paragraph Lance Winslow wrote in that article years ago...

    [...."Now let us look at Wal-Mart again; you buy a product there, 6% goes to the employees, 10-18% is profit to the company, 25% goes to other costs and 50% goes to re-stock or the cost of goods sold. Of the 50% about 20-25% goes to China, a guess, but you get the point. Now then, how long will it take at 433 Billion dollars at year for China to have all of our money, leaving no money flow for us to circulate? At a 17 Trillion dollar economy less than 40-years minus the 1/6 they buy from us. Some say that if we keep putting money into our economy, it would take

    forever, but if we do not then eventually all the money flow will go. If China buys our debt then eventually they own us, no need to worry about a war, they are buying America, due in part to our own mismanaged trade, so whose fault is that? Not necessarily China, as they are doing what's in the best interests, and we should make sure that trade is not only free, but fair too."......]


    duh..!!! 40 years....

    because in 1975 the TOTAL US Government DEBT...a mere $533 billion.

    and that "private bank" will tell the US Treasury someday to stop using ten tons of ink a day in the printing of MORE and MORE debt...


    January 9, 1975, interest rate 10.25%

    Think about what is coming because Retail makes NOTHING...

    and the US Government is drowning in over $17 trillion of debt...


Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2904518, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/31/2015 1:04:46 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Dan Moskowitz

Dan Moskowitz spends the majority of his time researching stocks. He believes that fundamentals, and logic pertaining to industry trends, win out over the long haul.

Today's Market

updated 2 days ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,643.01 -11.76 -0.07%
S&P 500 1,988.87 1.21 0.06%
NASD 4,828.33 15.62 0.32%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

8/28/2015 4:00 PM
AMZN $518.01 Down -0.36 -0.07% CAPS Rating: ***
TGT $78.03 Up +0.18 +0.23%
Target CAPS Rating: ****
WMT $64.94 Down -1.14 -1.73%
Wal-Mart Stores CAPS Rating: ***