What Does the Crisis In Ukraine Have to Do With Mortgage Rates in America?

Believe it or not, mortgage rates will almost certainly decline if Russia chooses to invade Ukraine.

Apr 15, 2014 at 6:41PM

Russian military vehicles on parade in 2010. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Earlier this week, I came across the following headline: "Mortgage Rates Hold Ground After Ukraine Headlines."

The point of the piece, as the title suggests, was to highlight the paradox that mortgage rates hardly moved today despite reports that Russian troops had crossed the border into Ukraine.

To mortgage professionals and bond traders, this makes sense. Of course mortgage rates would head lower if Russian tanks rolled across the border with Ukraine!

But is it really so obvious? I mean, think about it. Why are mortgage rates tied to otherwise irrelevant geopolitical positioning in Eastern Europe? More specifically, what serves as the transmission device to connect them?

The answer to this requires that we weave together three different things.

First, mortgage rates aren't set by banks; they're set in the bond market -- or, more formally, the market for fixed-income securities.

As you may recall from the financial crisis, once a mortgage is underwritten, it's typically packaged with other home loans into a "mortgage-backed security," which is then sold to institutional investors like insurance companies, pension funds, and university endowments.


Moreover, because almost all newly issued mortgage-backed securities these days are insured by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac -- in industry lexicon, these are known as "agency" securities -- they carry the same risk as a bond issued by the federal government itself.

In other words, if you have a lot of money to invest but don't want to risk the principal, then an agency mortgage-backed security is a great vehicle to consider.

This brings us to the second thing. In the face of unrest -- be it economic, political, environmental, military, or whatever -- investors have a tendency to abandon risky assets in favor of safe ones.

And what's safer than an agency MBS? Answer: nothing. As a result, when events cause investors to get nervous, they substitute out of things like equities, causing stock prices to fall, and into Treasury bonds and agency MBSes, causing their prices to rise.

We've now arrived at the third and final piece to this puzzle -- that is, the relationship between the price of fixed-income securities like agency MBSes and their yield or interest rate.

Although it seems counterintuitive at first, the price of a fixed-income security and its yield is inversely related. Dig a little deeper, however, and this makes sense. If a $100 bond pays $2 a year in interest, its yield is 2% ($2/$100). But if investors bid the price of that bond up to $150, its yield drops to 1.33% ($2/$150).

And don't forget that the interest rate an MBS pays relates back to the actual mortgages contained therein.

So, to tie everything together: Mortgage rates are set by the price, and thus yield, of mortgage-backed securities. The price of mortgage-backed securities, and particularly those issued by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, is a function of market risk -- the higher the risk, the higher the price.

Consequently, because a Russian invasion of Ukraine would be perceived by market participants to increase risk, it would drive the price of mortgage-backed securities higher. And because these prices are inversely correlated to yield, it follows that the interest rate on new mortgages would move lower.

Make sense? I'll be the first to admit, this isn't obvious from the outset. Yet at the same time, while Wall Street may prefer that you think otherwise, this is far from rocket science.

3 stocks to own for the rest of your life
As every savvy investor knows, Warren Buffett didn't make billions by betting on half-baked stocks. He isolated his best few ideas, bet big, and rode them to riches, hardly ever selling. You deserve the same. That's why our CEO, legendary investor Tom Gardner, has permitted us to reveal The Motley Fool's 3 Stocks to Own Forever. These picks are free today! Just click here now to uncover the three companies we love. 

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information