The Telecom Industry Is Changing: Play or Stay Away?

Despite four players in the industry, two are dominating, and the Federal Communications Commission wants to change that. The FCC is looking to auction bandwidth, which could turn the entire industry upside down.

Apr 28, 2014 at 9:00PM

The U.S. telecom industry is dominated by two major players, Verizon (NYSE:VZ) and AT&T (NYSE:T). Both of these companies have more than 100 million subscribers each and are followed by two comparatively smaller players, namely T-Mobile (NASDAQ:TMUS) and Sprint (NYSE:S), which have around 35 million and 40 million subscribers, respectively. The big players have a hold on the market because of their differentiated coverage and network reliability. As the telecom industry is in the maturity stage of the business life cycle, differentiation or price cuts are the only ways to stay competitive.

T-Mobile's aggressive price reduction/un-carrier strategy enabled the company to make net additions to its subscriber base in 2013. This resulted in price wars, as AT&T and Sprint also had to cut prices, but neither player has been able to match T-Mobile's prices to date. Looking at the market more closely, Verizon and AT&T hold a major chunk of the low-band 700MHz spectrum, which has facilitated their dominance of the telecom industry.

Low-band spectrum share will continue to be a key success factor for telecom companies in the future, and spectrum auctions will change the competitive scenario of the industry.

The low-band advantage
According to several white papers, propagation loss of radio waves increases with frequency, meaning that waves in low bands will travel farther due to less propagation loss.


Source: ZTE

Propagation loss for a given distance is higher at 2.6GHz, as compared to the 700MHz band. For the same propagation loss of 130dB, the propagation distance for 2.6GHz is about 500 meters, whereas it is roughly 1.6 kilometers for the 700 MHz band. Moreover, to cover the same area, the number of cell sites used for 2.6GHz will be seven to eight times more than 700MHz. The figure below illustrates the coverage area of a single site utilizing different frequency bands (dense urban scenario is assumed):


Source: ZTE research paper

Lower frequency waves are also believed to penetrate thick walls and, hence, reach areas like basements. Therefore, the signal is more uniform over a given area for the low-band spectrum. According to Verizon, LTE (4G) deployed at 700MHz is almost five times more efficient than the company's 3G.

To review, lower frequency waves can travel farther, they have uniform signal distribution, and less equipment and cell sites will be required for deployment. This will result in reliable and extended coverage at lower costs.

Current competitive positioning
Verizon and AT&T hold almost two-thirds of the low-band spectrum, whereas T-Mobile and Sprint hold approximately 10%. This is good evidence of better coverage and quality from Verizon and AT&T over the other two. Sprint holds some 800MHz, and T-Mobile recently purchased 700MHz in a swap agreement with Verizon.

However, this will not help these companies compete on an equal footing with Verizon and AT&T. They can set up comparable coverage on high-frequency bands, but that will result in high deployment and, in the long run, high operating costs. So, even if they are able to deploy comparable coverage, high operating costs will continue to affect the performance of these companies going forward.

FCC intervention and the future outlook
Despite four players in the industry, two are dominating, and the Federal Communications Commission wants to change that. FCC chairman Tom Wheeler, in a letter to representative John barrow, reaffirmed his plans to restrict the amount of spectrum Verizon and AT&T could buy in the spectrum auction next year. Wheeler wrote, "The Incentive Auction offers the opportunity, possibly the last for years to come, to make low-band spectrum available to any mobile wireless provider, in any market, that is willing and able to compete at auction."

The 600MHz band auction is expected in mid-2015, and the FCC is expected to set aside 30MHz for companies with a smaller share of the low-band spectrum. 6MHz television stations will be converted to 5MHz LTE, which is a significant development for the telecom industry. By enabling companies like T-Mobile and Sprint to buy low-band spectrum, the FCC is leveling the playing field. The acquisition of 600MHz will assist the above-mentioned companies in deploying larger networks at lower costs. The bandwidth will be lower than 700MHz, but comparable speeds can be achieved through carrier aggregation.



Source: Qualcomm

In short, both T-Mobile and Sprint will offer approximately the same quality of service as Verizon and AT&T. The differentiation of networks will disappear, making price competition the key success factor over the next couple of years.

AT&T has threatened to boycott the auction because of the proposed restrictions. As the note from the FCC chairman was released after AT&T's threat, it seems that the FCC is quite serious about these restrictions, and the probability of the restrictions remaining intact is quite high. However, if AT&T and Verizon are somehow able to get them removed, the FCC can consider a potential merger between Sprint and T-Mobile, which would effectively result in the same outcomes as the auction. One way or another, a level playing field awaits players in the telecom industry, and the inevitable price war bodes ill for industry margins and profit generation. On the brighter side, consumers will likely enjoy cheaper packages going forward.

Your cable company is scared, but you can get rich
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Muhammad Saeed has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information