Railroad Investors May See Some Bumpy Rides Ahead

Railroad companies, especially major Class 1 rail carriers such as Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP  ) , Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC  ) and CSX (NYSE: CSX  ) , have had mostly a smooth ride since the current economic recovery. To be classified as a Class 1 carrier, a company's annual operating revenue has to be over an annually adjusted threshold, which is $452.7 million for 2012. Freight revenue at the these three companies ranges from several billions to tens of billions of dollars each over the past five years, making them the leading Class 1 rail carriers. However, the percentage of revenue that all railroad companies generate is only in the teens over the aggregate revenue from all means of transportation.

Meanwhile, freight volumes by railroads as measured by ton miles are over 40% of the total freight moved in the U.S., more than any other mode of transportation. But future growth at railroad companies may be inhibited because of current, underdeveloped railroad capacity that has caused rail traffic congestion and delivery delays amid rising shipping demands. New investments are likely needed even if they may put a dent on earnings initially. With increased capacity and improved services, investors may see faster revenue growth from both higher freight volumes and greater rail pricing power.

Rail revenue and shipping charge
Speaking of pricing power for different types of transportation carriers, railroad companies seem to have the least of it, and freight services by rail are the most inexpensive means of transportation, especially compared to trucking. Revenue for railroad companies can add up because the calculation takes into account the long distance that shipments travel when carried by rail. Premium shipping charges usually are based on timely delivery, something typical of short or mid-haul transportation by trucks. Actually, trucking has increasingly become part of rail freight services via intermodal transportation whereby the intended, but otherwise unreachable, rail points are connected to truck routes. Having to be assisted by other forms of transportation may further limit rail carriers' ability to set higher rail shipping rates.

Shipments that travel by rail often are not time-sensitive deliveries. Here shippers primarily are concerned about a carrier's ability to move bulky cargoes safely to their final destinations and have to be flexible in dealing with uncertainties in rail travel time. Surprising delays can also happen because of overbooked rail capacity sometimes. Unreliable delivery time is a main reason that railroad companies don't have much negotiating power with shipping charges, which partly undermines revenue growth. Average five-year sales growth is barely 4% at Union Pacific and just over 1% for both Norfolk Southern and CSX.

Rail revenue and shipping capacity
While slow freight train speed affects delivery time, many delays are caused by congestion at major rail hubs and insufficient total rail capacity to meet increasing shipping demands. As the economy continues to grow, railroads have to keep pace with the rising need of moving more freight around. Since rail tracks were first laid more than 180 year ago, America's railroad landscape hasn't seen much of a staggering transformation. Today, freight trains still share tracks with passenger trains and must grant Amtrak and other commuter trains the guarantee of passage. Without further expansion, the current 200,000 miles long U.S. rail network may be running out of reach as the economy continues to pull ahead of it.

Unlike public highways, waterways and airways, railroads are maintained privately by railroad companies that build and own them. To be fair, railroad companies spend far more than average U.S. manufacturers in capital expenditures. Data show that railroad companies spend 17% of their revenue on capital expenditures, compared to 3% for manufacturers. Also, largest U.S. railroad companies each year spend more on their tracks and infrastructure than most states spend on their highways.

Rail investments and growth
But most of the spending is on maintenance of current tacks and equipment, rather than on new investments to expand capacity and increase efficiency. New investments are what will more likely lead to improved services and generate more sales, and more revenue can feed right back to further investments, creating a positive business cycle. Without continually growing revenue to support, at least, the massive maintenance costs, current business practice at railroad companies may not be sustainable in the long run, and risk having poorer quality of services and potentially staggering sales.

Major railroad companies largely operate within their own rail networks, with Union Pacific and BNSF mostly in the West and Norfolk Southern and CSX in the East and Midwest. So, despite low shipping charges, operating margins at railroad companies are rather satisfactory, all in the 30% range, when the lack of competition creates no additional pricing pressure.

But without eventual increases in the amount of freight they can haul each year, railroad companies will see less earnings growth and thus, slower expansion of shareholders' equity for their investors. Growing shipping demands have to be met by increased rail capacity that can only come from building additional track routes, even though the investment costs may cause some earnings bumps in the short run.

3 stock picks to ride America's energy bonanza
Record oil and natural gas production is revolutionizing the United States' energy position. Finding the right plays while historic amounts of capital expenditures are flooding the industry will pad your investment nest egg. For this reason, the Motley Fool is offering a look at three energy companies using a small IRS "loophole" to help line investor pockets. Learn this strategy, and the energy companies taking advantage, in our special report "The IRS Is Daring You To Make This Energy Investment." Don't miss out on this timely opportunity; click here to access your report -- it's absolutely free. 


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2014, at 8:57 AM, cedric wrote:

    does any of this have to do with large scale sell offs of railroad lines after the stagger's deregulation act?

    railroads i feel never anticipated such a surge in traffic from all areas and the includes passenger service.

    i hope alot of the track that was pulled up and the lines turned into trails where kept in the form of "rail banking" so that in the event the line is needed again track can be laid for rail service.

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2014, at 10:00 AM, Tweenthelines726 wrote:

    A very wordy and abstract commentary.....show some facts backed up by research. Example: NSC has made vast improvements in its rails and routes in the past few years.

  • Report this Comment On May 07, 2014, at 8:59 PM, henrobrice wrote:

    So your idea is that the economy is going to become too strong for railroads to keep up? Like the poster above me, please support your claims with statistics- railroads are investing more than ever before, especially in Mexico and the west coast.

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2014, at 3:17 PM, jake8282 wrote:

    Hahaha. So they can't run longer trains through distributed power? They can't lay additional sidings or double track a line like the UP is doing on the Sunset Route? They can't continue to improve signaling, thus improving traffic flow? They can't improve hump yard operations? All this won't allow longer, faster trains?

    Intermodal has a portion which is premium service; fast moving, expensive cargo that must get to it's destination within a certain time.

    Go out and watch a double tracked main line, sure it's busy, but I'm sure they can handle a lot more volume over the coming decades with continual investment in their existing infrastructure.

    As I look at the country, I see we will continue to consume more of everything and the rails will be right there to move it.

  • Report this Comment On May 11, 2014, at 6:53 PM, royblan wrote:

    On every earnings call somebody asks how much more freight they can carry with the extistig asset set. The answer is invariably 10-15%.

    Railroading is a batch business and you make the most earnings by running a dense network. Branchlines were sold off because they couldn't

    Provide the density needed to survive.

    Want to see density? Go stand trackside on NS at Cresson, Pa or on the UP at Gibbon, Neb. Ride the VIA Canadian EB Vancouver-Toronto and watch the parade. That's density, and there's room for more.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2938030, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 8:50:10 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement