Why Are Refiners Worried About the U.S. Lifting the Ban on Crude Exports?

Some of the biggest beneficiaries of the shale boom in the U.S. have been refiners such as Valero Energy (NYSE: VLO  ) , Marathon Petroleum (NYSE: MPC  ) , and Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX  ) . Rising production in the U.S. has widened the spread between WTI and Brent crude, boosting refiners' margins. However, it has also led to calls for the U.S. to lift its decades-old ban on crude oil exports. It is believed that the lifting of ban on crude oil exports will push prices of WTI closer to the global benchmark. Not surprisingly, refiners have opposed any such moves as their margins will be hurt. But a recent report suggests that the White House is nonetheless taking an active look at the crude export ban.

Refiners and their margins
Rising oil production in the U.S. has changed the dynamics of the global energy market. It has also had a major impact on U.S. refiners' financial performance. Refining stocks were among the best performers last year, with shares of Valero, Marathon Petroleum, and Phillips 66 gaining more than 50%.

A surge in U.S. oil production created a glut at the storage hub in Cushing, Oklahoma. This was because most of the refineries on the Gulf Coast have been configured to process heavier, sour crude and not the light, sweet crude produced in the U.S. The supply glut pushed WTI prices lower and created a significant spread between the U.S. and global benchmark. The biggest beneficiaries of this have been refiners. Lower WTI prices mean that refiners get a cheaper feedstock. The finished refined products, though, are linked to more expensive Brent crude. As a result, refiners have enjoyed healthy margins over the last few years.

Their margins, however, were threatened in the first quarter of 2014 as the spread between WTI and Brent crude narrowed. Valero, when it released its first-quarter results recently, said that it saw a decline in gasoline and distillate margins in most regions and lower WTI discounts relative to Brent crude. While Valero still managed to see an improvement in its throughput margin, this was mainly due to the fact that the larger light sweet and sour crude oil discounts in the U.S. Gulf Coast more than offset a decline in gasoline and distillate margins and narrower spread between WTI and Brent.

Phillips 66 also felt the impact of a narrower spread in the first quarter as the company's earnings from its refining business dropped to $306 million from $904 million reported in the first quarter of 2013. Marathon Petroleum's earnings dropped substantially in the first quarter as two of its largest refineries carried out maintenance work; however, the company attributed some of the decline to narrower crude differentials as well.

While a narrower spread had a negative impact on refiners' margins in the first quarter, the good news for them is that the spread has once again widened as crude stockpiles in the U.S. have risen significantly in recent weeks. However, a recent report might cause some concern for refiners.

White House taking a look at crude export ban
According to the Financial Times, the White House is looking closely at the U.S. ban on exports of crude oil. Citing John Podesta, one of President Obama's most senior advisors, the Financial Times reported that the Obama administration was taking an active look at strains caused by the U.S. shale oil boom.

Lifting of ban on crude exports will certainly clear some of the oil glut in the U.S. and push WTI prices higher. While the move is expected to be welcomed by producers, refiners are likely to oppose it. The refiners' opposition to lifting the ban is not surprising as higher WTI prices would hurt their margin. So far, refiners have argued their case by saying that keeping the ban in place will allow U.S. consumers to reap the benefit of the U.S. oil bonanza. Refiners say that allowing crude export would increase WTI prices, which would push domestic gasoline prices higher. However, their argument is flawed.

Indeed, a move to lift the ban could push domestic gasoline prices higher. But as I have discussed in a previous article, if the ban remains in place, keeping WTI prices lower, there will not be any incentive for the U.S. producers to increase their output. Producers will also be discouraged to make new investment to increase their output. In such a scenario, it is likely that the U.S. oil production will drop and refiners will be forced to import more at prices linked to the global benchmark.

Therefore, even by keeping the ban in place, there is a strong possibility that domestic gasoline prices would go higher. At the same time, the U.S. would miss out an opportunity to capitalize on its oil boom. The fact that the White House is looking at the crude oil export ban is a positive sign. For refiners, though, the development could be worrying, given the impact lifting of the ban could have on their margin.

OPEC is absolutely terrified of this game-changer
Imagine a company that rents a very specific and valuable piece of machinery for $41,000… per hour (that’s almost as much as the average American makes in a year!). And Warren Buffett is so confident in this company’s can’t-live-without-it business model, he just loaded up on 8.8 million shares. An exclusive, brand-new Motley Fool report reveals the company we’re calling OPEC’s Worst Nightmare. Just click HERE to uncover the name of this industry-leading stock… and join Buffett in his quest for a veritable LANDSLIDE of profits!

 


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 16, 2014, at 12:16 PM, sporttster wrote:

    However it works out, the consumer is screwed. The best thing that we could do is get off oil completely and go hydrogen which is plentiful.

  • Report this Comment On May 16, 2014, at 1:23 PM, speculawyer wrote:

    Hydrogen is plentiful? LOL. No. Well, hydrogen is plentiful but it is tightly bound to other elements. You need to input energy to separate. So hydrogen is merely an energy carrier, not an energy source. 98% of hydrogen is made from steam-reforming methane gas.

  • Report this Comment On May 17, 2014, at 11:03 AM, virgodave wrote:

    Three words that scare the hell out of petroleum. HEMP SEED OIL. Hemp,coming soon to a field near you. :)

  • Report this Comment On May 17, 2014, at 2:31 PM, tmolaee wrote:

    Maybe if refiners had been proactive and passed savings to the consumers and let consumers know they were getting discounted gasoline. Then maybe consumers would be on the refiners side to stop oil exports. But it appears that no one is on the consumers side so let the exports happen and let the chips fall where they may. If refiners have to keep up with new plants and equipment and pipelines like keystone come online maybe there will be a huge glut of oil in America and the consumers for once will get some relief.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2960399, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/23/2014 7:44:03 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement