A Kinect-less Xbox One Is a More Powerful Xbox One

Now that's it's priced competitively with the PlayStation 4, Microsoft can free additional processing power allowing the Xbox One to compete even further with the competition.

May 20, 2014 at 1:30PM

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) has had a hard time coming to the realization that its vision for the living room, largely driven by the Kinect motion sensing peripheral, wasn't as successful as it had hoped. This past Tuesday, Microsoft lowered the price of the Xbox One from $499 to $399 by offering a Kinect-less version, allowing for the console to match the price of Sony's (NYSE:SNE) PlayStation 4.

Source: Microsoft

While it's up for debate as to how this move will affect Xbox One sales, one positive that has gone overlooked is that now with the console is freed of the Kinect, precious processing power that was once reserved for the sensor will now potentially be in the hands of the developers.

The Xbox One is about to become more powerful
As of now, the Xbox One has a conservative 10% reservation for handling system-level Kinect functions. These functions include the ability to listen for voice commands, recognize gestures whether you're playing a game or not, using applications, and browsing through the dashboard. Even if a game never utilizes any of the functions of the Kinect – and the majority of titles don't – that processing power is still fenced off from developers.

After the price drop, Polygon got in contact with Microsoft executive Yusuf Mehdi who confirmed that Microsoft is now in talks with publishers regarding increasing graphical performance for Xbox One games running on Kinect-less consoles.

Microsoft had been planning to open this space for developers at some point in the future, most likely through finding more efficient ways of utilizing how the GPU processes Kinect featured functions. With what will most likely become the standard Xbox One SKU, however, there is no need for that portion to be fenced off any longer.

Why Microsoft needs to squeeze all the juice it can out of the Xbox One
Much of the momentum the PlayStation 4 has managed to keep since launch is due to two key things: being significantly more powerful and significantly cheaper. In other words, it's just a much better value. This is highlighted through the console receiving the definitive versions of multiplatform releases.

On the other hand, the Xbox One version of multiplatform titles fail to hit the same resolution or framerates of the PlayStation 4. A recent example of this was Konami's Metal Gear Solid 5: Ground Zeroes, where the PlayStation 4 version is running at a full native 1080p presentation and a solid smooth 60fps. Meanwhile, the Xbox One version runs at 720p and even with the game running at 66% of the resolution of its counterpart, it struggles to keep a solid 60fps.

Source: DualSHOCKERS

The extra 10% might not significantly close the gap, but had those portions of the GPU not have been barred from developers then the lack of parity between multiplatform titles would've been less pronounced. In some cases, it could have lead to perfect parity. Had Electronic Arts' Dice had the additional power, Battlefield 4 on the Xbox One (which runs at 720p) might have potentially had its resolution bumped to the PlayStation 4 version's 900p.

The Foolish bottom line
Microsoft was intent on having the Kinect be the core of the Xbox One, but that plan had backfired. A Kinect-less Xbox One, on top of removing the paywall for apps like Netflix and ESPN, is a move that Microsoft should have made well before launch. As a result, the PlayStation 4 has sold 7 million consoles since launch while Microsoft has managed to only sell just 5 million Xbox One consoles.

The price drop will help slow down the ever-growing gap between the two, but I don't feel as if it will be enough. Even at $399, the PlayStation 4 is a much better value. This move at least puts Microsoft in a position to aggressively engage in a price war with Sony down the line. 

Perhaps Microsoft didn't replace cable, but your cable company is still scared
You know cable's going away. But do you know how to profit? There's $2.2 trillion out there to be had. Currently, cable grabs a big piece of it. That won't last. And when cable falters, three companies are poised to benefit. Click here for their names. Hint: They're not Netflix, Google, and Apple. 


Rodmon Dehghi owns shares of Sony (ADR). The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information