Liquefied Natural Gas Set to Transform Railroad Industry

As the shale boom is currently supplying North America with ample LNG, railroad companies are investigating the use of LNG locomotives to reduce costs, improve margins, and comply with stricter emission standards.

Jun 5, 2014 at 1:55PM

With the inevitability of rising fuel costs and stricter emissions standards for locomotives set to take effect in 2015, class 1 railroad companies such as Berkshire Hathaway's Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC, Union Pacific (NYSE:UNP)Canadian National Railway (TSX:CNR), and CSX Corp. (NYSE:CSX) are researching alternatives to manage their expenses. One of the alternatives the railroad companies are exploring is switching from diesel to liquefied natural gas, or LNG, as the main source of power for their locomotives.

The idea of LNG in the transportation industry is not a new one, as the trucking industry has been using LNG since the mid-'90s. Railroad companies also flirted with the idea in the late 1980's and early 1990's, but these ideas were shelved in part due to the rising costs of natural gas.

Sparked by the significant price decline of LNG In 2008 and the shale revolution currently underway in North America, the idea of using LNG as a main source of fuel has been reignited. According to Lorenzo Simonelli, CEO of General Electric's (NYSE:GE) transportation unit, "If you believe the price advantage over diesel is going to stay here for the next 10 to 15 years, then LNG is a revolutionary fuel."

At this point in time, railroad companies have many questions that need to be answered before proceeding with a massive industry change. Questions regarding locomotive engine performance, including fuel efficiency and emissions, have not been thoroughly evaluated and answered. Another set of questions that need to be explored cover the issues surrounding infrastructure. The infrastructure issue includes converting fuel facilities, as well as funding adjustments to railroad operations, including interchanges that connect railroads.

Further research shows that if railway companies decide that the advantages of a fuel transition outweigh the disadvantages, short-term capital costs look to be immense. A company expects between 15 and 20 years out of a locomotive, and they cost around $2 million each to make; conversion costs for locomotives less than 10 years old are estimated to be between $600,000 to $1,000,000. Conversion costs for older locomotives (10 years +) are estimated to be between $400,000 and $600,000. According to Railway Age, at current natural gas prices the savings associated with the conversion are around $200,000 per locomotive per year. Based on the age and viability of the locomotive it would take between two and five years for a company to make a positive return on its investment.

Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) and General Electric are currently teaming up with Union Pacific to begin field testing liquid natural gas-fueled locomotives. Union Pacific indicates that it is still very much in the early analysis phase. "We are working closely with locomotive and engine manufacturers, cryogenic fuel-tank suppliers and natural gas/LNG suppliers to complete our analysis." Final results from these tests are expected to come out in at least one to two years, and, according to railway magazine, if these tests are positive, "LNG locomotives could be in widespread use by 2016 or 2017." 

Setting themselves up to take advantage of the potential behind the industry change is General Electric. GE Transportation offers a retrofit kit that enables existing Evolution Series locomotives to operate on both diesel and LNG. These kits are designed to substitute up to 80% of diesel fuel with LNG. Even with the two sources, GE states its use can reduce fuel costs by 50% without diminishing performance. These retrofit models currently meet EPA Tier 3 emission standards, and also allow a fully loaded train to travel further distances without refueling stops.

Foolish conclusion
Currently, railroad companies such as Union Pacific, CSX, and Canadian National Railway are exploring opportunities behind converting diesel fueled locomotives to LNG. At this time there are many questions that need to be explored before a massive industry change begins to take place -- but as recent data suggests, at current natural gas prices, the savings associated with the conversion are around $200,000 per locomotive per year. At that price point it is estimated that a company will make its money back within two to five years. An alternative way to play the anticipated change is through GE and Caterpilllar. Both companies are working with the railroad companies and are on the cutting edge of the innovation and technology that will foster the change from diesel to LNG.   

Do you know this energy tax "loophole"?
You already know record oil and natural gas production is changing the lives of millions of Americans. But what you probably haven’t heard is that the IRS is encouraging investors to support our growing energy renaissance, offering you a tax loophole to invest in some of America’s greatest energy companies. Take advantage of this profitable opportunity by grabbing your brand-new special report, “The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!,” and you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.


Jeff Williams is currently long Canadian National Railway. The Motley Fool owns shares of CSX and General Electric Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

A Financial Plan on an Index Card

Keeping it simple.

Aug 7, 2015 at 11:26AM

Two years ago, University of Chicago professor Harold Pollack wrote his entire financial plan on an index card.

It blew up. People loved the idea. Financial advice is often intentionally complicated. Obscurity lets advisors charge higher fees. But the most important parts are painfully simple. Here's how Pollack put it:

The card came out of chat I had regarding what I view as the financial industry's basic dilemma: The best investment advice fits on an index card. A commenter asked for the actual index card. Although I was originally speaking in metaphor, I grabbed a pen and one of my daughter's note cards, scribbled this out in maybe three minutes, snapped a picture with my iPhone, and the rest was history.

More advisors and investors caught onto the idea and started writing their own financial plans on a single index card.

I love the exercise, because it makes you think about what's important and forces you to be succinct.

So, here's my index-card financial plan:


Everything else is details. 

Something big just happened

I don't know about you, but I always pay attention when one of the best growth investors in the world gives me a stock tip. Motley Fool co-founder David Gardner (whose growth-stock newsletter was rated #1 in the world by The Wall Street Journal)* and his brother, Motley Fool CEO Tom Gardner, just revealed two brand new stock recommendations moments ago. Together, they've tripled the stock market's return over 12+ years. And while timing isn't everything, the history of Tom and David's stock picks shows that it pays to get in early on their ideas.

Click here to be among the first people to hear about David and Tom's newest stock recommendations.

*"Look Who's on Top Now" appeared in The Wall Street Journal which references Hulbert's rankings of the best performing stock picking newsletters over a 5-year period from 2008-2013.

Compare Brokers