1 Mortgage Mistake Millions of Americans Make

Purchasing a home is the largest and sometimes the only major long-term investment millions of Americans will make. Here is one more potential mistake that many homebuyers make at mortgage origination.

Jun 7, 2014 at 11:00AM

Source: Flickr / Mark Moz.

Buying beyond our means, adjustable rate mortgages, and reverse mortgages are common mortgage mistakes that many consumers make. But even financially savvy Americans can make the wrong choice when it comes to paying mortgage discount points. The decision on whether or not to pay points is not necessarily as simple as many mortgage originators would have homebuyers believe.

In a perfect world...
In general, each mortgage discount point paid at a price of 1% of the mortgage loan reduces the mortgage interest rate by 0.25%. Over the course of a 30-year mortgage, this can amount to a huge overall savings.

Using a sample mortgage of $250,000 with a 5% mortgage loan interest rate, (without any points paid) the total interest paid over the life of the loan amounts to $233,139. The same mortgage loan with one point paid (for a cost of $2,500) has interest that amounts to $219,483. In other words, the $2,500 investment toward reducing mortgage loan interest resulted in a savings of $13,656, which minus the original investment amounts to $11,156. A no-brainer? Let's do the math.

The reality of the situation
The interest savings realized each month in the above mortgage situation with one point paid totals $37.93, meaning that it would take about 66 months, 5.5 years, to make back the initial $2,500 investment. The simplest (and somewhat flawed) assumption homeowners make is that if they plan to keep the same mortgage for at least the 5.5 year threshold, then paying points is a good investment.

In what seems like a feel-good gesture, the nation's largest mortgage originators like Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) and JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM) provide homebuyers the option to pay points and in some cases even finance points as part of their mortgage amount. Here are a few reasons why the true payback may not be as grand as the math implies.


Source: Flickr / Mark Moz.

The first consideration is whether the homeowner has 1% of the home's value to pay points on the mortgage loan. If this money is tough to get and could result in other higher-interest loans, the decision not to pay points is fairly obvious. But let's assume the homeowner has an additional $2,500 available.

The biggest issue to consider is the opportunity cost of the $2,500 invested to pay down the mortgage loan interest rate. Consider two reasonable alternatives to how the same money may be spent. Option one would be to use the $2,500 as an additional down payment on the loan, option two would be to invest the $2,500 and yield a conservative 5% rate of return.

Using the $2,500 as an additional down payment would lower the monthly mortgage payment by $13.42, and extending the breakeven point from 5.5 years to 102 months, or 8.5 years. Beyond 8.5 years, paying points still may be the better investment, but homeowners unsure of how long they may reside in the home may be better off putting the money toward their down payment and gaining an immediate return on their investment.

Though small, the contribution toward reaching a 20% downpayment would also hypothetically lead to a quicker removal of the required Private Mortgage Insurance or PMI that lenders automatically place on mortgage loans in excess of 80% of the home's value.

Option two had the homeowner investing the $2,500 with an expected 5% yield. Over the 30-year life of the loan, the original investment would be worth $11,170, compared with the $13,656 saved in interest.

If the investment can yield 5.68% compounded monthly, the future value of the investment roughly equates to the interest savings from paying points. If the homeowner can earn a still reasonable 8% rate of return, that investment would be worth twice as much as the amount of interest saved by paying points.

Making the right choice
The break-even point cited by mortgage originators is a guideline at best, and makes the assumption that you can afford 1% of your mortgage loan amount and second, that you would otherwise not invest it wisely. While I hope the first condition is something you can meet, I hope the second is not. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your circumstances. 

Take advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American homeowner and taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Shamus Funk has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo and has the following options: short June 2014 $50 calls on Wells Fargo and short June 2014 $48 puts on Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information