General Motors Company: 2 Major Points Signaling That U.S. Consumers Don't Care About Recalls

Despite recalling millions and millions of vehicles, General Motors has yet to feel the pinch in its monthly sales results.

Jun 18, 2014 at 6:35PM

Toward the end of May and ahead of the monthly sales results, in my article "Will Customers Ultimately Ditch General Motors Company?", I suggested that sales could begin to show signs of weakness when compared to the rest of the sector, due to the increasing amount of recalls and negative headlines about General Motors (NYSE:GM)

In short, I was wrong. In fact, I was completely wrong. Not only have sales of General Motors not declined in the past few months leading up to May, but the automaker did extremely well in the month, as sales rose 13%. 

Here's a look at the sales results in March, April, and May, following the original announcement of the ignition switch recall in mid-February:

Month Sales Growth (year-over-year)


April 7%
May 13%

Source: General Motors Sales Release

May's auto sales for General Motors were the best results since August 2008, which really drives home the point that consumers simply do not care about the recalls.

Gm Recalls

Source: MojoMotors (Click to enlarge)

Another telling fact about the recalls
If sales didn't speak enough for the fact that consumers aren't troubled by the recall woes at GM, then this will:

In a study of over 35,000 email leads to car dealerships on, only two people asked about a vehicle recall. Two! That's .005 percent! This is interesting because as automakers continue breaking records left and right by recalling millions of vehicles for anything from spiders to electronic issues, shoppers still don't care. 

Of course, you can poke holes in this statistic if you so desired. Perhaps shoppers have considered only a handful vehicles, and did the full research themselves to determine if there has already been a recall on that specific model, (although they could inquire to see if it has been repaired, if one of the models they wanted were on the recall list). 

This statistic is also not exclusive to General Motors, meaning that the several million other vehicles that have been recalled in 2014 are also of little concern. Again, this is not the stat-to-end-all-stats, but it certainly speaks some amount of volume to say that only two out of 35,000 people inquired about recall issues when reaching out to used car dealerships. 

MojoMotors CEO Paul Nadjarian had this to say on the GM recall:

Although the press and industry insiders are outraged by the volume of GM recalls, the average consumer cares more about topics like who is buying the Clippers and what happened at Kim & Kanye's wedding? Recalls are just not a hot topic for the average consumer.

So is this the "all-clear" sign to buy shares?
Some investors have been saying that shares of GM are cheap, valuation-wise, and have been worthy of your investment dollars since Day 1 of the ignition switch recall.  

I have not shared that belief with them. And to be frank, I still do not share that belief. It's not that I do not like the General Motors company, I just do not like shares of General Motors at this time. 

I'll admit, I am less bearish on the stock now that consumers have essentially proven -- both with their inquiries and more powerfully, with their dollars -- that the recalls are not bothersome.

Regardless, I'm hesitant to buy General Motors for one real reason: future risk. 

In "3 Reasons Not to Buy General Motors", I outlined (like the title may suggest) three reasons I'm steering clear of the stock. One of those events has already happened, which was that first-quarter profits would get squeezed. 

The other two negative catalysts, which come in the form of a hefty Justice Department fine and a victim compensation fund, are not going to be cheap. 

Perhaps investors won't really care about those two upcoming events, much like how consumers don't seem to care about the recalls. But I am sticking with the belief that it's better to be safe, than sorry.  

The bottom line
Sales have yet to suffer from the slew of recalls at General Motors, and it appears unlikely that they will in future. 

But those two negative headwinds that I mentioned above are going to be expensive, like probably more than $2 billion expensive (read the article above for more information), and if I'm going to be a buyer of General Motors, I'd rather wait until after that news is out, rather than get in before it's released. 

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Bret Kenwell has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends General Motors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information