These 3 Dow Stocks Might be Too Richly Valued for You

Don't chase yield if it means settling for a company with substandard growth.

Jul 21, 2014 at 4:30PM

For five years, American stock market indices have marched relentlessly higher, and for the better part of those five years, financial pundits have warned that market valuations are simply too high. The key metric behind these arguments has been the Schiller P/E, or the cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio -- the CAPE -- which is an attempt by Yale economist Robert Shiller to present more historically accurate marketwide valuations by dividing the S&P 500's current price by an average of the inflation-adjusted earnings of all components over the preceding 10 years.

By this measure, today's market almost certainly is overvalued. The current S&P 500 CAPE of nearly 26 looks poised to push past 2007's levels and touch heights that have only ever been reached toward the ends of the two greatest market bubbles in U.S. history:

S&P 500 Cyclically Adjusted Price-Earnings Ratio Chart

S&P 500 Cyclically Adjusted Price-Earnings Ratio data by YCharts.

But while the S&P 500 may seem overvalued on the whole, savvy investors can still find good values in less-bubbly parts of the market. The S&P's P/E, which assesses valuations on the standard trailing 12-month basis, is currently only 19.1, and many of its individual components trade at even lower valuations. Larger stocks tend to be among the best bargains, and the large cap-focused Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJINDICES:^DJI) clocks in with an aggregate P/E of just 16.7, with 19 of its 30 components boasting P/E ratios below the S&P average.

Does that mean that the Dow is actually full of cheap stocks? Not quite. Shares of large-cap stocks have historically traded at lower multiples than the shares of smaller companies with greater growth prospects. Additionally, looking only at a stock's P/E can overlook one important element of its valuation -- the change in valuations against a long-term average that can often signal a swing from bearish to bullish sentiment, or vice versa.

On this measure, the Dow almost certainly is overvalued. Only five of its 30 components sport a trailing P/E below the five-year average of their P/E ratios. Of these five, two (AT&T (NYSE:T) and Verizon (NYSE:VZ), the index's two telecom representatives) are at unusually low valuations relative to their long-term averages after recording significant one-time gains on their generally accepted accounting principles earnings. They are not actually "cheap," since both companies' more relevant trailing price-to-free-cash flow ratios are currently above their five-year averages. Two of the remaining "cheap" stocks belong to financial components, which can also suffer huge swings in earnings from time to time.

Nearly every Dow component now trades at a P/E higher than its five-year average, but three stocks stand out in particular. Only Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG), Merck (NYSE:MRK), and UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) have P/E ratios that are presently over 30% higher than their five-year averages. Each case is a bit different, but all have produced similar results in that time -- share prices have been pushed relentlessly higher by rising valuations, whether earnings have actually grown rapidly (as in UnitedHealth's case) or deteriorated (as they have for Merck):

MRK Chart

MRK data by YCharts.

UnitedHealth, despite leading all Dow components with a P/E nearly 40% higher than its five-year average, is actually one of the healthiest options of all 30 blue-chip stocks. Its 15.3 P/E is lower than most of its peers, and its bottom line has grown at a faster rate than all but one other non-telecom, non-bank Dow component. Merck and P&G, on the other hand, pose cautionary examples. While investors have flocked to these dividend superstars in search of safe returns, they have had to accept subpar bottom-line growth in the bargain: Only six other Dow components (including Merck) posted weaker earnings-per-share growth than P&G over the past five years; meanwhile, none have done worse than Merck, which is the only Dow component to endure a double-digit percentage-point drop in EPS since the recession ended. There's nothing wrong with investing in a company whose valuation is growing, but it's important to make sure it's growing for the right reasons.

Top dividend stocks for the next decade
The smartest investors know that dividend stocks simply crush their non-dividend paying counterparts over the long term. That's beyond dispute. They also know that a well-constructed dividend portfolio creates wealth steadily, while still allowing you to sleep like a baby. Knowing how valuable such a portfolio might be, our top analysts put together a report on a group of high-yielding stocks that should be in any income investor's portfolio. To see our free report on these stocks, just click here now.

Alex Planes has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Procter & Gamble and UnitedHealth Group. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information