Sorry, the Barnes & Noble and Google Partnership Won't Beat Amazon

There's no denying Amazon.com's (NASDAQ: AMZN  ) dominance in online retail and bookselling, but that's not stopping Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS  )  from doing everything it can to match its rival's shipping prowess. That's why last week the company teamed up with Google (NASDAQ: GOOG  ) (NASDAQ: GOOGL  )  to offer same-day delivery of its books.

While it's hardly a bad idea to have Google your side, it's doubtful the new partnership will invigorate B&N's business.


Source: Google.

New delivery option, same business model
Barnes & Noble is tapping Google Shopping Express, a same-day delivery service that uses people to physically shop for customers' orders at retailers such as CostcoTarget, and Walgreen, and then delivers the goods to the buyers' homes. Google Shopping Express is a new initiative that is only available in five cities right now, but Barnes & Noble's deal with Google is limited to Manhattan, West Los Angeles, and the San Francisco Bay area.

While this may seem like a great idea for B&N to tackle Amazon head-on, the potential upside is very limited.

For starters, B&N members already have free express shipping for their orders. In New York City, even customers who are not B&N members already had a same-day shipping option before Google came into the picture. So the new partnership, at best, benefits nonmembers of Barnes & Noble who happen to be located in West L.A. and the San Francisco Bay area -- not nearly enough cities to make significant sales gains. Then again, Barnes & Noble told The New York Times that the partnership is a test, so it appears the program could expand into more cities in the future if things go well.

Right now, Google Shopping Express offers free, unlimited same-day delivery for members, and comes with a free six-month trial membership. The company hasn't said how much the membership will cost once the trial expires, but non-members pay about $5 per delivery, per store.

Why even try?
It's hard to fault B&N for trying to gain new retail customers. Over the past five years the company has closed about 63 stores, leaving it with a total of 660 retail stores (not to mention about 700 college bookstores). Despite the closures, in its fiscal fourth-quarter Barnes & Noble increased year over year revenue by just 3.5%. But for the full fiscal year, revenue was down 6.7%, and its Nook division plummeted 35.2%.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Nook. Source: Barnes & Noble.

In June, B&N said it would spin off Nook as a separate company. It announced that Samsung will take over future hardware designs for the Nook, while Barnes & Noble focuses on the software. The two companies have an event planned for later this month to give more details on the co-branded Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 Nook.

This is all part of Barnes & Noble's attempt to earn more revenue from book sales, but it's hard to see how the Google partnership will actually make that happen.

The problem here is that any customers who use Google Shopping Express to buy Barnes & Noble books become Google's customers, not B&N's. The delivery service isn't available on Barnes & Noble's website, which means all the books delivered under the partnership come from sales on Google's website.

With B&N desperately needing to increase sales, perhaps it doesn't care where the book sales are originating. But it seems odd to hand over any type of customer acquisition to another company while Barnes & Noble struggles to retain customers from Amazon.

Google, on the other hand, has the incentive to acquire additional customers for its new service, as it tries to lure people away from Amazon's website. Google makes about 90% of its annual revenue from search advertising, but it doesn't make a dime if users go straight to Amazon.com to buy products instead of doing a Web search first.

Kindle Fire tablet. Source: Amazon.

Why Amazon still wins
Amazon has two superior delivery services Google and B&N can't match. The first is Amazon's digital Kindle sales, which are a delivery system in their own right. Millions of books are available for instant download to Kindle devices, Android phones and tablets, Apple devices, and more. B&N's Nook titles can be downloaded to mobile devices as well, but the Kindle's pervasiveness easily outpaces the Nook.

In the fiscal fourth quarter, B&N sold just $25 million worth of Nook devices and accessories. Amazon doesn't break out sales of its books (or anything, really), but research from Morgan Stanley estimates the Kindle brand brought in $4.5 billion in revenue in 2013 and could reach more than $5 billion this year.

Aside from digital downloads, Amazon's two-day Prime shipping and experimental same-day shipping are a better bet for consumers than anything Google and B&N offer. Amazon has millions of titles at its disposal, while any one B&N location has 163,000 titles at most. And just last week, Amazon expanded its same-day shipping from four cities to 10.

So not only does Amazon have free two-day shipping options for its members -- and paid two-day options for nonmembers -- but it can also ship books to a customer's door the same day in 10 cities, compared to Google and B&N's three. Between Amazon's shipping options and its powerhouse Kindle brand, it appears B&N and Google's latest partnership is nothing more than a public relations campaign.

Leaked: Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you)
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!

 
 

Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 11, 2014, at 5:27 PM, notyouagain wrote:

    Maybe I will be the last remaining human being to go to his grave never having purchased anything from Amazon.

    So be it. I don't like them. As they attempt to disrupt every conventional and traditional form of commerce that exists in cities criss-crossing this great big country, how many jobs are they providing to replace those they are trying to destroy in local marketplaces nationwide?

    So in the end, where does the money keep coming from for people to buy their products when so many other businesses are disrupted and driven out of business?

    They will be victims of their own gluttony.

    And all their fans will see how stupid all this "showrooming" crap really was when there are no "showrooms" left... and too little competition left for Amazon to feel any need to offer the "best" prices, either.

    Running at a loss for years on end to drive everyone else out of business should be against the law.

    When all that's left of our cities is old buildings that no longer have tenants but instead are populated by desperate, homeless, jobless, dangerous indigent remember, Amazon fanboys, you rooted for it while it was happening and were too stupid to see it coming

  • Report this Comment On August 11, 2014, at 5:49 PM, notyouagain wrote:

    This rant is coming from someone who remembers a world most of you will never see...

    A world before the advent of the shopping malls turned our downtown areas into places where only seedy bars, adult book stores, and massage parlors flourished.

    Look around your local downtown area. Would you hand your eight-or-nine year old kid a few dollars spending money and tell him to meet you in a couple hours at the soda bar at Woolworth's today?? (if Woolworth's still existed)

    That used to not be a horrible, neglectful thing to do. Back then there wasn't a pervert on every corner.

    And yes, if Amazon is successful at the level of disruption they seem to be shooting for, what the shopping malls did to our cities was nothing compared to what Amazon will do.

    Have a nice day.

  • Report this Comment On August 11, 2014, at 11:47 PM, AgeOfRobots wrote:

    @notyouagain - cue the violins...

    Seriously, it's called creative destruction and it is a major component of the capitalist economic system. Just as the Automobile industry replaced the Horse and Carriage industry and the lightbulb displaced candles new disruptive industries make older less efficient ones obsolete.

    Nostalgia for the "good ole days" is normal but taken too far one becomes suspended in the past. Old industries and ways of life die, new ones are born, and the world continues to turn.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3067273, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/20/2014 9:27:33 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement