3 Reasons Why Microsoft Won't Kill VMWare

What a summer it's been for our scorecard at Motley Fool Rule Breakers! Many of our top picks are down big from our buy-in prices. Few, though, have taken the sort of beating Mr. Market has delivered to VMWare (NYSE: VMW  ) , down more than 47% since David Gardner picked it for the June issue. The problem, as I understand it, is competition from Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) and the sudden departure of VMWare co-founder Diane Greene.

"I believe that Miss Greene was 'finally' forced out by a board that all has ties to EMC (NYSE: EMC  ) ... Factor in the increasing competition from Mr. Softy, and this one could get real ugly, real fast," CAPS player TMFBreakerWade wrote in support of an 'underperform' call he made earlier this month.

Need a new strategy? Steal the playbook
Fair enough. During the company's conference call with analysts, new CEO Paul Maritz, a Microsoft alumnus, spoke to both investor concerns. But he spent far more time addressing Mr. Softy than Ms. Greene.

"I know that Microsoft is a formidable but not invincible competitor, I know that Microsoft can't afford to play a long waiting game," Maritz said. "But I also know from firsthand experience that where a competitor has a lead, and that competitor invests and innovates to stay ahead and to keep changing and raising customer value proposition, they can be very hard to catch even for Microsoft."

The message? Expect VMWare to keep investing in research and development -- more than 25% of revenue in the just-completed quarter -- and be aggressive in defending its turf. Maritz's strategy includes developing tools that make virtualization easier and more effective than it otherwise might, using Microsoft's alternative. Here are three reasons it'll work:

1. Webification. My apologies for the made-up word; I use it here to illustrate the importance of virtualization to cloud computing, otherwise known as software accessed via your browser, rather than installed and managed on the desktop. Imagine the moving parts involved in getting Web content to you -- the sort of grunt work that Akamai (Nasdaq: AKAM  ) and Limelight Networks (Nasdaq: LLNW  ) perform daily -- and you'll understand how complex a job it is to take a group of servers, connect them to the Web, and then slice their parts into usable chunks for optimum data delivery. VMWare still performs this high-wire act -- increasingly important in a Web-connected world -- better than anyone.

2. Specialization. Tech has birthed a number of well-funded generalists since the early days of the personal computer. Yet specialists still dominate certain markets, including Intuit (Nasdaq: INTU  ) in personal-finance software, and Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) in databases. Highly technical jobs often demand expertise that a generalist can't provide. Here, VMWare is the specialist.

3. Virtualization. Microsoft is an unabashed generalist, with an astounding track record in desktop software. And that's a problem: Mr. Softy's cloud computing strategy -- known as "software plus services" -- betrays a desktop bias that isn't likely to help its effort to unseat the cloudier VMWare. The thinking, as I understand it, is that the cloud and the browser isn't enough to support great software; users also need desktop access. To me, this approach sounds logical in the sound-bite sense -- "yeah, sure, software plus services" -- but, technologically, could add the sort of complexity that IT managers loathe.

Microsoft is a serious competitor, and Maritz is smart to watch his back. But I seriously doubt that the threat from Mr. Softy and others is so fierce that shares of VMWare should trade near a 52-week low. The implication? This business is no longer what we thought it was.

Perhaps not, but demand is still high. The biggest change -- and it is huge -- is that the guy who helped to write Microsoft's playbook for killing upstarts is now working for the other team. How bad can that be?

Fool contributor Tim Beyers owned shares of Akamai and Oracle at the time of publication. He seeks the best of the tech as a contributor to Motley Fool Rule Breakers, which counts Akamai as a core holding. Get a daily dose of Tim's Foolish musings via this feed for your RSS reader.

Microsoft is an Inside Value pick. Try this market-beating service risk-free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (7)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 29, 2008, at 5:00 PM, since62 wrote:

    Good article - i too feel share price is way overdone.

    Maritz from what i've heard sounds like a serious CEO - badly needed in Palo Alto.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2008, at 1:54 PM, umakethecall wrote:

    I have been following VMW from its IPO.

    The article helps one to understand their gut feelings.

    Mr. Softy is a greedy child with to many fingers in far to many pies. (and Sorry to say,) the new Head Chief, he just doesn't have what it takes. I would bet on VMW, Afterall, they stole Softies Playbook.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2008, at 2:07 PM, single29 wrote:

    Virtualization market is in its "ever expanding mode" these days,specially in such economic, consider how much space and electricity power saved in a expensive datacenter, even Mr.Softy gain some portion of market, it will not be enough to shake VMware's 70-80 percentage market domination status in 2-3 years. Any responsible CIO/administrator will not deploy their production servers in Hyper-V as that is huge responsibility for them. They could try it but not for production usage. They only pick world class ESX from VMW for enterprise usage.

    Also unlike other software, Server virtualization needs to deal with a lot of hardware and kernel which requires a lot of research and patent (intellectual property), they can't be obtained in a short period.

  • Report this Comment On August 15, 2008, at 2:43 PM, richman1211 wrote:

    I always chuckle at how MS bias 'clouds' people's judgement. Microsoft will make money in both the desktop and cloud environments - so will many other companies, and MS isn't VMWare's only competition.

    Anyway, I have no doubt that VMWare will find a way to make money going forward. They have a great product and the new CEO knows how to leverage it.

    My only comment is about MS''s "software + services" approach. Fact is, a lot of software is not 'cloud' friendly. Since Day 1, local desktop hardware is in a constant battle to keep up with new software. What makes anyone think cloud environments will be better for all things? Text messaging perhaps, Autocad probably not. All this Smells like the ole "The Network is the Computer' thing and diskless network computers will replace Microsoft and Intel, and grid computing, and........

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 695235, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2014 9:31:46 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement