Is Autodesk Too Expensive? No Way!

Recs

7

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

So you think Autodesk (Nasdaq: ADSK) looks too expensive to touch today? Think again.

The veteran maker of 3-D modeling and drafting software just reported a strong second quarter -- but was it strong enough to justify the stock price? The bottom line improved to $0.05 of earnings per diluted share, a huge leap from last quarter's $0.14 loss per share. The profit was a result of tight cost controls rather than organic growth, since revenue fell 3% quarter-over-quarter to $415 million.

Autodesk saw sequential improvement across many geographic and product-line business segments, so there are cautious signs of a rebound in parts of the business. Industry demand for Autodesk's AutoCAD and 3-D design and video software never completely dies. But it's also a darn expensive company, at least by some popular metrics: Autodesk's price-to-earnings ratio is in nosebleed territory.

Trading at over 100 times trailing earnings, Autodesk looks more expensive than usual high-growth suspects like Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), or Linux specialist Red Hat (NYSE: RHT). But if you dig a little deeper, Autodesk's results paint a different picture. Price to earnings ratios are so overrated.

With shares trading at 2.7 times sales, Autodesk actually looks very fairly valued when compared with its peers in the software industry. Adobe Systems (Nasdaq: ADBE), Apple, and Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL) all trade at more than 4 times trailing sales. Google and VMware (NYSE: VMW) both sit north of the six times sales mark -- and I believe both to be undervalued today.

At 27 times free cash flow, cash flow metrics may be another reason to scare investors away from Autodesk. Using a price-to-sales ratio against competitors doesn't mean much if the company is generating less profit on their sales, as has been the case with Autodesk. However, I believe we're looking at a temporary situation. Autodesk is generally a reliable cash machine, but this recession has hit the company hard. Only yesterday, the shares were worth a perfectly normal 15 times trailing free cash flows. Over $188 million of cash from the year-ago period just dropped off that trailing twelve-month range.

Autodesk will get back to its old cash-rich habits soon enough. Maintenance revenue held firm on a year-over-year basis, while revenue drop-off was primarily in due to anemic new licensing sales. Since Autodesk's products are so essential to many corporate customers, it should see robust growth once IT budgets come back to life and have budget to upgrade rather than skim by on aging software. And when they do, Autodesk will look cheap all around.

Would you buy Autodesk today? Share your thoughts in the comments box below.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Google and VMware are Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendations. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Autodesk. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Anders Bylund owns shares in Google but he holds no other position in any of the companies discussed here. You can check out Anders' holdings or a concise bio if you like, and The Motley Fool is investors writing for investors.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 14, 2009, at 4:37 PM, jamf92 wrote:

    Autodesk, too expensive? Only a fool would think so. Even in a VERY tough economy they are surviving pretty well. When the stimulus money really his the building industry and some more recovery occurs massive numbers of software users will need to upgrade and buy new versions of their software. Many have fallen off their annual subscription program due to financial issues but when stability returns they will want the latest, greatest and most efficient building software there is. Autodesk owns that world so a return to more healthy markets give this company a lot of room to go UP!

  • Report this Comment On August 14, 2009, at 10:15 PM, robertkall wrote:

    I think the key to the story is this "Autodesk will get back to its old cash-rich habits soon enough". It assumes that the old models of expensive software licensing and support plans will go on forever. That’s probably not the case. While Autodesk’s current packages are still the industry standard, new and different approaches to solve the same problems are likely to appear (e.g. as utility subscription services) that may threaten their dominance and earnings potential.

  • Report this Comment On August 15, 2009, at 12:30 PM, ZippyDDoodah wrote:

    First of all, little or no stimulus $$ is going to buildings. Infrastructure bridge work was supposed to be the beneficiary of such spending (most of the stimulus so far has been pork laden social spending and bailouts) and ADSK is not a player in the bridge market. As anyone in bridge design will tell you, Bentley dominates that market. ADSK, however, IS dominant in building/architectural design and engineeering, but that market is in horrible shape and getting worse.

    Collapsing new license sales are a more telling indicator than maintenance revenue, as companies are hanging on keeping software updated in the hopes things will soon getting better. I'm an engineer and I don't see it. Regarding the reliability of the maintenance revenue, users need to perceive that that they are getting value for their $$. If you peruse the engineering message boards at Autodesk's website or an outside site such as eng-tips.com, you'll see near universal disappointment with Autocad's latest release, which is their flagship product. This is consistent with what I'm hearing from my co-workers who are refusing to use the latest version.

    ADSK was able to save a huge pile of cash during boom times, but then they've been burning through it on misguided too-costly acquisitions (Moldflow, Revit, Algor, Robobat) which haven't paid for themselves rather than innovating in-house. Always a bad sign when a company consistently has to go outside to obtain "hot" products. Worse, these acquisitions do not fit with ADSK's core development expertise which are in drafting, design, and graphics, not engineering analysis. Does anyone honestly believe that ADSK has either expertise or experience to deal with products like Moldflow and Algor? Heck, their channel cannot even handle Revit. But I'm sure the acquisitions looked "genius" on the executive powerpoint.

    ADSK's core markets are building and architectural design, which is in horrific shape and getting worse, and in small-to-midsize manufacturing, which is also in bad, bad shape.

    Contrary to what another poster wrote, ADSK faces many different competitors, depending on the market. My guess is that poster who wrote that has a very narrow perspective that Autocad is their only product. In manufacturing, for example, Autodesk Inventor and Mech Desktop face fierce competition from Pro/E, SolidEdge and SolidWorks to name a few

    ADSK, imho has lost their mojo. Hence their over-reliance on acquisitions in the past several years with a decided lack on in-house innovation. My $0.02.

  • Report this Comment On August 17, 2009, at 11:49 AM, babybackribs wrote:

    I don't see this company doing well in the future. Especially sending all of their jobs to China. Best of luck to them.

  • Report this Comment On August 17, 2009, at 1:28 PM, greenwave3 wrote:

    ADSK is garbage at these levels. Cash flow stinks, P/E is outrageous, and growth is nil. Just because the other, better software developers are trading at premiums, doesn't mean that ADSK's inflated valuation is justified.

  • Report this Comment On August 18, 2009, at 12:06 PM, jamf92 wrote:

    Following is a link to a well done review on Autodesk at this juncture:

    http://seekingalpha.com/article/156492-autodesk-not-out-of-t...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 964536, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 4:17:43 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is Everybody Losing It in Finance's Nervous Breakdown?

Related Tickers

12/1/2009 3:42 PM
ORCL $22.41 Up +0.33 +1.49%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
RHT $27.43 Up +0.73 +2.73%
Red Hat, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
VMW $42.66 Up +0.68 +1.62%
VMware CAPS Rating: ****
ADSK $23.93 Up +0.48 +2.05%
Autodesk, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
ADBE $36.40 Up +1.32 +3.76%
Adobe Systems, Inc… CAPS Rating: *****
AAPL $196.97 Down -2.94 -1.47%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $589.87 Up +6.87 +1.18%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Texas ratio: The Texas ratio is a ratio used to determine the extent of a bank's credit trouble.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!