Recs

16

VMware's New Reality

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

I am going to come right out and say it: VMware (NYSE: VMW  ) is overvalued.  Its price premium may have made sense in a world where VMware faced little competition; it pretty much stood alone in the virtualization market since it was initially founded in 1998. However, software giants Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) and Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) have gained massive ground in the last two years. Microsoft has captured 25% of the virtualization market since it introduced Hyper-V in 2008 and with a recent update has added some missing must-have features. Oracle is also making a major play in virtualization with its recent release of Oracle VM Server for x86, and its all-in-one "cloud" appliance the Oracle Exalogic.

Small miss, big impact
A quick scan of VMware's financial data shows it trading at 104 times earnings at the time of this writing, which is more than double the computer software and services industry's already lofty average of 46. Stocks with such a high P/E ratio relative to their industry also tend to make massive corrections off relatively minor amounts of bad news. Just take a look at the most recent example of Equinix's (Nasdaq: EQIX  ) 33% drop on news of a 2.2% earnings miss. Even more alarming was VMware's 9% decline on the same news. VMware took another hit this week when it released earnings with weak operating cash flow figures. Even after a couple of rocky days, shares of VMware have still climbed 66% in the last year, and with the skittishness investors have shown lately, there's little margin for error in coming quarters.

Putting all their eggs in one basket
VMware derives 90% of its all-important licensing revenue from data center products like vSphere, its enterprise virtualization suite, which is being directly targeted by Microsoft, Oracle, and Citrix (Nasdaq: CTXS  ) . It seems to be missing a marketing opportunity by ignoring the consumer market. With Intel releasing six-core CPUs to the desktop today, and many more to come in the future, virtualization is a natural use of the available computing power.

VMware is not "The Cloud"
There is a lot of hype surrounding cloud computing. There are huge benefits such as cost savings, flexibility, and the ability to scale when your business grows. However VMware does not target this cloud demographic. Instead it is going after "private clouds" promising cost savings through better utilization and lower maintenance. There is a problem, however. As IT administrators move all of their hardware into virtualized clouds, they are simply replacing the cost of hardware with the cost of software. However, businesses still need to buy enough hardware to handle peak load. I just don't see them shutting down servers when they are not needed to save on power costs. This is where the public cloud comes into play. Public cloud providers can sell that extra processing power when it is not needed by a client, getting closer to full-utilization nirvana, and few of the major providers are using VMware products.

Wrapping it up
With its sky-high P/E ratio and vulnerable revenue stream, VMware is bound for a correction. As IT administrators start to scrutinize the real cost of VMware and compare it with lower cost and free offerings they may have to decrease their price. Lastly, the private cloud may not be all it's cracked up to be and VMware just is not a player in the public cloud. Put them all together, and you have a stock that is overvalued.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Mike Gurtzweiler own no shares of any company mentioned. Intel and Microsoft are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. VMware is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Motley Fool Options has recommended buying calls on Intel. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call position on Microsoft. The Fool owns shares of Intel, Microsoft, and Oracle. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 21, 2010, at 3:46 PM, yanxandnix wrote:

    You obviously do not work in the IT field. If you did, you would know that Microsoft never gets anything right the first time around. Virtualization, whether on-premise or in the cloud, is here now. Microsoft is several years late to the party. As you even stated, Microsoft just recently added some "missing must-have" features. These are features that VMWare has had for several years. Corporations will go with the trusted name and leader in virtualization, VMWare. There is also so much growth in virtualization that these companies can easily coexist, the same way hardware vendors exist today (HP, Dell, IBM, etc.) As far as Oracle goes, they should have purchased VMWare instead of Virtual Iron. This is another product that has missed the boat.

  • Report this Comment On October 21, 2010, at 11:33 PM, yyzfan wrote:

    Perfect timing for your article, the blogs are abuzz with information about VMware and competition....

    http://blogs.gartner.com/thomas_bittman/2010/10/18/virtualiz...

    http://searchservervirtualization.techtarget.com/generic/0,2...

    http://virtualizationreview.com/Blogs/The-Hoard-Facts/2010/1...

    Everyone understands all the "big boys" are getting into this space, what people fail to realize is how big VMware has become in people's minds and datacenter. (don't forget developers... Spring Source is loved by Java developers as much as ESX is by data center managers). Balmer hasn't missed this point.

    You mention Oracle and CTXS, but fail to mention that their chosen architecture is ...to paraphrase Pulp Fiction "Zen's dead, baby. Zen's dead." Linux is moving to KVM, Citrix and Oracle chose wrong, plain and simple.

    Two Take a ways...

    The hypervisor is fundamentally counter to Microsoft's umbrella strategy. It degrades and devalues their precious OS on the server and desktop side, no matter what hypervisor it is...

    MS has 100x more competition with Google and Apple.

    The fight with VMware can wait, Apple and Google are immediate threats to desktop, office and server cash cows. VMware is just flanking them while Apple and Google deploy the heavy artillery..

    Look at the plug in your walls, that's what IT will be like in 15 years...

  • Report this Comment On October 22, 2010, at 2:04 AM, cyborg4 wrote:

    VMware is very much in the public cloud arena.

    Verizon, Terremark, Salesforce.com and others use its software as the basis for their cloud offerings.

    VMware has no interest to cannibalize its customers and partners by offering its own public service.

  • Report this Comment On October 22, 2010, at 3:36 AM, akbarcaskey678 wrote:

    Of course vmw is overvalued; look at it fundementals, but it is already down $14 from its 52 week high and sure it could drop even further. That much is obvious.

    However, from listening to the conference call this past week, vmw posted another record profit and is seeing a strong demand from corporations and the federal government, not to mention Russia, thus the competition from microsoft and oracle is minimual as of right now which is why vmw price to sales ratio hs been steadly declining over the past couple years.

    Besides microsoft is destroying its company by

    putting out junk like windows vista and windows mobile. They will not be the same company in 5 to 10 years.

    Furthermore, cloud computing is ground breaking

    technology that could transform technology like netscape and windows 95 did in the 1990s. It is more cost efficient, convienent and effective in storing and sending data because it eliminates the hardware. Sure you need servers to handle peak load, but no where near as many as you do now and that saves mucho dinero.

    Finally, cloud computing is basically running programs and storing data over the internet which is so cost saving because the internet is cheap, fast, and everything would be in one place. I agree vmw is overvalued now, but I'm loading the boat if it drops down to 65 and below.

  • Report this Comment On October 22, 2010, at 7:54 AM, EquityBull wrote:

    I'll give you a real world example. We have 12 servers at Rackspace. It would cost us MORE to cut them to just two or three with vmware then it does for us to just keep the 12. Management would be easier in some ways but we would pay a lot more for that privilege.

    VMware is great but they need to cut their pricing by 80% to be cost effective

    So much for cost savings.....

  • Report this Comment On October 23, 2010, at 1:03 AM, adrianshaw1 wrote:

    I'm going to come right out and say it .... Mike Gurtzweile is overvalued

    Incomplete analysis, conjecture, misinterpretation of data. This is a plain awful, rotten article. The consumer market!! ..... OMG!

    The shame of it is that VMW does look really expensive and we need a thorough review on whether its a hype-comet or the next Google or Apple.

  • Report this Comment On October 29, 2010, at 4:07 AM, BigBadViper wrote:

    I hear so many people in the field that just don't understand VMware. They complain about how expensive VMware is and that you can get a free hypervisor like Hyper-V and some of the others.

    Speaking on the condition of having worked in this space for a LONG time and being a microsoft Certified professional in Virtualization and a Vmware certified Professional. I can tell you hands down Vmware wins.

    Someone complained that Vmware was too expensive for their 12 servers in Rackspace. Use ESXi, it is free. It only costs money when it is managed by vCenter. You don't need vCenter for 12 servers. I currently have 150 VMware hosts running 1000s of VMs and MS can't compete with that.

    I also see the things that VMware is doing as a company that are very progressive. I look at companies like Novell that had a good product but never improved it or marketed it correctly. VMware is not that company and they are making those mistakes.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1340387, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 7:37:57 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
ORCL $26.14 Up +0.02 +0.08%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
VMW $94.02 Down -1.41 -1.48%
VMware CAPS Rating: ***
MSFT $29.06 Down -0.01 -0.03%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ****
CTXS $75.43 Down -0.26 -0.34%
Citrix Systems, In… CAPS Rating: **
EQIX $157.92 Down -0.05 -0.03%
Equinix, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement